用于农村电气化的四种混合可再生能源模式的技术、经济和环境评估与优化

Kelvin Nkalo Ukoima , Okoro Ogbonnaya Inya , Akuru Udochukwu Bola , Davidson Innocent Ewean
{"title":"用于农村电气化的四种混合可再生能源模式的技术、经济和环境评估与优化","authors":"Kelvin Nkalo Ukoima ,&nbsp;Okoro Ogbonnaya Inya ,&nbsp;Akuru Udochukwu Bola ,&nbsp;Davidson Innocent Ewean","doi":"10.1016/j.solcom.2024.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This work investigates the technical, economic and environmental feasibility of four solar – wind off grid hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) models to provide electrification for Okorobo-Ile town in Andoni Local Government Area of River State, Nigeria using the Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Electric Renewables (HOMER) software. In particular, investigation of the possible inclusion of a fuel cell (FC) system is performed. The four considered models are: pv/wind/battery (PWB); pv/wind/battery/gen-set (PWBG), pv/wind/fuel-cell (PWF) and pv/wind/battery/fuel-cell (PWBF). The best cost-effective configuration among the set of systems were examined for the electricity requirement of 677.75 kWh/day primary load with 99.1 kW peak load. Results obtained showed that the net present cost (NPC) are $615,664.95, $679,348.17, $778,834.22 and $3,534,850.54 respectively for the PWB, PWBG, PWBF and PWF. The cost of energy (COE) was lowest for the PWB with a value of $$0.158 and highest for the PWF with a value of $0.964. The renewable options—PWBF and PWF have higher long-term costs but offer cleaner emissions. In contrast, options with the Diesel-Powered Generator is cost-effective but has a high environmental impact in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and noise pollution. These emissions include 3,758 kg/yr CO<sub>2</sub>, 23.7 kg/yr CO and a total of 32.67 kg/yr of unburned hydrocarbons, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter and nitrogen oxides. Based on the results, a stand - alone HRES that consist of 166 kW PV panels, 3 wind turbines 29 batteries and 123 kW converter is found to be the best configuration for the village, as it leads to minimum net present cost (NPC) and COE. The PWB system offers the best choice for the community by balancing financial considerations with sustainability which is crucial when making energy system choices. Results also show that while hydrogen, FC system and the electrolyzer can be used together with or without batteries, inclusion of the FC system resulted in the high NPC due to their high cost of investment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101173,"journal":{"name":"Solar Compass","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772940024000213/pdfft?md5=c0f26d79aa639cbe5300db871badcdaf&pid=1-s2.0-S2772940024000213-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical, economic and environmental assessment and optimization of four hybrid renewable energy models for rural electrification\",\"authors\":\"Kelvin Nkalo Ukoima ,&nbsp;Okoro Ogbonnaya Inya ,&nbsp;Akuru Udochukwu Bola ,&nbsp;Davidson Innocent Ewean\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.solcom.2024.100087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This work investigates the technical, economic and environmental feasibility of four solar – wind off grid hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) models to provide electrification for Okorobo-Ile town in Andoni Local Government Area of River State, Nigeria using the Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Electric Renewables (HOMER) software. In particular, investigation of the possible inclusion of a fuel cell (FC) system is performed. The four considered models are: pv/wind/battery (PWB); pv/wind/battery/gen-set (PWBG), pv/wind/fuel-cell (PWF) and pv/wind/battery/fuel-cell (PWBF). The best cost-effective configuration among the set of systems were examined for the electricity requirement of 677.75 kWh/day primary load with 99.1 kW peak load. Results obtained showed that the net present cost (NPC) are $615,664.95, $679,348.17, $778,834.22 and $3,534,850.54 respectively for the PWB, PWBG, PWBF and PWF. The cost of energy (COE) was lowest for the PWB with a value of $$0.158 and highest for the PWF with a value of $0.964. The renewable options—PWBF and PWF have higher long-term costs but offer cleaner emissions. In contrast, options with the Diesel-Powered Generator is cost-effective but has a high environmental impact in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and