胎儿接受卡马西平、拉莫三嗪、丙戊酸钠或左乙拉西坦单药治疗后的认知功能结果:来自 EURAP 神经认知扩展方案的数据

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Susanna Stjerna , Yfke Huber-Mollema , Torbjörn Tomson , Emilio Perucca , Dina Battino , John Craig , Anne Sabers , Sanjeev Thomas , Frank Vajda , Eija Gaily
{"title":"胎儿接受卡马西平、拉莫三嗪、丙戊酸钠或左乙拉西坦单药治疗后的认知功能结果:来自 EURAP 神经认知扩展方案的数据","authors":"Susanna Stjerna ,&nbsp;Yfke Huber-Mollema ,&nbsp;Torbjörn Tomson ,&nbsp;Emilio Perucca ,&nbsp;Dina Battino ,&nbsp;John Craig ,&nbsp;Anne Sabers ,&nbsp;Sanjeev Thomas ,&nbsp;Frank Vajda ,&nbsp;Eija Gaily","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Prenatal exposure to antiseizure medications (ASMs) has been associated with an increased risk of major malformations and neurodevelopmental disorders, with the latter being mainly associated with valproate (VPA). Our aim was to compare neurocognitive outcome at age 6–7 years in children exposed prenatally to lamotrigine (LTG), carbamazepine (CBZ), valproate (VPA) or levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eligible mother–child pairs were identified from the observational prospective multinational EURAP cohort study. Assessor-blinded testing was conducted at age 6–7 years using WISC-III and NEPSY-II. Verbal IQ (VIQ), performance IQ (PIQ), full scale IQ (FSIQ) and performance in neuropsychological tasks were compared across ASM groups by ANOVA. Scores were adjusted for maternal IQ, paternal education, maternal epilepsy type and child sex.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 169 children enrolled in the study, 162 (LTG n = 80, CBZ n = 37, VPA n = 27, LEV n = 18) had sufficient data from WISC-III, NEPSY-II or both, and were included in the analyses. Observed (unadjusted) PIQ and FSIQ did not differ across exposure groups, but a difference was identified for VIQ (P&lt;0.05), with children exposed to VPA having lower scores than children exposed to LEV (P&lt;0.05) and children from all groups combined (P&lt;0.01). Adjusted VIQ, PIQ and FSIQ scores did not differ significantly across groups, but VPA-exposed children had borderline significantly lower adjusted VIQ scores than children from all groups combined (P=0.051). VPA-exposed children had lower scores in comprehension of instructions before and after adjustment for confounding variables than children exposed to LTG (P&lt;0.001), LEV (P&lt;0.01) or children from all groups combined (p &lt; 0.001). The VPA-exposed group also had lower scores in immediate and delayed memory for faces compared to children exposed to CBZ (P&lt;0.05 and P&lt;0.001, respectively) and LTG (P&lt;0.05 and P&lt;0.02, respectively), and children from all groups combined (P&lt;0.02 and P&lt;0.001, respectively). LEV-exposed children had lower scores in delayed memory for names than children exposed to LTG (P&lt;0.001), CBZ (P&lt;0.001), VPA (P&lt;0.05) and children from all groups combined (P&lt;0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Consistent with previous reports, our results provide evidence for an adverse effect of prenatal exposure to valproate on verbal development. Our finding of relatively weaker performance of VPA-exposed children compared to other ASM exposures in both comprehension of instructions and face memory also suggest that children of mothers treated with VPA are at increased risk for compromised memory functions or altered processing of socially relevant information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024004062/pdfft?md5=7fcc06f546c07dd43c50714a7848e2ac&pid=1-s2.0-S1525505024004062-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive outcomes after fetal exposure to carbamazepine, lamotrigine, valproate or levetiracetam monotherapy: Data from the EURAP neurocognitive extension protocol\",\"authors\":\"Susanna Stjerna ,&nbsp;Yfke Huber-Mollema ,&nbsp;Torbjörn Tomson ,&nbsp;Emilio Perucca ,&nbsp;Dina Battino ,&nbsp;John Craig ,&nbsp;Anne Sabers ,&nbsp;Sanjeev Thomas ,&nbsp;Frank Vajda ,&nbsp;Eija Gaily\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Prenatal exposure to antiseizure medications (ASMs) has been associated with an increased risk of major