肾上腺静脉取样与超低剂量促肾上腺皮质激素输注在原发性醛固酮增多症诊断评估中的作用

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Christopher A. Preston, Eric X. Z. Yong, Benjamin Marginson, Stephen G. Farrell, Matthew P. Sawyer, Hikaru Hashimura, Maresa M. Derbyshire, Richard J. MacIsaac, Nirupa Sachithanandan
{"title":"肾上腺静脉取样与超低剂量促肾上腺皮质激素输注在原发性醛固酮增多症诊断评估中的作用","authors":"Christopher A. Preston,&nbsp;Eric X. Z. Yong,&nbsp;Benjamin Marginson,&nbsp;Stephen G. Farrell,&nbsp;Matthew P. Sawyer,&nbsp;Hikaru Hashimura,&nbsp;Maresa M. Derbyshire,&nbsp;Richard J. MacIsaac,&nbsp;Nirupa Sachithanandan","doi":"10.1002/edm2.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Adrenal vein sampling (AVS), integral to identifying surgically remediable unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA), is technically challenging and subject to fluctuations in cortisol and aldosterone secretion. Intra-procedural adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), conventionally administered as a 250-μg bolus and/or 50 μg per hour infusion, increases cortisol and aldosterone secretion and can improve AVS success, but may cause discordant lateralisation compared to unstimulated AVS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To assess if AVS performed with ultra-low dose ACTH infusion causes discordant lateralisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Here, we describe our preliminary experience using an ultra-low dose ACTH infusion AVS protocol. We retrospectively reviewed the results of consecutive AVS procedures (<i>n</i> = 37) performed with and without ultra-low dose ACTH (1-μg bolus followed by 1.25 μg per hour infusion).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Bilateral AV cannulation was successful in 70% of procedures pre-ACTH and 89% post-ACTH (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Sixty-nine percent of studies lateralised pre-ACTH and 55% post-ACTH, improving to 79% when both groups were combined. Lateralisation was discordant in 11 cases, including eight in which lateralisation was present only on basal sampling, and three in which lateralisation occurred only with ACTH stimulation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, the decrease in lateralisation rates with ACTH was higher than previously reported for some protocols utilising conventional doses of ACTH. Our results suggest that AVS performed with ultra-low dose ACTH can cause discordant lateralisation similar to AVS performed with conventional doses of ACTH.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective studies directly comparing low and conventional dose ACTH AVS protocols and long-term patient outcomes are needed to help define the optimal ACTH dose for accurate PA subtyping.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Adrenal Vein Sampling With and Without Ultra-Low Dose ACTH Infusion in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Primary Aldosteronism\",\"authors\":\"Christopher A. Preston,&nbsp;Eric X. Z. Yong,&nbsp;Benjamin Marginson,&nbsp;Stephen G. Farrell,&nbsp;Matthew P. Sawyer,&nbsp;Hikaru Hashimura,&nbsp;Maresa M. Derbyshire,&nbsp;Richard J. MacIsaac,&nbsp;Nirupa Sachithanandan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edm2.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adrenal vein sampling (AVS), integral to identifying surgically remediable unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA), is technically challenging and subject to fluctuations in cortisol and aldosterone secretion. Intra-procedural adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), conventionally administered as a 250-μg bolus and/or 50 μg per hour infusion, increases cortisol and aldosterone secretion and can improve AVS success, but may cause discordant lateralisation compared to unstimulated AVS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess if AVS performed with ultra-low dose ACTH infusion causes discordant lateralisation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Here, we describe our preliminary experience using an ultra-low dose ACTH infusion AVS protocol. We retrospectively reviewed the results of consecutive AVS procedures (<i>n</i> = 37) performed with and without ultra-low dose ACTH (1-μg bolus followed by 1.25 μg per hour infusion).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Bilateral AV cannulation was successful in 70% of procedures pre-ACTH and 89% post-ACTH (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Sixty-nine percent of studies lateralised pre-ACTH and 55% post-ACTH, improving to 79% when both groups were combined. Lateralisation was discordant in 11 cases, including eight in which lateralisation was present only on basal sampling, and three in which lateralisation occurred only with ACTH stimulation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, the decrease in lateralisation rates with ACTH was higher than previously reported for some protocols utilising conventional doses of ACTH. Our results suggest that AVS performed with ultra-low dose ACTH can cause discordant lateralisation similar to AVS performed with conventional doses of ACTH.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prospective studies directly comparing low and conventional dose ACTH AVS protocols and long-term patient outcomes are needed to help define the optimal ACTH dose for accurate PA subtyping.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.70001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.70001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.70001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景肾上腺静脉取样(AVS)是确定可通过手术补救的单侧原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)不可或缺的方法,在技术上具有挑战性,而且皮质醇和醛固酮的分泌会发生波动。传统的术中促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)给药方式为 250 μg 栓注和/或每小时 50 μg 输注,可增加皮质醇和醛固酮的分泌,提高 AVS 的成功率,但与未受刺激的 AVS 相比,可能会导致不协调的侧位。 目的 评估超低剂量促肾上腺皮质激素输注进行的 AVS 是否会导致不一致的侧位。 方法 在此,我们介绍了使用超低剂量促肾上腺皮质激素输注 AVS 方案的初步经验。我们回顾性分析了使用和不使用超低剂量促肾上腺皮质激素(1-μg 栓注,然后每小时输注 1.25 μg)进行的连续房室插管手术(37 例)的结果。 结果 70% 的双侧房室插管手术在 ACTH 前成功,89% 在 ACTH 后成功(p < 0.01)。69%的研究在 ACTH 前侧卧位,55%在 ACTH 后侧卧位,两组合并后侧卧位率提高到 79%。11个病例的侧位不一致,其中8个病例仅在基础采样时出现侧位,3个病例仅在ACTH刺激时出现侧位。 讨论 总体而言,在使用常规剂量的促肾上腺皮质激素的某些方案中,促肾上腺皮质激素的侧化率下降幅度高于之前的报道。我们的结果表明,使用超低剂量促肾上腺皮质激素进行的 AVS 与使用常规剂量促肾上腺皮质激素进行的 AVS 相似,都会导致不和谐的侧化。 结论 需要进行前瞻性研究,直接比较低剂量和常规剂量的促肾上腺皮质激素 AVS 方案以及患者的长期预后,以帮助确定最佳促肾上腺皮质激素剂量,准确进行 PA 亚型鉴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Utility of Adrenal Vein Sampling With and Without Ultra-Low Dose ACTH Infusion in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Primary Aldosteronism