noise pollution. These emissions include 3,758 kg/yr CO<sub>2</sub>, 23.7 kg/yr CO and a total of 32.67 kg/yr of unburned hydrocarbons, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter and nitrogen oxides. Based on the results, a stand - alone HRES that consist of 166 kW PV panels, 3 wind turbines 29 batteries and 123 kW converter is found to be the best configuration for the village, as it leads to minimum net present cost (NPC) and COE. The PWB system offers the best choice for the community by balancing financial considerations with sustainability which is crucial when making energy system choices. Results also show that while hydrogen, FC system and the electrolyzer can be used together with or without batteries, inclusion of the FC system resulted in the high NPC due to their high cost of investment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solar Compass\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772940024000213/pdfft?md5=c0f26d79aa639cbe5300db871badcdaf&pid=1-s2.0-S2772940024000213-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solar Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772940024000213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772940024000213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究利用多种可再生能源混合优化(HOMER)软件,对四种太阳能-风能离网混合可再生能源系统(HRES)模型的技术、经济和环境可行性进行了调查,以便为尼日利亚里弗州安多尼地方政府辖区的 Okorobo-Ile 镇提供电气化服务。特别是,对燃料电池(FC)系统的可能加入进行了调查。考虑的四种模式分别是:光伏/风能/电池(PWB)、光伏/风能/电池/发电机组(PWBG)、光伏/风能/燃料电池(PWF)和光伏/风能/电池/燃料电池(PWBF)。针对初级负荷为 677.75 千瓦时/天、峰值负荷为 99.1 千瓦的用电需求,对这套系统中最具成本效益的配置进行了研究。结果显示,PWB、PWBG、PWBF 和 PWF 的净现值成本(NPC)分别为 615,664.95 美元、679,348.17 美元、778,834.22 美元和 3,534,850.54 美元。工务工程建筑的能源成本(COE)最低,为 0.158 美元,而工务工程设施的能源成本(COE)最高,为 0.964 美元。可再生方案 - PWBF 和 PWF 的长期成本较高,但排放更清洁。相比之下,柴油发电机的成本效益较高,但在温室气体排放和噪音污染方面对环境影响较大。这些排放物包括每年 3 758 千克二氧化碳、每年 23.7 千克一氧化碳以及每年 32.67 千克未燃烧碳氢化合物、二氧化硫、微粒物质和氮氧化物。研究结果表明,由 166 千瓦光伏电池板、3 台风力涡轮机、29 个电池组和 123 千瓦变流器组成的独立 HRES 是该村的最佳配置,因为它能使净现值成本(NPC)和二氧化碳排放量(COE)降到最低。PWB 系统为该社区提供了最佳选择,它兼顾了财务因素和可持续性,这在选择能源系统时至关重要。结果还显示,虽然氢气、燃料电池系统和电解槽可与电池或不与电池一起使用,但由于燃料电池系统的投资成本较高,加入燃料电池系统会导致净现值成本较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technical, economic and environmental assessment and optimization of four hybrid renewable energy models for rural electrification

This work investigates the technical, economic and environmental feasibility of four solar – wind off grid hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) models to provide electrification for Okorobo-Ile town in Andoni Local Government Area of River State, Nigeria using the Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Electric Renewables (HOMER) software. In particular, investigation of the possible inclusion of a fuel cell (FC) system is performed. The four considered models are: pv/wind/battery (PWB); pv/wind/battery/gen-set (PWBG), pv/wind/fuel-cell (PWF) and pv/wind/battery/fuel-cell (PWBF). The best cost-effective configuration among the set of systems were examined for the electricity requirement of 677.75 kWh/day primary load with 99.1 kW peak load. Results obtained showed that the net present cost (NPC) are $615,664.95, $679,348.17, $778,834.22 and $3,534,850.54 respectively for the PWB, PWBG, PWBF and PWF. The cost of energy (COE) was lowest for the PWB with a value of $$0.158 and highest for the PWF with a value of $0.964. The renewable options—PWBF and PWF have higher long-term costs but offer cleaner emissions. In contrast, options with the Diesel-Powered Generator is cost-effective but has a high environmental impact in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and noise pollution. These emissions include 3,758 kg/yr CO2, 23.7 kg/yr CO and a total of 32.67 kg/yr of unburned hydrocarbons, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter and nitrogen oxides. Based on the results, a stand - alone HRES that consist of 166 kW PV panels, 3 wind turbines 29 batteries and 123 kW converter is found to be the best configuration for the village, as it leads to minimum net present cost (NPC) and COE. The PWB system offers the best choice for the community by balancing financial considerations with sustainability which is crucial when making energy system choices. Results also show that while hydrogen, FC system and the electrolyzer can be used together with or without batteries, inclusion of the FC system resulted in the high NPC due to their high cost of investment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信