malformations and neurodevelopmental disorders, with the latter being mainly associated with valproate (VPA). Our aim was to compare neurocognitive outcome at age 6–7 years in children exposed prenatally to lamotrigine (LTG), carbamazepine (CBZ), valproate (VPA) or levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eligible mother–child pairs were identified from the observational prospective multinational EURAP cohort study. Assessor-blinded testing was conducted at age 6–7 years using WISC-III and NEPSY-II. Verbal IQ (VIQ), performance IQ (PIQ), full scale IQ (FSIQ) and performance in neuropsychological tasks were compared across ASM groups by ANOVA. Scores were adjusted for maternal IQ, paternal education, maternal epilepsy type and child sex.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 169 children enrolled in the study, 162 (LTG n = 80, CBZ n = 37, VPA n = 27, LEV n = 18) had sufficient data from WISC-III, NEPSY-II or both, and were included in the analyses. Observed (unadjusted) PIQ and FSIQ did not differ across exposure groups, but a difference was identified for VIQ (P&lt;0.05), with children exposed to VPA having lower scores than children exposed to LEV (P&lt;0.05) and children from all groups combined (P&lt;0.01). Adjusted VIQ, PIQ and FSIQ scores did not differ significantly across groups, but VPA-exposed children had borderline significantly lower adjusted VIQ scores than children from all groups combined (P=0.051). VPA-exposed children had lower scores in comprehension of instructions before and after adjustment for confounding variables than children exposed to LTG (P&lt;0.001), LEV (P&lt;0.01) or children from all groups combined (p &lt; 0.001). The VPA-exposed group also had lower scores in immediate and delayed memory for faces compared to children exposed to CBZ (P&lt;0.05 and P&lt;0.001, respectively) and LTG (P&lt;0.05 and P&lt;0.02, respectively), and children from all groups combined (P&lt;0.02 and P&lt;0.001, respectively). LEV-exposed children had lower scores in delayed memory for names than children exposed to LTG (P&lt;0.001), CBZ (P&lt;0.001), VPA (P&lt;0.05) and children from all groups combined (P&lt;0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Consistent with previous reports, our results provide evidence for an adverse effect of prenatal exposure to valproate on verbal development. Our finding of relatively weaker performance of VPA-exposed children compared to other ASM exposures in both comprehension of instructions and face memory also suggest that children of mothers treated with VPA are at increased risk for compromised memory functions or altered processing of socially relevant information.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024004062/pdfft?md5=7fcc06f546c07dd43c50714a7848e2ac&pid=1-s2.0-S1525505024004062-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024004062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024004062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 产前暴露于抗癫痫药物(ASMs)与重大畸形和神经发育障碍的风险增加有关,后者主要与丙戊酸钠(VPA)有关。我们的目的是比较产前接受拉莫三嗪(LTG)、卡马西平(CBZ)、丙戊酸钠(VPA)或左乙拉西坦(LEV)单药治疗的儿童在6-7岁时的神经认知结果。在 6-7 岁时使用 WISC-III 和 NEPSY-II 进行了评估者盲法测试。通过方差分析比较了各 ASM 组的言语智商 (VIQ)、表现智商 (PIQ)、全面智商 (FSIQ) 和神经心理学任务表现。结果 在参加研究的 169 名儿童中,有 162 名(LTG n = 80、CBZ n = 37、VPA n = 27、LEV n = 18)儿童在 WISC-III、NEPSY-II 或两者中获得了足够的数据,并被纳入分析。观察到的(未调整的)PIQ 和 FSIQ 在不同暴露组之间没有差异,但 VIQ 存在差异(P<0.05),暴露于 VPA 的儿童的分数低于暴露于 LEV 的儿童(P<0.05),也低于所有暴露组儿童的总和(P<0.01)。调整后的VIQ、PIQ和FSIQ得分在各组之间没有显著差异,但暴露于VPA的儿童的调整后VIQ得分比所有组别儿童的总和略低(P=0.051)。在调整混杂变量之前和之后,暴露于 VPA 的儿童在理解指令方面的得分均低于暴露于 LTG(P<0.001)、LEV(P<0.01)或所有组别的儿童(P<0.001)。与暴露于 CBZ(P<0.05 和 P<0.001,分别为 0.05 和 P<0.02)和 LTG(P<0.05 和 P<0.02,分别为 0.05 和 P<0.001)的儿童以及所有组别的儿童相比,暴露于 VPA 的儿童在面孔即时记忆和延迟记忆方面的得分也较低(P<0.02 和 P<0.001,分别为 0.02 和 P<0.001)。与之前的报告一致,我们的结果提供了证据,证明产前接触丙戊酸钠会对言语发育产生不良影响。我们发现,与其他 ASM 暴露相比,VPA 暴露儿童在指令理解和面孔记忆方面的表现相对较弱,这也表明,母亲接受 VPA 治疗的儿童的记忆功能受损或社会相关信息处理能力改变的风险会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive outcomes after fetal exposure to carbamazepine, lamotrigine, valproate or levetiracetam monotherapy: Data from the EURAP neurocognitive extension protocol

