为市政林业监测绘制树冠覆盖图:利用免费大地遥感卫星图像和机器学习

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
{"title":"为市政林业监测绘制树冠覆盖图:利用免费大地遥感卫星图像和机器学习","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Trees across the urban-rural continuum are recognized for their ecological importance and ecosystem services. Municipalities often utilize spatial canopy cover data for monitoring this resource. Monitoring frameworks typically rely on fine-scale maps derived from very high spatial resolution sensors, which are high quality but expensive and unwieldy for consistent wide-area monitoring. In this paper, we explore how free Landsat imagery, supported by very high-resolution imagery interpretation and/or digital hemispherical photographs, can be used to effectively map canopy cover at a scale appropriate for municipal monitoring. We compare linear models and random forest machine learning for predicting canopy cover across a landscape (general) and within specific land covers (specialized). We create 2018 canopy cover maps and track progress towards forestry objectives in a region of southern Ontario, Canada. Random forest models using all reference data perform best for general use (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.90, RMSE: 10.1 %), separating non-canopy vegetation (e.g., agricultural fields) from tree canopy. Specialized models are useful in forest land cover patches, where hemispherical photographs relate with Landsat at a moderate strength (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.67, RMSE: 2.73 %), and in residential areas, capturing the totality of canopy cover variation (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.85, RMSE: 5.66 %). Accuracy was assessed with standard cross-validation, which is useful given limited resources. However, following best practice, an independent reference sample was also leveraged to assess the best general model (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.86, RMSE: 11.4 %), indicating that cross-validation was slightly overoptimistic. Results show that Caledon, a rural-dominant municipality within the study area, is the greenest (34 % canopy cover). The two cities (Brampton and Mississauga) have 15.9 % and 17.5 % canopy cover. Residential canopy criteria indicate “Good” performance in Caledon, “Moderate” in Mississauga, and “Low” in Brampton based on our 2018 assessment. The methods described here can provide municipalities with a low-cost approach for tree canopy monitoring across complex landscapes.</p></div><div><h3>Data availability</h3><p>The data used for this paper are available at: <span><span>https://zenodo.org/records/12549244</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. The code created for this paper are available at: <span><span>https://github.com/ZZMitch/PredictTreeCC_Landsat_1972to2020</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724002887/pdfft?md5=9e6dc14b18b5f45035f72facf0f74b15&pid=1-s2.0-S1618866724002887-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping canopy cover for municipal forestry monitoring: Using free Landsat imagery and machine learning\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Trees across the urban-rural continuum are recognized for their ecological importance and ecosystem services. Municipalities often utilize spatial canopy cover data for monitoring this resource. Monitoring frameworks typically rely on fine-scale maps derived from very high spatial resolution sensors, which are high quality but expensive and unwieldy for consistent wide-area monitoring. In this paper, we explore how free Landsat imagery, supported by very high-resolution imagery interpretation and/or digital hemispherical photographs, can be used to effectively map canopy cover at a scale appropriate for municipal monitoring. We compare linear models and random forest machine learning for predicting canopy cover across a landscape (general) and within specific land covers (specialized). We create 2018 canopy cover maps and track progress towards forestry objectives in a region of southern Ontario, Canada. Random forest models using all reference data perform best for general use (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.90, RMSE: 10.1 %), separating non-canopy vegetation (e.g., agricultural fields) from tree canopy. Specialized models are useful in forest land cover patches, where hemispherical photographs relate with Landsat at a moderate strength (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.67, RMSE: 2.73 %), and in residential areas, capturing the totality of canopy cover variation (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.85, RMSE: 5.66 %). Accuracy was assessed with standard cross-validation, which is useful given limited resources. However, following best practice, an independent reference sample was also leveraged to assess the best general model (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.86, RMSE: 11.4 %), indicating that cross-validation was slightly overoptimistic. Results show that Caledon, a rural-dominant municipality within the study area, is the greenest (34 % canopy cover). The two cities (Brampton and Mississauga) have 15.9 % and 17.5 % canopy cover. Residential canopy criteria indicate “Good” performance in Caledon, “Moderate” in Mississauga, and “Low” in Brampton based on our 2018 assessment. The methods described here can provide municipalities with a low-cost approach for tree canopy monitoring across complex landscapes.</p></div><div><h3>Data availability</h3><p>The data used for this paper are available at: <span><span>https://zenodo.org/records/12549244</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. The code created for this paper are available at: <span><span>https://github.com/ZZMitch/PredictTreeCC_Landsat_1972to2020</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724002887/pdfft?md5=9e6dc14b18b5f45035f72facf0f74b15&pid=1-s2.0-S1618866724002887-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724002887\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724002887","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市和农村之间的树木因其生态重要性和生态系统服务而得到认可。市政当局通常利用空间树冠覆盖数据来监测这一资源。监测框架通常依赖于从空间分辨率极高的传感器中获得的精细地图,这些地图质量高,但价格昂贵,而且不便于大面积持续监测。在本文中,我们探讨了如何利用免费的大地遥感卫星图像,并辅以高分辨率图像判读和/或数字半球照片,有效地绘制出适合市政监测的树冠覆盖图。我们比较了线性模型和随机森林机器学习在预测整个景观(一般)和特定土地覆盖(特殊)内的冠层覆盖率方面的优势。我们绘制了 2018 年树冠覆盖图,并跟踪加拿大安大略省南部地区实现林业目标的进展情况。使用所有参考数据的随机森林模型在一般用途中表现最佳(R2:0.90,RMSE:10.1%),可将非树冠植被(如农田)与树冠分开。在森林植被斑块中,半球照片与大地遥感卫星的关联度适中(R2:0.67,均方根误差:2.73 %),在居民区,捕捉树冠覆盖的整体变化(R2:0.85,均方根误差:5.66 %),专业模型非常有用。精确度通过标准交叉验证进行评估,这在资源有限的情况下非常有用。不过,按照最佳做法,还利用独立参考样本来评估最佳一般模型(R2:0.86,RMSE:11.4 %),这表明交叉验证略微过于乐观。结果显示,研究区域内以农村为主的卡利登市绿化程度最高(34% 的树冠覆盖率)。两个城市(布兰普顿和密西沙加)的树冠覆盖率分别为 15.9% 和 17.5%。根据我们 2018 年的评估,住宅树冠标准显示卡利登的表现为 "良好",密西沙加为 "中等",而布兰普顿为 "低"。本文介绍的方法可为市政当局提供一种低成本的方法,用于监测复杂景观中的树冠。数据可用性本文使用的数据可在以下网址获取:https://zenodo.org/records/12549244。为本文创建的代码可从以下网址获取:https://github.com/ZZMitch/PredictTreeCC_Landsat_1972to2020。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping canopy cover for municipal forestry monitoring: Using free Landsat imagery and machine learning

