{"title":"环境正义指标:评估其在确定饮用水违规风险社区方面的有效性","authors":"Rae Cade , Danlin Yu , Kyle Whyte , Pankaj Lal , Cortni Borgerson","doi":"10.1016/j.clwat.2024.100035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite improvements to environmental protection initiatives, millions of Black, Indigenous, and other people of color (BIPOC) continue to live in communities that are disproportionately affected by environmental contamination. Environmental Justice (EJ) screening tools, such as CalEnviroScreen, EJ Map, and PennEnviroScreen, have been developed to help state and federal governments gauge the extent of EJ in their jurisdictions. These screening tools have propelled the EJ advocacy initiative, illustrating the historic and ongoing disproportionate effects of contamination in many BIPOC communities. Yet, screening tools and their indicators vary, and we must understand how these tools and indicator choices differently identify at-risk communities, including those facing drinking water violations. We investigate how indicator choices differently identify and affect communities facing such violations. Specifically, we examine how EJ screening tools differently identify at-risk communities experiencing drinking water violations, which indicators drive these differences, and how indicator choice affects community identification. Our analysis reveals that EJ screen indicators preferentially identify at-risk, low-income, unemployed, BIPOC renters. However, additional indicators such as middle-income and food insecurity/SNAP can expand identification to ensure actions reach neglected communities. By developing and enhancing EJ screening tools, we can better determine which drinking water violations are present, identify who is being affected by them, and better direct our mitigation efforts to communities in need of assistance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100257,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Water","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950263224000334/pdfft?md5=1ec5325356495fb91a10369348a62c1b&pid=1-s2.0-S2950263224000334-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental justice indicators: Evaluating their effectiveness in identifying at-risk communities for drinking water violations\",\"authors\":\"Rae Cade , Danlin Yu , Kyle Whyte , Pankaj Lal , Cortni Borgerson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clwat.2024.100035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite improvements to environmental protection initiatives, millions of Black, Indigenous, and other people of color (BIPOC) continue to live in communities that are disproportionately affected by environmental contamination. Environmental Justice (EJ) screening tools, such as CalEnviroScreen, EJ Map, and PennEnviroScreen, have been developed to help state and federal governments gauge the extent of EJ in their jurisdictions. These screening tools have propelled the EJ advocacy initiative, illustrating the historic and ongoing disproportionate effects of contamination in many BIPOC communities. Yet, screening tools and their indicators vary, and we must understand how these tools and indicator choices differently identify at-risk communities, including those facing drinking water violations. We investigate how indicator choices differently identify and affect communities facing such violations. Specifically, we examine how EJ screening tools differently identify at-risk communities experiencing drinking water violations, which indicators drive these differences, and how indicator choice affects community identification. Our analysis reveals that EJ screen indicators preferentially identify at-risk, low-income, unemployed, BIPOC renters. However, additional indicators such as middle-income and food insecurity/SNAP can expand identification to ensure actions reach neglected communities. By developing and enhancing EJ screening tools, we can better determine which drinking water violations are present, identify who is being affected by them, and better direct our mitigation efforts to communities in need of assistance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Water\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950263224000334/pdfft?md5=1ec5325356495fb91a10369348a62c1b&pid=1-s2.0-S2950263224000334-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950263224000334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950263224000334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管环境保护措施有所改善,但仍有数百万黑人、土著人和其他有色人种 (BIPOC) 生活在受环境污染影响尤为严重的社区。环境正义(EJ)筛查工具,如 CalEnviroScreen、EJ Map 和 PennEnviroScreen,已被开发出来,以帮助州政府和联邦政府衡量其管辖范围内的环境正义程度。这些筛查工具推动了环境正义宣传倡议,说明了污染在许多黑人、印地安人和阿什卡利人社区的历史性和持续性过度影响。然而,筛查工具及其指标各不相同,我们必须了解这些工具和指标选择如何以不同方式识别高风险社区,包括面临饮用水违规问题的社区。我们研究了指标选择如何以不同方式识别并影响面临此类违规行为的社区。具体来说,我们研究了 EJ 筛选工具如何以不同方式识别面临饮用水违规问题的高危社区,哪些指标会导致这些差异,以及指标选择如何影响社区识别。我们的分析表明,EJ 筛选指标优先识别高风险、低收入、失业、BIPOC 租房者。然而,中等收入和食品不安全/SNAP 等附加指标可以扩大识别范围,确保行动惠及被忽视的社区。通过开发和增强 EJ 筛选工具,我们可以更好地确定哪些饮用水违规现象存在,识别受其影响的人群,并更好地将我们的缓解工作引向需要帮助的社区。
Environmental justice indicators: Evaluating their effectiveness in identifying at-risk communities for drinking water violations
Despite improvements to environmental protection initiatives, millions of Black, Indigenous, and other people of color (BIPOC) continue to live in communities that are disproportionately affected by environmental contamination. Environmental Justice (EJ) screening tools, such as CalEnviroScreen, EJ Map, and PennEnviroScreen, have been developed to help state and federal governments gauge the extent of EJ in their jurisdictions. These screening tools have propelled the EJ advocacy initiative, illustrating the historic and ongoing disproportionate effects of contamination in many BIPOC communities. Yet, screening tools and their indicators vary, and we must understand how these tools and indicator choices differently identify at-risk communities, including those facing drinking water violations. We investigate how indicator choices differently identify and affect communities facing such violations. Specifically, we examine how EJ screening tools differently identify at-risk communities experiencing drinking water violations, which indicators drive these differences, and how indicator choice affects community identification. Our analysis reveals that EJ screen indicators preferentially identify at-risk, low-income, unemployed, BIPOC renters. However, additional indicators such as middle-income and food insecurity/SNAP can expand identification to ensure actions reach neglected communities. By developing and enhancing EJ screening tools, we can better determine which drinking water violations are present, identify who is being affected by them, and better direct our mitigation efforts to communities in need of assistance.