Seth N Zupanc, Lisa M Quintiliani, Amy M LeClair, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, Angelo Volandes, Akhila Penumarthy, Lori Henault, Jennifer E Itty, Aretha D Davis, Joshua R Lakin
{"title":"播种者：对姑息关怀教育者在促进关怀目标对话和姑息关怀转诊中的作用的定性分析。","authors":"Seth N Zupanc, Lisa M Quintiliani, Amy M LeClair, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, Angelo Volandes, Akhila Penumarthy, Lori Henault, Jennifer E Itty, Aretha D Davis, Joshua R Lakin","doi":"10.1177/10499091241267917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal care for seriously ill and older patients often involves advance care planning (ACP), goals-of-care (GOC) conversations, and specialty palliative care consultation, three sometimes overlapping, yet distinct practices. Insufficient staffing and investment in these areas have limited their availability.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We explored the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of the VIDEO-PCE trial. The intervention aimed to increase patient engagement in ACP, GOC, and by establishing Palliative Care Educators, a new clinical role integrated into existing hospital wards.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This qualitative interview study employed a semi-structured interview guide tailored to the interviewee's clinical role. The interviews elicited perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to integration of palliative care educators (PCEs) into existing workflows. We developed deductive codes a priori and inductive codes as we coded interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Setting/subjects: </strong>Medical/surgical floor clinical colleagues, palliative care team members, and PCEs from both participating sites were interviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four individuals were interviewed (12 clinical staff of medical and surgical wards, seven palliative care team members, and five PCEs). Four themes were identified: (1) The work completed by the PCEs provided a foundation for future palliative care involvement; (2) Constituting the new role in practice required revision and creativity; (3) Communication was important to providing continuity of care; and (4) Establishing trust catalyzed the acceptance of the role.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The creation and implementation of a new role within existing clinical workflows posed some challenges but were felt to relieve staff from some work burden and allow more patients to engage in ACP and GOC conversations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04857060.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Sowers of Seeds: A Qualitative Analysis of the Role of Palliative Care Educators in Facilitating Goals-of-Care Conversations and Palliative Care Referrals.\",\"authors\":\"Seth N Zupanc, Lisa M Quintiliani, Amy M LeClair, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, Angelo Volandes, Akhila Penumarthy, Lori Henault, Jennifer E Itty, Aretha D Davis, Joshua R Lakin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10499091241267917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal care for seriously ill and older patients often involves advance care planning (ACP), goals-of-care (GOC) conversations, and specialty palliative care consultation, three sometimes overlapping, yet distinct practices. Insufficient staffing and investment in these areas have limited their availability.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We explored the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of the VIDEO-PCE trial. The intervention aimed to increase patient engagement in ACP, GOC, and by establishing Palliative Care Educators, a new clinical role integrated into existing hospital wards.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This qualitative interview study employed a semi-structured interview guide tailored to the interviewee's clinical role. The interviews elicited perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to integration of palliative care educators (PCEs) into existing workflows. We developed deductive codes a priori and inductive codes as we coded interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Setting/subjects: </strong>Medical/surgical floor clinical colleagues, palliative care team members, and PCEs from both participating sites were interviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four individuals were interviewed (12 clinical staff of medical and surgical wards, seven palliative care team members, and five PCEs). Four themes were identified: (1) The work completed by the PCEs provided a foundation for future palliative care involvement; (2) Constituting the new role in practice required revision and creativity; (3) Communication was important to providing continuity of care; and (4) Establishing trust catalyzed the acceptance of the role.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The creation and implementation of a new role within existing clinical workflows posed some challenges but were felt to relieve staff from some work burden and allow more patients to engage in ACP and GOC conversations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04857060.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241267917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241267917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Sowers of Seeds: A Qualitative Analysis of the Role of Palliative Care Educators in Facilitating Goals-of-Care Conversations and Palliative Care Referrals.
Background: Optimal care for seriously ill and older patients often involves advance care planning (ACP), goals-of-care (GOC) conversations, and specialty palliative care consultation, three sometimes overlapping, yet distinct practices. Insufficient staffing and investment in these areas have limited their availability.
Objectives: We explored the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of the VIDEO-PCE trial. The intervention aimed to increase patient engagement in ACP, GOC, and by establishing Palliative Care Educators, a new clinical role integrated into existing hospital wards.
Design: This qualitative interview study employed a semi-structured interview guide tailored to the interviewee's clinical role. The interviews elicited perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to integration of palliative care educators (PCEs) into existing workflows. We developed deductive codes a priori and inductive codes as we coded interview transcripts.
Setting/subjects: Medical/surgical floor clinical colleagues, palliative care team members, and PCEs from both participating sites were interviewed.
Results: Twenty-four individuals were interviewed (12 clinical staff of medical and surgical wards, seven palliative care team members, and five PCEs). Four themes were identified: (1) The work completed by the PCEs provided a foundation for future palliative care involvement; (2) Constituting the new role in practice required revision and creativity; (3) Communication was important to providing continuity of care; and (4) Establishing trust catalyzed the acceptance of the role.
Conclusion: The creation and implementation of a new role within existing clinical workflows posed some challenges but were felt to relieve staff from some work burden and allow more patients to engage in ACP and GOC conversations.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
