利用气象和化学指标预测 PM2.5 浓度的机器学习模型比较分析

IF 1.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
{"title":"利用气象和化学指标预测 PM2.5 浓度的机器学习模型比较分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Air pollution significantly impacts human health, causing numerous premature deaths, particularly with the rise in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations. Therefore, comparing different machine learning (ML) models for predicting PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration is crucial. This research focuses on six ML models: Linear Regression (LR), Regression Tree (RT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Ensemble Regression (ERT), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Trained on six years of data (July 2015–December 2021) with optimized hyperparameters, the models consider eight meteorological and chemical indicators as PM<sub>2.5</sub> predictors, including temperature, relative humidity, air pressure, O<sub>3</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, dew point, and wind speed. Model efficiency is assessed using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Correlation Coefficient (R), and Coefficient of Determination (R<sup>2</sup>) values. The models achieve R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE values as follows: LR (0.72, 13.52), RT (0.8, 12.156), SVM (0.82, 10.28), ERT (0.81, 11.87), GPR (0.94, 7.65), and ANN (0.99, 2.36). These metrics indicate the superior performance of ANN, with its R<sup>2</sup> value approaching 1 and the lowest RMSE compared to other models. The results highlight the effectiveness of ANN, particularly the model with three hidden layers, in predicting PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration. Utilizing ML models for this purpose is crucial for understanding and mitigating the impacts on human health and the environment, with ANN emerging as a promising tool for various investigations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of machine learning models for predicting PM2.5 concentrations using meteorological and chemical indicators\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Air pollution significantly impacts human health, causing numerous premature deaths, particularly with the rise in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations. Therefore, comparing different machine learning (ML) models for predicting PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration is crucial. This research focuses on six ML models: Linear Regression (LR), Regression Tree (RT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Ensemble Regression (ERT), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Trained on six years of data (July 2015–December 2021) with optimized hyperparameters, the models consider eight meteorological and chemical indicators as PM<sub>2.5</sub> predictors, including temperature, relative humidity, air pressure, O<sub>3</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, dew point, and wind speed. Model efficiency is assessed using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Correlation Coefficient (R), and Coefficient of Determination (R<sup>2</sup>) values. The models achieve R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE values as follows: LR (0.72, 13.52), RT (0.8, 12.156), SVM (0.82, 10.28), ERT (0.81, 11.87), GPR (0.94, 7.65), and ANN (0.99, 2.36). These metrics indicate the superior performance of ANN, with its R<sup>2</sup> value approaching 1 and the lowest RMSE compared to other models. The results highlight the effectiveness of ANN, particularly the model with three hidden layers, in predicting PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration. Utilizing ML models for this purpose is crucial for understanding and mitigating the impacts on human health and the environment, with ANN emerging as a promising tool for various investigations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682624001664\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682624001664","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空气污染严重影响人类健康,导致许多人过早死亡,尤其是随着 PM2.5 浓度的上升。因此,比较不同的机器学习(ML)模型来预测 PM2.5 浓度至关重要。本研究主要关注六种 ML 模型:线性回归(LR)、回归树(RT)、支持向量机(SVM)、集合回归(ERT)、高斯过程回归(GPR)和人工神经网络(ANN)。这些模型以六年(2015 年 7 月至 2021 年 12 月)的数据为基础,采用优化的超参数进行训练,将温度、相对湿度、气压、O3、SO2、NO2、露点和风速等八个气象和化学指标作为 PM2.5 的预测因子。使用平均平方误差 (MSE)、均方根误差 (RMSE)、相关系数 (R) 和判定系数 (R2) 值评估模型效率。模型的 R2 和 RMSE 值如下:LR(0.72,13.52)、RT(0.8,12.156)、SVM(0.82,10.28)、ERT(0.81,11.87)、GPR(0.94,7.65)和 ANN(0.99,2.36)。这些指标表明 ANN 性能优越,其 R2 值接近 1,与其他模型相比 RMSE 最低。这些结果凸显了 ANN,尤其是具有三个隐藏层的模型在预测 PM2.5 浓度方面的有效性。为此目的利用 ML 模型对于了解和减轻对人类健康和环境的影响至关重要,而 ANN 正在成为各种调查的一种有前途的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of machine learning models for predicting PM2.5 concentrations using meteorological and chemical indicators

Air pollution significantly impacts human health, causing numerous premature deaths, particularly with the rise in PM2.5 concentrations. Therefore, comparing different machine learning (ML) models for predicting PM2.5 concentration is crucial. This research focuses on six ML models: Linear Regression (LR), Regression Tree (RT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Ensemble Regression (ERT), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Trained on six years of data (July 2015–December 2021) with optimized hyperparameters, the models consider eight meteorological and chemical indicators as PM2.5 predictors, including temperature, relative humidity, air pressure, O3, SO2, NO2, dew point, and wind speed. Model efficiency is assessed using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Correlation Coefficient (R), and Coefficient of Determination (R2) values. The models achieve R2 and RMSE values as follows: LR (0.72, 13.52), RT (0.8, 12.156), SVM (0.82, 10.28), ERT (0.81, 11.87), GPR (0.94, 7.65), and ANN (0.99, 2.36). These metrics indicate the superior performance of ANN, with its R2 value approaching 1 and the lowest RMSE compared to other models. The results highlight the effectiveness of ANN, particularly the model with three hidden layers, in predicting PM2.5 concentration. Utilizing ML models for this purpose is crucial for understanding and mitigating the impacts on human health and the environment, with ANN emerging as a promising tool for various investigations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics (JASTP) is an international journal concerned with the inter-disciplinary science of the Earth''s atmospheric and space environment, especially the highly varied and highly variable physical phenomena that occur in this natural laboratory and the processes that couple them. The journal covers the physical processes operating in the troposphere, stratosphere, mesosphere, thermosphere, ionosphere, magnetosphere, the Sun, interplanetary medium, and heliosphere. Phenomena occurring in other "spheres", solar influences on climate, and supporting laboratory measurements are also considered. The journal deals especially with the coupling between the different regions. Solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and other energetic events on the Sun create interesting and important perturbations in the near-Earth space environment. The physics of such "space weather" is central to the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics and the journal welcomes papers that lead in the direction of a predictive understanding of the coupled system. Regarding the upper atmosphere, the subjects of aeronomy, geomagnetism and geoelectricity, auroral phenomena, radio wave propagation, and plasma instabilities, are examples within the broad field of solar-terrestrial physics which emphasise the energy exchange between the solar wind, the magnetospheric and ionospheric plasmas, and the neutral gas. In the lower atmosphere, topics covered range from mesoscale to global scale dynamics, to atmospheric electricity, lightning and its effects, and to anthropogenic changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信