生态系统服务价值支持保护和可持续土地开发:加州大学四个校区的观点

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
K. Fausey , M.A. Rippy , G. Pierce , D. Feldman , B. Winfrey , A.S. Mehring , L.A. Levin , P.A. Holden , P.A. Bowler , R. Ambrose
{"title":"生态系统服务价值支持保护和可持续土地开发:加州大学四个校区的观点","authors":"K. Fausey ,&nbsp;M.A. Rippy ,&nbsp;G. Pierce ,&nbsp;D. Feldman ,&nbsp;B. Winfrey ,&nbsp;A.S. Mehring ,&nbsp;L.A. Levin ,&nbsp;P.A. Holden ,&nbsp;P.A. Bowler ,&nbsp;R. Ambrose","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urban landscapes homogenize our world at global scales, contributing to “extinction of experience”, a progressive decline in human interactions with native greenspace that can disconnect people from the services it provides. College age adults report feeling disconnected from nature more than other demographics, making universities a logical place to explore interventions intended to restore a connection with nature. This study surveyed 1088 students and staff across four university campus communities in Southern California, USA and used multicriteria decision analysis to explore their landscape preferences and the implications of those preferences for combatting extinction of experience. Our results suggest that perspectives of, and preferences for, different greenspace forms vary significantly (i.e., they are not perceived as substitutable). Support for native ecosystems, particularly coastal sage scrub (top ranked landscape) was generally high, suggesting that disaffection with wild nature is not particularly widespread. Programs for replacing turf grass lawns (lowest ranked landscape) with native plants were also well supported, but support for stormwater bioswales was more moderate (and variable). This may reflect their relative newness, both on university campuses and in urban spaces more generally. Not all members of campus communities preferred the same landscapes; preferences differed with degree of pro-environmentalism and university status (undergraduate student, graduate student, staff). Even so, all respondents exhibited landscape preferences consistent with at least one approach for combatting extinction of experience, suggesting that ecologists, engineers and urban planners have a viable set of generalizable tools for reconnecting people with nature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107379"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002040/pdfft?md5=c12d6b715e7a3bd9321b981deac83a59&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424002040-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem service values support conservation and sustainable land development: Perspectives from four University of California campuses\",\"authors\":\"K. Fausey ,&nbsp;M.A. Rippy ,&nbsp;G. Pierce ,&nbsp;D. Feldman ,&nbsp;B. Winfrey ,&nbsp;A.S. Mehring ,&nbsp;L.A. Levin ,&nbsp;P.A. Holden ,&nbsp;P.A. Bowler ,&nbsp;R. Ambrose\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Urban landscapes homogenize our world at global scales, contributing to “extinction of experience”, a progressive decline in human interactions with native greenspace that can disconnect people from the services it provides. College age adults report feeling disconnected from nature more than other demographics, making universities a logical place to explore interventions intended to restore a connection with nature. This study surveyed 1088 students and staff across four university campus communities in Southern California, USA and used multicriteria decision analysis to explore their landscape preferences and the implications of those preferences for combatting extinction of experience. Our results suggest that perspectives of, and preferences for, different greenspace forms vary significantly (i.e., they are not perceived as substitutable). Support for native ecosystems, particularly coastal sage scrub (top ranked landscape) was generally high, suggesting that disaffection with wild nature is not particularly widespread. Programs for replacing turf grass lawns (lowest ranked landscape) with native plants were also well supported, but support for stormwater bioswales was more moderate (and variable). This may reflect their relative newness, both on university campuses and in urban spaces more generally. Not all members of campus communities preferred the same landscapes; preferences differed with degree of pro-environmentalism and university status (undergraduate student, graduate student, staff). Even so, all respondents exhibited landscape preferences consistent with at least one approach for combatting extinction of experience, suggesting that ecologists, engineers and urban planners have a viable set of generalizable tools for reconnecting people with nature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002040/pdfft?md5=c12d6b715e7a3bd9321b981deac83a59&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424002040-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市景观在全球范围内使我们的世界同质化,导致 "体验灭绝",人类与本土绿地的互动逐渐减少,从而使人们与绿地提供的服务脱节。大学年龄段的成年人比其他人群更容易感到与自然脱节,因此大学是探索旨在恢复与自然联系的干预措施的合理场所。本研究对美国南加州四个大学校园社区的 1088 名学生和教职员工进行了调查,并使用多标准决策分析来探讨他们对景观的偏好以及这些偏好对消除体验的影响。我们的研究结果表明,人们对不同绿地形式的看法和偏好存在很大差异(即认为它们不可替代)。对本地生态系统,尤其是沿海鼠尾草灌丛(排名第一的景观)的支持率普遍较高,这表明对野生自然的不满并不特别普遍。用本地植物取代草皮草坪(排名最低的景观)的计划也得到了很好的支持,但对雨水生物沟渠的支持则较为温和(且不稳定)。这可能反映出,无论是在大学校园还是在更广泛的城市空间中,生物渠都是相对较新的项目。并不是所有的校园社区成员都喜欢相同的景观;他们的喜好因环保程度和大学身份(本科生、研究生、教职员工)而异。即便如此,所有受访者表现出的景观偏好至少与一种对抗体验消失的方法相一致,这表明生态学家、工程师和城市规划者拥有一套可行的通用工具来重新建立人与自然的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ecosystem service values support conservation and sustainable land development: Perspectives from four University of California campuses

Ecosystem service values support conservation and sustainable land development: Perspectives from four University of California campuses

Urban landscapes homogenize our world at global scales, contributing to “extinction of experience”, a progressive decline in human interactions with native greenspace that can disconnect people from the services it provides. College age adults report feeling disconnected from nature more than other demographics, making universities a logical place to explore interventions intended to restore a connection with nature. This study surveyed 1088 students and staff across four university campus communities in Southern California, USA and used multicriteria decision analysis to explore their landscape preferences and the implications of those preferences for combatting extinction of experience. Our results suggest that perspectives of, and preferences for, different greenspace forms vary significantly (i.e., they are not perceived as substitutable). Support for native ecosystems, particularly coastal sage scrub (top ranked landscape) was generally high, suggesting that disaffection with wild nature is not particularly widespread. Programs for replacing turf grass lawns (lowest ranked landscape) with native plants were also well supported, but support for stormwater bioswales was more moderate (and variable). This may reflect their relative newness, both on university campuses and in urban spaces more generally. Not all members of campus communities preferred the same landscapes; preferences differed with degree of pro-environmentalism and university status (undergraduate student, graduate student, staff). Even so, all respondents exhibited landscape preferences consistent with at least one approach for combatting extinction of experience, suggesting that ecologists, engineers and urban planners have a viable set of generalizable tools for reconnecting people with nature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信