经尿道前列腺切除术中两种直接口服抗凝剂围手术期出血风险的比较

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Lu Yu Kuo, Jenny Kuo, Joshua Silverman, Jason Jae Yeun Kim, Caitlin Letch, Scott McClintock
{"title":"经尿道前列腺切除术中两种直接口服抗凝剂围手术期出血风险的比较","authors":"Lu Yu Kuo, Jenny Kuo, Joshua Silverman, Jason Jae Yeun Kim, Caitlin Letch, Scott McClintock","doi":"10.1111/bju.16478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).Patients and MethodsThis was a single‐centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent TURP for benign prostate hyperplasia from April 2019 to December 2023. The primary objective was to evaluate the perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between anticoagulated (AC) vs no‐AC patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between different formulations of DOACs. Patient demographics, prior treatment, prostate size, baseline bleeding risk, and operative details were collected. Bleeding and thromboembolic‐related morbidity were captured within a 3‐month postoperative period. Perioperative management of AC therapy was recorded, and all patients had their AC therapy withheld. Cohort characteristic between the AC vs no‐AC, and DOAC groups were analysed with two‐sided <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>‐test, and chi‐square test. Further logistic regression analyses were carried out to identified significant variables between the groups. These significant variables were used for adjustment in inverse probability‐weighted treatment effect analysis to evaluate bleeding risk.ResultsThere were 629 patients in the cohort, and 113 (18%) patients were receiving AC therapy. The AC patients were at 1.6 times statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding, and 11 times increased risk of prolonged haematuria for &gt;14 days. When compared to apixaban, patients on rivaroxaban conferred a statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding by 2.21 times. Patients receiving AC therapy had a statistically significant increased risk of stroke in the perioperative setting (no‐AC vs AC: 0.4% vs 2.7%, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.01).ConclusionThis is the first study to evaluate risk of bleeding for TURP patients receiving DOACs. The AC patients are more likely to experience haematuria and stroke in the perioperative period despite withholding therapy. Apixaban appears to cause less bleeding‐related complications than rivaroxaban.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of perioperative bleeding risk between direct oral anticoagulants in transurethral resection of prostate\",\"authors\":\"Lu Yu Kuo, Jenny Kuo, Joshua Silverman, Jason Jae Yeun Kim, Caitlin Letch, Scott McClintock\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bju.16478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesTo evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).Patients and MethodsThis was a single‐centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent TURP for benign prostate hyperplasia from April 2019 to December 2023. The primary objective was to evaluate the perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between anticoagulated (AC) vs no‐AC patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between different formulations of DOACs. Patient demographics, prior treatment, prostate size, baseline bleeding risk, and operative details were collected. Bleeding and thromboembolic‐related morbidity were captured within a 3‐month postoperative period. Perioperative management of AC therapy was recorded, and all patients had their AC therapy withheld. Cohort characteristic between the AC vs no‐AC, and DOAC groups were analysed with two‐sided <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>‐test, and chi‐square test. Further logistic regression analyses were carried out to identified significant variables between the groups. These significant variables were used for adjustment in inverse probability‐weighted treatment effect analysis to evaluate bleeding risk.ResultsThere were 629 patients in the cohort, and 113 (18%) patients were receiving AC therapy. The AC patients were at 1.6 times statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding, and 11 times increased risk of prolonged haematuria for &gt;14 days. When compared to apixaban, patients on rivaroxaban conferred a statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding by 2.21 times. Patients receiving AC therapy had a statistically significant increased risk of stroke in the perioperative setting (no‐AC vs AC: 0.4% vs 2.7%, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.01).ConclusionThis is the first study to evaluate risk of bleeding for TURP patients receiving DOACs. The AC patients are more likely to experience haematuria and stroke in the perioperative period despite withholding therapy. Apixaban appears to cause less bleeding‐related complications than rivaroxaban.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJU International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJU International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16478\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16478","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估接受经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)的患者使用直接口服抗凝药(DOAC)和华法林的围术期发病率和死亡率。患者和方法这是一项单中心回顾性队列分析,分析对象是2019年4月至2023年12月期间因良性前列腺增生接受TURP手术的患者。主要目的是评估抗凝(AC)与无抗凝患者的围手术期出血和血栓栓塞风险。次要目标是评估不同配方 DOACs 的围手术期出血和血栓栓塞风险。研究人员收集了患者的人口统计学资料、既往治疗情况、前列腺大小、基线出血风险和手术细节。采集了术后 3 个月内出血和血栓栓塞相关的发病率。记录了AC治疗的围手术期管理情况,所有患者都暂停了AC治疗。使用双侧 t 检验和卡方检验分析了 AC 组与无 AC 组和 DOAC 组之间的队列特征。还进行了进一步的逻辑回归分析,以确定组间的重要变量。结果队列中有 629 名患者,其中 113 名(18%)患者接受了 AC 治疗。据统计,接受阿昔单抗治疗的患者发生急性出血的风险增加了1.6倍,血尿时间延长14天的风险增加了11倍。与阿哌沙班相比,接受利伐沙班治疗的患者急性出血的风险在统计学上显著增加了2.21倍。接受 AC 治疗的患者在围手术期发生中风的风险有统计学意义的显著增加(无 AC vs AC:0.4% vs 2.7%,P = 0.01)。尽管暂停了治疗,但接受 AC 治疗的患者在围手术期更有可能出现血尿和中风。阿哌沙班引起的出血相关并发症似乎少于利伐沙班。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of perioperative bleeding risk between direct oral anticoagulants in transurethral resection of prostate
ObjectivesTo evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).Patients and MethodsThis was a single‐centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent TURP for benign prostate hyperplasia from April 2019 to December 2023. The primary objective was to evaluate the perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between anticoagulated (AC) vs no‐AC patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between different formulations of DOACs. Patient demographics, prior treatment, prostate size, baseline bleeding risk, and operative details were collected. Bleeding and thromboembolic‐related morbidity were captured within a 3‐month postoperative period. Perioperative management of AC therapy was recorded, and all patients had their AC therapy withheld. Cohort characteristic between the AC vs no‐AC, and DOAC groups were analysed with two‐sided t‐test, and chi‐square test. Further logistic regression analyses were carried out to identified significant variables between the groups. These significant variables were used for adjustment in inverse probability‐weighted treatment effect analysis to evaluate bleeding risk.ResultsThere were 629 patients in the cohort, and 113 (18%) patients were receiving AC therapy. The AC patients were at 1.6 times statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding, and 11 times increased risk of prolonged haematuria for >14 days. When compared to apixaban, patients on rivaroxaban conferred a statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding by 2.21 times. Patients receiving AC therapy had a statistically significant increased risk of stroke in the perioperative setting (no‐AC vs AC: 0.4% vs 2.7%, P = 0.01).ConclusionThis is the first study to evaluate risk of bleeding for TURP patients receiving DOACs. The AC patients are more likely to experience haematuria and stroke in the perioperative period despite withholding therapy. Apixaban appears to cause less bleeding‐related complications than rivaroxaban.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信