高固体消化 - 完全搅拌式和塞流式反应器系统的比较

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ebba Perman , Anna Karlsson , Maria Westerholm , Simon Isaksson , Anna Schnürer
{"title":"高固体消化 - 完全搅拌式和塞流式反应器系统的比较","authors":"Ebba Perman ,&nbsp;Anna Karlsson ,&nbsp;Maria Westerholm ,&nbsp;Simon Isaksson ,&nbsp;Anna Schnürer","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2024.08.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-solid digestion (HSD) for biogas production is a resource-efficient and sustainable method to treat organic wastes with high total solids content and obtain renewable energy and an organic fertiliser, using a lower dilution rate than in the more common wet digestion process. This study examined the effect of reactor type on the performance of an HSD process, comparing plug-flow (PFR) type reactors developed for continuous HSD processes, and completely stirred-tank reactors (CSTRs) commonly used for wet digestion. The HSD process was operated in thermophilic conditions (52 °C), with a mixture of household waste, garden waste and agricultural residues (total solids content 27–28 %). The PFRs showed slightly better performance, with higher specific methane production and nitrogen mineralisation than the CSTRs, while the reduction of volatile solids was the same in both reactor types. Results from 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed a significant difference in the microbial population, potentially related to large differences in stirring speed between the reactor types (1 rpm in PFRs and 70–150 rpm in CSTRs, respectively). The bacterial community was dominated by the genus <em>Defluviitoga</em> in the PFRs and order MBA03 in the CSTRs. For the archaeal community, there was a predominance of the genus <em>Methanoculleus</em> in the PFRs, and of the genera <em>Methanosarcina</em> and <em>Methanothermobacter</em> in the CSTRs. Despite these shifts in microbiology, the results showed that stable digestion of substrates with high total solids content can be achieved in both reactor types, indicating flexibility in the choice of technique for HSD processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"189 ","pages":"Pages 265-275"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X24004574/pdfft?md5=20130ddfcfd1bc5c2f4936ab6a59420b&pid=1-s2.0-S0956053X24004574-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-solid digestion – A comparison of completely stirred and plug-flow reactor systems\",\"authors\":\"Ebba Perman ,&nbsp;Anna Karlsson ,&nbsp;Maria Westerholm ,&nbsp;Simon Isaksson ,&nbsp;Anna Schnürer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wasman.2024.08.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>High-solid digestion (HSD) for biogas production is a resource-efficient and sustainable method to treat organic wastes with high total solids content and obtain renewable energy and an organic fertiliser, using a lower dilution rate than in the more common wet digestion process. This study examined the effect of reactor type on the performance of an HSD process, comparing plug-flow (PFR) type reactors developed for continuous HSD processes, and completely stirred-tank reactors (CSTRs) commonly used for wet digestion. The HSD process was operated in thermophilic conditions (52 °C), with a mixture of household waste, garden waste and agricultural residues (total solids content 27–28 %). The PFRs showed slightly better performance, with higher specific methane production and nitrogen mineralisation than the CSTRs, while the reduction of volatile solids was the same in both reactor types. Results from 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed a significant difference in the microbial population, potentially related to large differences in stirring speed between the reactor types (1 rpm in PFRs and 70–150 rpm in CSTRs, respectively). The bacterial community was dominated by the genus <em>Defluviitoga</em> in the PFRs and order MBA03 in the CSTRs. For the archaeal community, there was a predominance of the genus <em>Methanoculleus</em> in the PFRs, and of the genera <em>Methanosarcina</em> and <em>Methanothermobacter</em> in the CSTRs. Despite these shifts in microbiology, the results showed that stable digestion of substrates with high total solids content can be achieved in both reactor types, indicating flexibility in the choice of technique for HSD processes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Waste management\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 265-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X24004574/pdfft?md5=20130ddfcfd1bc5c2f4936ab6a59420b&pid=1-s2.0-S0956053X24004574-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Waste management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X24004574\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X24004574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于生产沼气的高固体消化(HSD)是一种资源节约型和可持续发展的方法,可用于处理总固体含量较高的有机废物,并获得可再生能源和有机肥料,其稀释率低于更常见的湿法消化工艺。本研究比较了为连续 HSD 工艺开发的塞流式(PFR)反应器和常用于湿法消化的完全搅拌罐反应器(CSTR),考察了反应器类型对 HSD 工艺性能的影响。HSD 工艺在嗜热条件(52 °C)下运行,混合了生活垃圾、花园垃圾和农业残留物(总固体含量为 27-28%)。PFR 的性能略好于 CSTR,甲烷产量和氮矿化度均高于 CSTR,而两种反应器的挥发性固体减少量相同。16S rRNA 基因测序结果显示,微生物群落存在显著差异,这可能与反应器类型之间搅拌速度的巨大差异有关(PFR 和 CSTR 的搅拌速度分别为 1 rpm 和 70-150 rpm)。在 PFR 中,细菌群落以 Defluviitoga 属为主,而在 CSTR 中则以 MBA03 目为主。在古细菌群落中,PFRs 中主要是 Methanoculleus 属,CSTRs 中主要是 Methanosarcina 属和 Methanothermobacter 属。尽管微生物发生了这些变化,但结果表明,两种类型的反应器都能对总固体含量较高的底物进行稳定消化,这表明在选择 HSD 工艺技术时具有灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

High-solid digestion – A comparison of completely stirred and plug-flow reactor systems

High-solid digestion – A comparison of completely stirred and plug-flow reactor systems

High-solid digestion (HSD) for biogas production is a resource-efficient and sustainable method to treat organic wastes with high total solids content and obtain renewable energy and an organic fertiliser, using a lower dilution rate than in the more common wet digestion process. This study examined the effect of reactor type on the performance of an HSD process, comparing plug-flow (PFR) type reactors developed for continuous HSD processes, and completely stirred-tank reactors (CSTRs) commonly used for wet digestion. The HSD process was operated in thermophilic conditions (52 °C), with a mixture of household waste, garden waste and agricultural residues (total solids content 27–28 %). The PFRs showed slightly better performance, with higher specific methane production and nitrogen mineralisation than the CSTRs, while the reduction of volatile solids was the same in both reactor types. Results from 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed a significant difference in the microbial population, potentially related to large differences in stirring speed between the reactor types (1 rpm in PFRs and 70–150 rpm in CSTRs, respectively). The bacterial community was dominated by the genus Defluviitoga in the PFRs and order MBA03 in the CSTRs. For the archaeal community, there was a predominance of the genus Methanoculleus in the PFRs, and of the genera Methanosarcina and Methanothermobacter in the CSTRs. Despite these shifts in microbiology, the results showed that stable digestion of substrates with high total solids content can be achieved in both reactor types, indicating flexibility in the choice of technique for HSD processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信