基于乘法分解的有限应变粘弹性模型比较

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
F. Gouhier, J. Diani
{"title":"基于乘法分解的有限应变粘弹性模型比较","authors":"F. Gouhier,&nbsp;J. Diani","doi":"10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The constitutive equations of several finite strain viscoelastic models, based on the multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient tensor and formulated in a thermodynamically consistent framework, are reviewed to demonstrate their similarities and differences. The proposed analysis shows that dissipation formulations, which may appear different, are similar when expressed in the same configuration, enabling the definition of a unified <em>general model</em>. The ability of this <em>general model</em> to reproduce the main features of the behavior of rubbers is then explored. First, its responses are compared to those of finite linear viscoelastic models commonly implemented in commercial finite element codes. Cases of monotonic uniaxial tension and simple shear, relaxation, and sinusoidal simple shear are considered. Second, a comparison is made between a classic generalized Maxwell rheological scheme and a Zener one with a non-constant viscosity, exploring the relevance of both options within the <em>general model</em>’s constitutive equations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50483,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 105424"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of finite strain viscoelastic models based on the multiplicative decomposition\",\"authors\":\"F. Gouhier,&nbsp;J. Diani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The constitutive equations of several finite strain viscoelastic models, based on the multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient tensor and formulated in a thermodynamically consistent framework, are reviewed to demonstrate their similarities and differences. The proposed analysis shows that dissipation formulations, which may appear different, are similar when expressed in the same configuration, enabling the definition of a unified <em>general model</em>. The ability of this <em>general model</em> to reproduce the main features of the behavior of rubbers is then explored. First, its responses are compared to those of finite linear viscoelastic models commonly implemented in commercial finite element codes. Cases of monotonic uniaxial tension and simple shear, relaxation, and sinusoidal simple shear are considered. Second, a comparison is made between a classic generalized Maxwell rheological scheme and a Zener one with a non-constant viscosity, exploring the relevance of both options within the <em>general model</em>’s constitutive equations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997753824002043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997753824002043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文回顾了几种有限应变粘弹性模型的构成方程,这些方程基于变形梯度张量的乘法分解,并在热力学一致的框架内进行表述,以展示它们的异同。所提出的分析表明,耗散公式看似不同,但在相同配置中表达时却很相似,因此可以定义一个统一的通用模型。然后,探讨了这一通用模型再现橡胶行为主要特征的能力。首先,将其响应与商业有限元代码中常用的有限线性粘弹性模型的响应进行比较。考虑了单调单轴拉伸和简单剪切、松弛和正弦简单剪切的情况。其次,比较了经典的广义麦克斯韦流变学方案和具有非恒定粘度的齐纳流变学方案,探讨了这两种方案在一般模型构成方程中的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of finite strain viscoelastic models based on the multiplicative decomposition

The constitutive equations of several finite strain viscoelastic models, based on the multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient tensor and formulated in a thermodynamically consistent framework, are reviewed to demonstrate their similarities and differences. The proposed analysis shows that dissipation formulations, which may appear different, are similar when expressed in the same configuration, enabling the definition of a unified general model. The ability of this general model to reproduce the main features of the behavior of rubbers is then explored. First, its responses are compared to those of finite linear viscoelastic models commonly implemented in commercial finite element codes. Cases of monotonic uniaxial tension and simple shear, relaxation, and sinusoidal simple shear are considered. Second, a comparison is made between a classic generalized Maxwell rheological scheme and a Zener one with a non-constant viscosity, exploring the relevance of both options within the general model’s constitutive equations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
275
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Mechanics endash; A/Solids continues to publish articles in English in all areas of Solid Mechanics from the physical and mathematical basis to materials engineering, technological applications and methods of modern computational mechanics, both pure and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信