Purpose

Prenatal exposure to antiseizure medications (ASMs) has been associated with an increased risk of major malformations and neurodevelopmental disorders, with the latter being mainly associated with valproate (VPA). Our aim was to compare neurocognitive outcome at age 6–7 years in children exposed prenatally to lamotrigine (LTG), carbamazepine (CBZ), valproate (VPA) or levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy.

Methods

Eligible mother–child pairs were identified from the observational prospective multinational EURAP cohort study. Assessor-blinded testing was conducted at age 6–7 years using WISC-III and NEPSY-II. Verbal IQ (VIQ), performance IQ (PIQ), full scale IQ (FSIQ) and performance in neuropsychological tasks were compared across ASM groups by ANOVA. Scores were adjusted for maternal IQ, paternal education, maternal epilepsy type and child sex.

Results

Of 169 children enrolled in the study, 162 (LTG n = 80, CBZ n = 37, VPA n = 27, LEV n = 18) had sufficient data from WISC-III, NEPSY-II or both, and were included in the analyses. Observed (unadjusted) PIQ and FSIQ did not differ across exposure groups, but a difference was identified for VIQ (P<0.05), with children exposed to VPA having lower scores than children exposed to LEV (P<0.05) and children from all groups combined (P<0.01). Adjusted VIQ, PIQ and FSIQ scores did not differ significantly across groups, but VPA-exposed children had borderline significantly lower adjusted VIQ scores than children from all groups combined (P=0.051). VPA-exposed children had lower scores in comprehension of instructions before and after adjustment for confounding variables than children exposed to LTG (P<0.001), LEV (P<0.01) or children from all groups combined (p < 0.001). The VPA-exposed group also had lower scores in immediate and delayed memory for faces compared to children exposed to CBZ (P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively) and LTG (P<0.05 and P<0.02, respectively), and children from all groups combined (P<0.02 and P<0.001, respectively). LEV-exposed children had lower scores in delayed memory for names than children exposed to LTG (P<0.001), CBZ (P<0.001), VPA (P<0.05) and children from all groups combined (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Consistent with previous reports, our results provide evidence for an adverse effect of prenatal exposure to valproate on verbal development. Our finding of relatively weaker performance of VPA-exposed children compared to other ASM exposures in both comprehension of instructions and face memory also suggest that children of mothers treated with VPA are at increased risk for compromised memory functions or altered processing of socially relevant information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信