一致性与相互关系:大肠癌患者及其配偶照顾者主观认知障碍的二元视角。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Ye Wang , Xiaoke Qiu , Yi Zhang , Rongyu Li , Zheng Sun , Qiuping Li
{"title":"一致性与相互关系:大肠癌患者及其配偶照顾者主观认知障碍的二元视角。","authors":"Ye Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoke Qiu ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang ,&nbsp;Rongyu Li ,&nbsp;Zheng Sun ,&nbsp;Qiuping Li","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) reported experiencing subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), and their spousal caregivers perceived the patients’ SCI. This cross-sectional study assessed the congruence of SCI between the patients’ self-reports and the spousal caregivers’ perceptions and examined the factors affecting SCI from the dyadic perspective.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 200 dyads of patients with CRC and their spousal caregivers were invited to complete the survey, which evaluated the SCI, dyadic coping (DC), quality of life, anxiety, and depression for the dyads. Congruence was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired-sample <em>t</em> test. Impacting factors analysis was conducted using Pearson correlations, hierarchical multiple regression, and actor–partner interdependence mediation model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The congruency of SCI between the patient-reported and the spouse-perceived ranged from moderate to good (ICC = 0.75 to 0.86). After controlling demographic variables (the patients’ gender and spouses’ work status), the DC of both patients and spousal caregivers, and the emotional health of patients were significant predictors for patients’ SCI (all <em>P</em> &lt; .05). In the actor–partner interdependence mediation model, there was an actor effect between DC and SCI for both patients and spousal caregivers and a partner effect between DC and SCI for patients. Moreover, patients’ emotional health (anxiety and depression) had the mediating effect between DC and SCI for both patients and spousal caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Spousal caregivers played a vital role in assessment and management in the SCI of patients. The DC of patients and spousal caregivers and the emotional health of patients (eg, anxiety and depression) were major predictors for the SCI of patients.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing</h3><p>Nursing providers should consider the importance of patients’ and spousal caregivers’ perspectives in assessing and managing SCI. This study supports nurses focusing on the congruence and interrelationship of SCI to enhance DC for CRC patients and their spousal caregivers. This approach aims to reduce emotional distress and develop cognitive interventions from a dyadic perspective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Congruence and Interrelationship: A Dyadic Perspective on the Subjective Cognitive Impairment in the Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Their Spousal Caregivers\",\"authors\":\"Ye Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoke Qiu ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang ,&nbsp;Rongyu Li ,&nbsp;Zheng Sun ,&nbsp;Qiuping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) reported experiencing subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), and their spousal caregivers perceived the patients’ SCI. This cross-sectional study assessed the congruence of SCI between the patients’ self-reports and the spousal caregivers’ perceptions and examined the factors affecting SCI from the dyadic perspective.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 200 dyads of patients with CRC and their spousal caregivers were invited to complete the survey, which evaluated the SCI, dyadic coping (DC), quality of life, anxiety, and depression for the dyads. Congruence was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired-sample <em>t</em> test. Impacting factors analysis was conducted using Pearson correlations, hierarchical multiple regression, and actor–partner interdependence mediation model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The congruency of SCI between the patient-reported and the spouse-perceived ranged from moderate to good (ICC = 0.75 to 0.86). After controlling demographic variables (the patients’ gender and spouses’ work status), the DC of both patients and spousal caregivers, and the emotional health of patients were significant predictors for patients’ SCI (all <em>P</em> &lt; .05). In the actor–partner interdependence mediation model, there was an actor effect between DC and SCI for both patients and spousal caregivers and a partner effect between DC and SCI for patients. Moreover, patients’ emotional health (anxiety and depression) had the mediating effect between DC and SCI for both patients and spousal caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Spousal caregivers played a vital role in assessment and management in the SCI of patients. The DC of patients and spousal caregivers and the emotional health of patients (eg, anxiety and depression) were major predictors for the SCI of patients.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing</h3><p>Nursing providers should consider the importance of patients’ and spousal caregivers’ perspectives in assessing and managing SCI. This study supports nurses focusing on the congruence and interrelationship of SCI to enhance DC for CRC patients and their spousal caregivers. This approach aims to reduce emotional distress and develop cognitive interventions from a dyadic perspective.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074920812400192X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074920812400192X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的结肠直肠癌(CRC)患者自述有主观认知障碍(SCI),而其配偶护理人员则认为患者有主观认知障碍。这项横断面研究评估了患者自我报告与配偶照顾者感知的 SCI 之间的一致性,并从夫妇的角度研究了影响 SCI 的因素:共邀请了 200 对 CRC 患者及其配偶照顾者完成调查,评估了他们的 SCI、伴侣应对(DC)、生活质量、焦虑和抑郁情况。采用类内相关系数(ICC)和配对样本 t 检验分析一致性。影响因素分析采用了皮尔逊相关、分层多元回归和行为者-伴侣相互依赖中介模型:患者报告的 SCI 与配偶感知的 SCI 之间的一致性从中等到良好不等(ICC = 0.75 至 0.86)。在控制了人口统计学变量(患者的性别和配偶的工作状况)后,患者和配偶照顾者的直流电以及患者的情绪健康对患者的 SCI 有显著的预测作用(所有 P < .05)。在行为者-伙伴相互依赖中介模型中,患者和配偶照顾者的 DC 与 SCI 之间存在行为者效应,而患者的 DC 与 SCI 之间存在伙伴效应。此外,患者和配偶照顾者的情绪健康(焦虑和抑郁)在DC和SCI之间具有中介效应:结论:配偶照顾者在患者 SCI 的评估和管理中发挥着重要作用。患者和配偶照顾者的 DC 以及患者的情绪健康(如焦虑和抑郁)是预测患者 SCI 的主要因素:对护理工作的启示:护理人员在评估和管理 SCI 时应考虑患者和配偶护理者观点的重要性。本研究支持护士关注 SCI 的一致性和相互关系,以加强 CRC 患者及其配偶护理者的 DC。这种方法旨在减少情绪困扰,并从患者双方的角度制定认知干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Congruence and Interrelationship: A Dyadic Perspective on the Subjective Cognitive Impairment in the Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Their Spousal Caregivers