Trees across the urban-rural continuum are recognized for their ecological importance and ecosystem services. Municipalities often utilize spatial canopy cover data for monitoring this resource. Monitoring frameworks typically rely on fine-scale maps derived from very high spatial resolution sensors, which are high quality but expensive and unwieldy for consistent wide-area monitoring. In this paper, we explore how free Landsat imagery, supported by very high-resolution imagery interpretation and/or digital hemispherical photographs, can be used to effectively map canopy cover at a scale appropriate for municipal monitoring. We compare linear models and random forest machine learning for predicting canopy cover across a landscape (general) and within specific land covers (specialized). We create 2018 canopy cover maps and track progress towards forestry objectives in a region of southern Ontario, Canada. Random forest models using all reference data perform best for general use (R2: 0.90, RMSE: 10.1 %), separating non-canopy vegetation (e.g., agricultural fields) from tree canopy. Specialized models are useful in forest land cover patches, where hemispherical photographs relate with Landsat at a moderate strength (R2: 0.67, RMSE: 2.73 %), and in residential areas, capturing the totality of canopy cover variation (R2: 0.85, RMSE: 5.66 %). Accuracy was assessed with standard cross-validation, which is useful given limited resources. However, following best practice, an independent reference sample was also leveraged to assess the best general model (R2: 0.86, RMSE: 11.4 %), indicating that cross-validation was slightly overoptimistic. Results show that Caledon, a rural-dominant municipality within the study area, is the greenest (34 % canopy cover). The two cities (Brampton and Mississauga) have 15.9 % and 17.5 % canopy cover. Residential canopy criteria indicate “Good” performance in Caledon, “Moderate” in Mississauga, and “Low” in Brampton based on our 2018 assessment. The methods described here can provide municipalities with a low-cost approach for tree canopy monitoring across complex landscapes.

Data availability

The data used for this paper are available at: https://zenodo.org/records/12549244. The code created for this paper are available at: https://github.com/ZZMitch/PredictTreeCC_Landsat_1972to2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信