与草本田畦相比,无论作物是否大量开花,油菜花田畦每周每公里净输出超过 82,000 只食蚜蝇到油菜花作物中

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rachel Pizante, John H. Acorn, I. Pilar Jiménez, Carol M. Frost
{"title":"与草本田畦相比,无论作物是否大量开花,油菜花田畦每周每公里净输出超过 82,000 只食蚜蝇到油菜花作物中","authors":"Rachel Pizante,&nbsp;John H. Acorn,&nbsp;I. Pilar Jiménez,&nbsp;Carol M. Frost","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) provide dual ecosystem services, as the adults act as pollinators and the larvae can be predators of crop pests. Because bloom time is limited in mass-flowering crops, resources within crops for hoverfly adults can also be limited and change temporally. Therefore, hoverflies need to move between crops and their borders. It may be that some field border vegetation types support the provision of hoverflies to crops better than other vegetation types. We sought to determine how field border type (herbaceous vs. treed), canola bloom, and border vegetation structure and composition (border width, canopy cover, grass height, grass cover, plant cover, flower availability, and density of trees, shrubs, snags, stumps, and downed woody debris) affect hoverfly movement into and out of crop fields from field borders. We placed bi-directional Malaise traps in herbaceous and treed field borders at 10 fields seeded with canola, and sampled continuously from May 17 to August 20, 2021 in central Alberta, Canada. We found that field border type affected hoverfly movement such that, across the whole summer, net-export of hoverflies into crops was over 33-times higher from treed field borders (an estimated 84,699 hoverflies per km per week) than from herbaceous field borders (an estimated 2515 hoverflies per km per week). We did not find any single component of the vegetation within treed field borders that explained the difference in movement. We found more hoverfly activity in herbaceous field borders than in treed field borders during and after canola bloom, but that overall activity was equal between field border types prior to canola bloom. Treed borders had greater Hill-Shannon and Hill-Simpson diversity and evenness than herbaceous borders. Throughout the growing season, the community became dominated by <em>Toxomerus marginatus</em>, which drove all temporal trends. We conclude that treed field borders act as net exporters of hoverflies to canola fields and are therefore important features for optimizing the magnitude of the ecosystem services provided by hoverflies in agricultural systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"377 ","pages":"Article 109271"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092400389X/pdfft?md5=8957578303dd40175f976441f4691127&pid=1-s2.0-S016788092400389X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treed field borders net-export over 82,000 more hoverflies per km every week into canola crops than herbaceous field borders, regardless of mass-flowering crop bloom\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Pizante,&nbsp;John H. Acorn,&nbsp;I. Pilar Jiménez,&nbsp;Carol M. Frost\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) provide dual ecosystem services, as the adults act as pollinators and the larvae can be predators of crop pests. Because bloom time is limited in mass-flowering crops, resources within crops for hoverfly adults can also be limited and change temporally. Therefore, hoverflies need to move between crops and their borders. It may be that some field border vegetation types support the provision of hoverflies to crops better than other vegetation types. We sought to determine how field border type (herbaceous vs. treed), canola bloom, and border vegetation structure and composition (border width, canopy cover, grass height, grass cover, plant cover, flower availability, and density of trees, shrubs, snags, stumps, and downed woody debris) affect hoverfly movement into and out of crop fields from field borders. We placed bi-directional Malaise traps in herbaceous and treed field borders at 10 fields seeded with canola, and sampled continuously from May 17 to August 20, 2021 in central Alberta, Canada. We found that field border type affected hoverfly movement such that, across the whole summer, net-export of hoverflies into crops was over 33-times higher from treed field borders (an estimated 84,699 hoverflies per km per week) than from