基于 DeepLab-EDA 模型的小麦破碎率和杂质率检测方法研究及系统构建

IF 7.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"基于 DeepLab-EDA 模型的小麦破碎率和杂质率检测方法研究及系统构建","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The broken rate and impurity rate of wheat are important indicators for assessing the quality of combine harvester operations. In view of the overlapping, occlusion and dense adhesion between the scattered grains during the operation of the combine harvester, it is difficult to obtain the grain crushing characteristics and impurity mass, which leads to low detection accuracy. In this paper, a method for detecting wheat broken rate and impurity rate based on DeepLab-EDA semantic segmentation model was proposed, and a detection system was built. In the detection system, an image acquisition device was designed and developed based on the principle of electromagnetic vibration, and the deep learning model was deployed in the embedded processor. Through the human–computer interaction interface design, the online processing and analysis of wheat image data and the display of the detection results of broken rate and impurity rate were realized. Comparative experiments with traditional semantic segmentation models showed that the MIoU, MP and MR of the DeepLab-EDA model were 89.41 %, 95.97 % and 94.83 %, respectively, representing improvements of 9.94%, 7.41%, and 7.52% over the baseline model, and indicating a significant enhancement in the accurate identification and segmentation of broken grain and impurities. Based on this, indoor group matching experiments were conducted with three groups of broken rate and impurity rate levels set at 0.5%, 1.5%, and 2.5%, showing the average errors of 7.54% and 6.30% for broken rate and impurity rate detection systems, respectively. Furthermore, the detection device was installed under the grain outlet of the GM80 combine harvester for field experiments, which showed average errors of 13.32% and 9.77% for wheat broken rate and impurity rate, respectively. The effectiveness and accuracy of the wheat broken rate and impurity rate detection system meet the requirements, which can provide a data basis for intelligent control of combine harvester operation parameters by the operator.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on wheat broken rate and impurity rate detection method based on DeepLab-EDA model and system construction\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The broken rate and impurity rate of wheat are important indicators for assessing the quality of combine harvester operations. In view of the overlapping, occlusion and dense adhesion between the scattered grains during the operation of the combine harvester, it is difficult to obtain the grain crushing characteristics and impurity mass, which leads to low detection accuracy. In this paper, a method for detecting wheat broken rate and impurity rate based on DeepLab-EDA semantic segmentation model was proposed, and a detection system was built. In the detection system, an image acquisition device was designed and developed based on the principle of electromagnetic vibration, and the deep learning model was deployed in the embedded processor. Through the human–computer interaction interface design, the online processing and analysis of wheat image data and the display of the detection results of broken rate and impurity rate were realized. Comparative experiments with traditional semantic segmentation models showed that the MIoU, MP and MR of the DeepLab-EDA model were 89.41 %, 95.97 % and 94.83 %, respectively, representing improvements of 9.94%, 7.41%, and 7.52% over the baseline model, and indicating a significant enhancement in the accurate identification and segmentation of broken grain and impurities. Based on this, indoor group matching experiments were conducted with three groups of broken rate and impurity rate levels set at 0.5%, 1.5%, and 2.5%, showing the average errors of 7.54% and 6.30% for broken rate and impurity rate detection systems, respectively. Furthermore, the detection device was installed under the grain outlet of the GM80 combine harvester for field experiments, which showed average errors of 13.32% and 9.77% for wheat broken rate and impurity rate, respectively. The effectiveness and accuracy of the wheat broken rate and impurity rate detection system meet the requirements, which can provide a data basis for intelligent control of combine harvester operation parameters by the operator.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016816992400766X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016816992400766X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小麦的破碎率和含杂率是评价联合收割机作业质量的重要指标。鉴于联合收割机作业过程中,散落的麦粒之间存在重叠、遮挡和密集粘附等现象,难以获得麦粒破碎特征和杂质质量,导致检测精度较低。本文提出了一种基于 DeepLab-EDA 语义分割模型的小麦破碎率和杂质率检测方法,并构建了检测系统。在检测系统中,基于电磁振动原理设计开发了图像采集装置,并在嵌入式处理器中部署了深度学习模型。通过人机交互界面设计,实现了对小麦图像数据的在线处理和分析,以及破碎率和杂质率检测结果的显示。与传统语义分割模型的对比实验表明,DeepLab-EDA模型的MIoU、MP和MR分别为89.41 %、95.97 %和94.83 %,比基线模型分别提高了9.94%、7.41%和7.52%,表明在破碎粒和杂质的准确识别和分割方面有了显著提升。在此基础上,对破碎率和杂质率水平设定为 0.5%、1.5% 和 2.5% 的三组破碎率和杂质率进行了室内组匹配实验,结果显示破碎率和杂质率检测系统的平均误差分别为 7.54% 和 6.30%。此外,将检测装置安装在 GM80 联合收割机的出粮口下方进行田间试验,结果显示小麦破碎率和杂质率的平均误差分别为 13.32% 和 9.77%。小麦破碎率和含杂率检测系统的有效性和准确性均符合要求,可为操作人员智能控制联合收割机的运行参数提供数据依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on wheat broken rate and impurity rate detection method based on DeepLab-EDA model and system construction

The broken rate and impurity rate of wheat are important indicators for assessing the quality of combine harvester operations. In view of the overlapping, occlusion and dense adhesion between the scattered grains during the operation of the combine harvester, it is difficult to obtain the grain crushing characteristics and impurity mass, which leads to low detection accuracy. In this paper, a method for detecting wheat broken rate and impurity rate based on DeepLab-EDA semantic segmentation model was proposed, and a detection system was built. In the detection system, an image acquisition device was designed and developed based on the principle of electromagnetic vibration, and the deep learning model was deployed in the embedded processor. Through the human–computer interaction interface design, the online processing and analysis of wheat image data and the display of the detection results of broken rate and impurity rate were realized. Comparative experiments with traditional semantic segmentation models showed that the MIoU, MP and MR of the DeepLab-EDA model were 89.41 %, 95.97 % and 94.83 %, respectively, representing improvements of 9.94%, 7.41%, and 7.52% over the baseline model, and indicating a significant enhancement in the accurate identification and segmentation of broken grain and impurities. Based on this, indoor group matching experiments were conducted with three groups of broken rate and impurity rate levels set at 0.5%, 1.5%, and 2.5%, showing the average errors of 7.54% and 6.30% for broken rate and impurity rate detection systems, respectively. Furthermore, the detection device was installed under the grain outlet of the GM80 combine harvester for field experiments, which showed average errors of 13.32% and 9.77% for wheat broken rate and impurity rate, respectively. The effectiveness and accuracy of the wheat broken rate and impurity rate detection system meet the requirements, which can provide a data basis for intelligent control of combine harvester operation parameters by the operator.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信