Objectives

Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) reported experiencing subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), and their spousal caregivers perceived the patients’ SCI. This cross-sectional study assessed the congruence of SCI between the patients’ self-reports and the spousal caregivers’ perceptions and examined the factors affecting SCI from the dyadic perspective.

Methods

A total of 200 dyads of patients with CRC and their spousal caregivers were invited to complete the survey, which evaluated the SCI, dyadic coping (DC), quality of life, anxiety, and depression for the dyads. Congruence was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired-sample t test. Impacting factors analysis was conducted using Pearson correlations, hierarchical multiple regression, and actor–partner interdependence mediation model.

Results

The congruency of SCI between the patient-reported and the spouse-perceived ranged from moderate to good (ICC = 0.75 to 0.86). After controlling demographic variables (the patients’ gender and spouses’ work status), the DC of both patients and spousal caregivers, and the emotional health of patients were significant predictors for patients’ SCI (all P < .05). In the actor–partner interdependence mediation model, there was an actor effect between DC and SCI for both patients and spousal caregivers and a partner effect between DC and SCI for patients. Moreover, patients’ emotional health (anxiety and depression) had the mediating effect between DC and SCI for both patients and spousal caregivers.

Conclusion

Spousal caregivers played a vital role in assessment and management in the SCI of patients. The DC of patients and spousal caregivers and the emotional health of patients (eg, anxiety and depression) were major predictors for the SCI of patients.

Implications for Nursing

Nursing providers should consider the importance of patients’ and spousal caregivers’ perspectives in assessing and managing SCI. This study supports nurses focusing on the congruence and interrelationship of SCI to enhance DC for CRC patients and their spousal caregivers. This approach aims to reduce emotional distress and develop cognitive interventions from a dyadic perspective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信