herbaceous field borders (an estimated 2515 hoverflies per km per week). We did not find any single component of the vegetation within treed field borders that explained the difference in movement. We found more hoverfly activity in herbaceous field borders than in treed field borders during and after canola bloom, but that overall activity was equal between field border types prior to canola bloom. Treed borders had greater Hill-Shannon and Hill-Simpson diversity and evenness than herbaceous borders. Throughout the growing season, the community became dominated by <em>Toxomerus marginatus</em>, which drove all temporal trends. We conclude that treed field borders act as net exporters of hoverflies to canola fields and are therefore important features for optimizing the magnitude of the ecosystem services provided by hoverflies in agricultural systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"volume\":\"377 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092400389X/pdfft?md5=8957578303dd40175f976441f4691127&pid=1-s2.0-S016788092400389X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092400389X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092400389X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食蚜蝇(双翅目:蚜科)提供双重生态系统服务,成虫是授粉昆虫,幼虫则是作物害虫的天敌。由于大量开花作物的花期有限,食蚜蝇成虫在作物内的资源也会受到限制并随时间变化。因此,食蚜蝇需要在作物及其边界之间移动。与其他植被类型相比,某些田间边界植被类型可能更有利于为农作物提供食蚜蝇。我们试图确定田畦类型(草本植物与乔木)、油菜花期、田畦植被结构和组成(田畦宽度、树冠覆盖度、草高、草盖度、植被覆盖度、花的可利用性以及树木、灌木、矮树丛、树桩和倒伏的木质碎屑的密度)如何影响食蚜蝇从田畦进出作物田。我们在加拿大艾伯塔省中部播种了油菜籽的 10 块田地的草本植物和树木田畦中放置了双向 Malaise 诱捕器,并于 2021 年 5 月 17 日至 8 月 20 日期间连续采样。我们发现,田畦类型会影响食蚜蝇的活动,因此在整个夏季,从有树田畦(估计每周每公里有 84,699 只食蚜蝇)向作物净输出的食蚜蝇数量是从草本田畦(估计每周每公里有 2515 只食蚜蝇)输出的食蚜蝇数量的 33 倍以上。我们没有发现植被中的任何单一成分可以解释这种运动差异。我们发现,在油菜花盛开期间和之后,草本田畦中的食蚜蝇活动量要比林木田畦中的多,但在油菜花盛开之前,不同类型田畦中的食蚜蝇总体活动量相同。与草本田畦相比,乔木田畦的希尔-香农和希尔-辛普森多样性和均匀度更高。在整个生长季节,油菜花边缘毒蛾(Toxomerus marginatus)在群落中占据主导地位,它主导了所有的时间趋势。我们的结论是,有树木的田间边界是油菜花田食蚜蝇的净输出地,因此是优化农业系统中食蚜蝇提供的生态系统服务的重要特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treed field borders net-export over 82,000 more hoverflies per km every week into canola crops than herbaceous field borders, regardless of mass-flowering crop bloom

Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) provide dual ecosystem services, as the adults act as pollinators and the larvae can be predators of crop pests. Because bloom time is limited in mass-flowering crops, resources within crops for hoverfly adults can also be limited and change temporally. Therefore, hoverflies need to move between crops and their borders. It may be that some field border vegetation types support the provision of hoverflies to crops better than other vegetation types. We sought to determine how field border type (herbaceous vs. treed), canola bloom, and border vegetation structure and composition (border width, canopy cover, grass height, grass cover, plant cover, flower availability, and density of trees, shrubs, snags, stumps, and downed woody debris) affect hoverfly movement into and out of crop fields from field borders. We placed bi-directional Malaise traps in herbaceous and treed field borders at 10 fields seeded with canola, and sampled continuously from May 17 to August 20, 2021 in central Alberta, Canada. We found that field border type affected hoverfly movement such that, across the whole summer, net-export of hoverflies into crops was over 33-times higher from treed field borders (an estimated 84,699 hoverflies per km per week) than from herbaceous field borders (an estimated 2515 hoverflies per km per week). We did not find any single component of the vegetation within treed field borders that explained the difference in movement. We found more hoverfly activity in herbaceous field borders than in treed field borders during and after canola bloom, but that overall activity was equal between field border types prior to canola bloom. Treed borders had greater Hill-Shannon and Hill-Simpson diversity and evenness than herbaceous borders. Throughout the growing season, the community became dominated by Toxomerus marginatus, which drove all temporal trends. We conclude that treed field borders act as net exporters of hoverflies to canola fields and are therefore important features for optimizing the magnitude of the ecosystem services provided by hoverflies in agricultural systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信