初步临床评估:我们在哪里?国际范围审查。

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
J. Harcus , B. Stevens , V. Pantic , J. Hewis
{"title":"初步临床评估:我们在哪里?国际范围审查。","authors":"J. Harcus ,&nbsp;B. Stevens ,&nbsp;V. Pantic ,&nbsp;J. Hewis","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The College of Radiographers’ vision was that diagnostic radiographers in the UK would be writing preliminary clinical evaluations (PCE) on images. Their 2013 policy supporting the use of PCE has not been updated in a decade and it might be suggested PCE practices in the UK have not really moved on, though elsewhere it appears to have gained traction. The aim of this scoping review was to establish the current global status of the use of PCE.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used to develop a protocol to identify studies between January 2013 to January 2024 using six databases. Collated literature was analysed using content analysis to identify themes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>52 relevant studies were identified for inclusion. Studies focused predominantly on evaluating accuracy, education, perceptions, and new initiatives. Themes identified a developing role in the use of PCE internationally, perhaps more than in the UK, and in a range of modalities and clinical settings though projectional radiography remains the mainstay. Barriers and drivers to the use of PCE were identified in addition to some quality mechanisms used to support PCE implementation, though impact of implementation was not well explored.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Considering PCE has been an aspiration for more than a decade, it remains relatively infrequently researched. There is growing scope internationally, particularly in Australia, yet there is no real evaluation of the impact and role that PCE may have.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Until further research into the potential impact of PCE and barriers to its implementation, it is likely practices may not evolve with the risk AI technologies may supersede necessity for the practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424002050/pdfft?md5=9feb1a95cc93b892000c6c3d1946719b&pid=1-s2.0-S1078817424002050-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary clinical evaluation: Where are we? An international scoping review\",\"authors\":\"J. Harcus ,&nbsp;B. Stevens ,&nbsp;V. Pantic ,&nbsp;J. Hewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2024.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The College of Radiographers’ vision was that diagnostic radiographers in the UK would be writing preliminary clinical evaluations (PCE) on images. Their 2013 policy supporting the use of PCE has not been updated in a decade and it might be suggested PCE practices in the UK have not really moved on, though elsewhere it appears to have gained traction. The aim of this scoping review was to establish the current global status of the use of PCE.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used to develop a protocol to identify studies between January 2013 to January 2024 using six databases. Collated literature was analysed using content analysis to identify themes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>52 relevant studies were identified for inclusion. Studies focused predominantly on evaluating accuracy, education, perceptions, and new initiatives. Themes identified a developing role in the use of PCE internationally, perhaps more than in the UK, and in a range of modalities and clinical settings though projectional radiography remains the mainstay. Barriers and drivers to the use of PCE were identified in addition to some quality mechanisms used to support PCE implementation, though impact of implementation was not well explored.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Considering PCE has been an aspiration for more than a decade, it remains relatively infrequently researched. There is growing scope internationally, particularly in Australia, yet there is no real evaluation of the impact and role that PCE may have.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Until further research into the potential impact of PCE and barriers to its implementation, it is likely practices may not evolve with the risk AI technologies may supersede necessity for the practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424002050/pdfft?md5=9feb1a95cc93b892000c6c3d1946719b&pid=1-s2.0-S1078817424002050-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424002050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424002050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:放射技师学院的愿景是,英国的放射诊断技师将在图像上撰写初步临床评估(PCE)。他们在 2013 年制定的支持使用 PCE 的政策已经有十年没有更新了,可以说英国的 PCE 实践并没有真正向前迈进,尽管在其他地方似乎已经取得了一定的进展。本次范围界定审查的目的是确定 PCE 的全球使用现状:方法:采用Arksey和O'Malley范围界定审查框架和PRISMA-ScR指南制定了一项协议,利用六个数据库确定2013年1月至2024年1月期间的研究。采用内容分析法对整理后的文献进行分析,以确定主题:共确定了 52 项相关研究供纳入。研究主要侧重于评估准确性、教育、认知和新举措。研究主题表明,尽管投射放射摄影仍是主流,但在国际范围内,PCE的应用正在不断发展,其作用可能超过了英国,并应用于各种模式和临床环境中。除了用于支持 PCE 实施的一些质量机制外,还确定了使用 PCE 的障碍和驱动因素,但并未深入探讨实施的影响:考虑到 PCE 已经成为一种愿望十多年了,但对它的研究仍然相对较少。国际范围内,尤其是澳大利亚,对 PCE 的影响和作用还没有进行真正的评估:对实践的影响:在对 PCE 的潜在影响及其实施障碍进行进一步研究之前,实践可能不会随着人工智能技术取代实践必要性的风险而发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preliminary clinical evaluation: Where are we? An international scoping review

Background

The College of Radiographers’ vision was that diagnostic radiographers in the UK would be writing preliminary clinical evaluations (PCE) on images. Their 2013 policy supporting the use of PCE has not been updated in a decade and it might be suggested PCE practices in the UK have not really moved on, though elsewhere it appears to have gained traction. The aim of this scoping review was to establish the current global status of the use of PCE.

Method

The Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used to develop a protocol to identify studies between January 2013 to January 2024 using six databases. Collated literature was analysed using content analysis to identify themes.

Results

52 relevant studies were identified for inclusion. Studies focused predominantly on evaluating accuracy, education, perceptions, and new initiatives. Themes identified a developing role in the use of PCE internationally, perhaps more than in the UK, and in a range of modalities and clinical settings though projectional radiography remains the mainstay. Barriers and drivers to the use of PCE were identified in addition to some quality mechanisms used to support PCE implementation, though impact of implementation was not well explored.

Conclusion

Considering PCE has been an aspiration for more than a decade, it remains relatively infrequently researched. There is growing scope internationally, particularly in Australia, yet there is no real evaluation of the impact and role that PCE may have.

Implications for practice

Until further research into the potential impact of PCE and barriers to its implementation, it is likely practices may not evolve with the risk AI technologies may supersede necessity for the practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信