Utility of Adrenal Vein Sampling With and Without Ultra-Low Dose ACTH Infusion in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Primary Aldosteronism

Background

Adrenal vein sampling (AVS), integral to identifying surgically remediable unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA), is technically challenging and subject to fluctuations in cortisol and aldosterone secretion. Intra-procedural adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), conventionally administered as a 250-μg bolus and/or 50 μg per hour infusion, increases cortisol and aldosterone secretion and can improve AVS success, but may cause discordant lateralisation compared to unstimulated AVS.

Aims

To assess if AVS performed with ultra-low dose ACTH infusion causes discordant lateralisation.

Methods

Here, we describe our preliminary experience using an ultra-low dose ACTH infusion AVS protocol. We retrospectively reviewed the results of consecutive AVS procedures (n = 37) performed with and without ultra-low dose ACTH (1-μg bolus followed by 1.25 μg per hour infusion).

Results

Bilateral AV cannulation was successful in 70% of procedures pre-ACTH and 89% post-ACTH (p < 0.01). Sixty-nine percent of studies lateralised pre-ACTH and 55% post-ACTH, improving to 79% when both groups were combined. Lateralisation was discordant in 11 cases, including eight in which lateralisation was present only on basal sampling, and three in which lateralisation occurred only with ACTH stimulation.

Discussion

Overall, the decrease in lateralisation rates with ACTH was higher than previously reported for some protocols utilising conventional doses of ACTH. Our results suggest that AVS performed with ultra-low dose ACTH can cause discordant lateralisation similar to AVS performed with conventional doses of ACTH.

Conclusion

Prospective studies directly comparing low and conventional dose ACTH AVS protocols and long-term patient outcomes are needed to help define the optimal ACTH dose for accurate PA subtyping.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信