以响应式单位表示的中文 "状态 "变化符号 o

IF 1.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Hongyuan Liu , Mi Tian , Shuangyun Yao
{"title":"以响应式单位表示的中文 \"状态 \"变化符号 o","authors":"Hongyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Mi Tian ,&nbsp;Shuangyun Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adopting the methodology of Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics, this study investigates the uses of the response token <em>o</em> in Mandarin Chinese face-to-face conversation. The analysis of naturally occurring interactions shows that <em>o</em> features centrally in the practices by which speakers display a change in cognitive states, either from previously being uninformed to now being informed, or from non-understanding to understanding regarding relevant information that was just mentioned by a co-participant. It is also revealed that there is an interrelatedness between the sequential environment/turn shape of <em>o</em> and the epistemic claim that it conveys. That is, the <em>o</em> marking now-knowing typically occurs in response to informings (especially extended tellings) and it primarily plays a continuative forward-looking sequential role in freestanding form, which makes it distinct from the English <em>oh</em>. Furthermore, other turn-initial uses of <em>o</em> are routinely followed by components of repetition or assessment which are sequence-curtailing in character. Different from the <em>o</em> marking now-knowing, the <em>o</em> marking revised understanding is exclusively found in third position following the speaker’s first-position claim or question, and where that claim or question contains an incorrect assumption which has either been corrected or disconfirmed in second position.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Chinese change-of-state token o in responsive units\",\"authors\":\"Hongyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Mi Tian ,&nbsp;Shuangyun Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Adopting the methodology of Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics, this study investigates the uses of the response token <em>o</em> in Mandarin Chinese face-to-face conversation. The analysis of naturally occurring interactions shows that <em>o</em> features centrally in the practices by which speakers display a change in cognitive states, either from previously being uninformed to now being informed, or from non-understanding to understanding regarding relevant information that was just mentioned by a co-participant. It is also revealed that there is an interrelatedness between the sequential environment/turn shape of <em>o</em> and the epistemic claim that it conveys. That is, the <em>o</em> marking now-knowing typically occurs in response to informings (especially extended tellings) and it primarily plays a continuative forward-looking sequential role in freestanding form, which makes it distinct from the English <em>oh</em>. Furthermore, other turn-initial uses of <em>o</em> are routinely followed by components of repetition or assessment which are sequence-curtailing in character. Different from the <em>o</em> marking now-knowing, the <em>o</em> marking revised understanding is exclusively found in third position following the speaker’s first-position claim or question, and where that claim or question contains an incorrect assumption which has either been corrected or disconfirmed in second position.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lingua\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lingua\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384124001086\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384124001086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用会话分析和交互语言学的方法,调查了汉语普通话面对面会话中反应标记 "o "的使用情况。对自然发生的互动进行的分析表明,o 在说话人显示认知状态变化的实践中起着核心作用,这些变化要么是从以前的不知情到现在的知情,要么是从不理解到理解共同参与者刚刚提到的相关信息。研究还发现,o 的顺序环境/转折形状与它所传达的认识论主张之间存在着相互关联。也就是说,表示 "现在知道了 "的 o 通常出现在对信息(尤其是扩展的信息)的回应中,它主要以独立的形式扮演着连续性的前瞻性的顺序角色,这使它与英语中的 oh 有所区别。此外,o 的其他转折首音用法通常是在重复或评估成分之后使用的,而这些成分在性质上都是顺序性的。与表示 "现在知道了 "的 o 不同,表示 "修订后的理解 "的 o 只出现在第三位置,紧接说话人的第一位置说法或问题,并且该说法或问题包含一个不正确的假设,而该假设在第二位置已被纠正或否定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Chinese change-of-state token o in responsive units

Adopting the methodology of Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics, this study investigates the uses of the response token o in Mandarin Chinese face-to-face conversation. The analysis of naturally occurring interactions shows that o features centrally in the practices by which speakers display a change in cognitive states, either from previously being uninformed to now being informed, or from non-understanding to understanding regarding relevant information that was just mentioned by a co-participant. It is also revealed that there is an interrelatedness between the sequential environment/turn shape of o and the epistemic claim that it conveys. That is, the o marking now-knowing typically occurs in response to informings (especially extended tellings) and it primarily plays a continuative forward-looking sequential role in freestanding form, which makes it distinct from the English oh. Furthermore, other turn-initial uses of o are routinely followed by components of repetition or assessment which are sequence-curtailing in character. Different from the o marking now-knowing, the o marking revised understanding is exclusively found in third position following the speaker’s first-position claim or question, and where that claim or question contains an incorrect assumption which has either been corrected or disconfirmed in second position.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lingua
Lingua Multiple-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信