二十年来,挪威中部山顶植物区系的功能和系统发育丰富性不断提高

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Thomas Vanneste, Bente J. Graae, Magni O. Kyrkjeeide, Sigrid Lindmo, Ottar Michelsen, Domenica J. Naranjo-Orrico, Courtenay A. Ray, Matthias Vandersteene, Kris Verheyen, Pieter De Frenne
{"title":"二十年来,挪威中部山顶植物区系的功能和系统发育丰富性不断提高","authors":"Thomas Vanneste,&nbsp;Bente J. Graae,&nbsp;Magni O. Kyrkjeeide,&nbsp;Sigrid Lindmo,&nbsp;Ottar Michelsen,&nbsp;Domenica J. Naranjo-Orrico,&nbsp;Courtenay A. Ray,&nbsp;Matthias Vandersteene,&nbsp;Kris Verheyen,&nbsp;Pieter De Frenne","doi":"10.1111/jvs.13299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Questions</h3>\n \n <p>Analysing how multiple facets of biodiversity vary across space and time can help to predict the vulnerability of mountaintop floras to future environmental changes. Here we addressed the following questions: (a) Are elevational patterns of mountaintop plant diversity consistent across taxonomy, function and phylogeny? (b) How have the taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic dimensions of mountaintop plant communities changed over the past two decades? (c) Is the magnitude of these temporal trends dependent on elevation?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Dovrefjell, central Norway.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The floristic composition of four mountaintops, spread across an elevational gradient from the tree line to the uppermost margins of vascular plant life, was surveyed every 7 years between 2001 and 2022. Six metrics of taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic richness and differentiation were calculated for each mountaintop and survey. Using these data, we assessed how richness and differentiation metrics varied over space (across the elevational gradient) and over time (between surveys).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All diversity metrics decreased towards higher elevations, except phylogenetic differentiation which increased significantly by 7% per 100 m elevational gain. Taxonomic richness remained virtually stable between 2001 and 2022, whereas phylogenetic richness increased by 7.5% per decade. Functional richness also increased, but mainly on the lowest mountaintop, by 17% per decade. No significant temporal trends in taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic differentiation were detected.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings underpin rearrangements in the functional and phylogenetic structure of mountain plant communities over the past two decades that cannot be predicted from trends in taxonomic richness alone. This highlights the necessity to look beyond species richness and consider multiple facets of biodiversity when studying environmental change impacts on mountain biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetation Science","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two decades of increasing functional and phylogenetic richness in a mountaintop flora in central Norway\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Vanneste,&nbsp;Bente J. Graae,&nbsp;Magni O. Kyrkjeeide,&nbsp;Sigrid Lindmo,&nbsp;Ottar Michelsen,&nbsp;Domenica J. Naranjo-Orrico,&nbsp;Courtenay A. Ray,&nbsp;Matthias Vandersteene,&nbsp;Kris Verheyen,&nbsp;Pieter De Frenne\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jvs.13299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Questions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Analysing how multiple facets of biodiversity vary across space and time can help to predict the vulnerability of mountaintop floras to future environmental changes. Here we addressed the following questions: (a) Are elevational patterns of mountaintop plant diversity consistent across taxonomy, function and phylogeny? (b) How have the taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic dimensions of mountaintop plant communities changed over the past two decades? (c) Is the magnitude of these temporal trends dependent on elevation?</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dovrefjell, central Norway.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The floristic composition of four mountaintops, spread across an elevational gradient from the tree line to the uppermost margins of vascular plant life, was surveyed every 7 years between 2001 and 2022. Six metrics of taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic richness and differentiation were calculated for each mountaintop and survey. Using these data, we assessed how richness and differentiation metrics varied over space (across the elevational gradient) and over time (between surveys).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All diversity metrics decreased towards higher elevations, except phylogenetic differentiation which increased significantly by 7% per 100 m elevational gain. Taxonomic richness remained virtually stable between 2001 and 2022, whereas phylogenetic richness increased by 7.5% per decade. Functional richness also increased, but mainly on the lowest mountaintop, by 17% per decade. No significant temporal trends in taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic differentiation were detected.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings underpin rearrangements in the functional and phylogenetic structure of mountain plant communities over the past two decades that cannot be predicted from trends in taxonomic richness alone. This highlights the necessity to look beyond species richness and consider multiple facets of biodiversity when studying environmental change impacts on mountain biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vegetation Science\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vegetation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.13299\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.13299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题 分析生物多样性的多个方面在不同时空的变化情况有助于预测山顶植物面对未来环境变化的脆弱性。在此,我们探讨了以下问题:(a) 山顶植物多样性的海拔模式在分类、功能和系统发育方面是否一致?(b) 在过去二十年中,山顶植物群落的分类、功能和系统发育方面发生了哪些变化?(c) 这些时间趋势的程度是否取决于海拔高度? 地点:挪威中部多夫雷菲尔。 方法 在 2001 年至 2022 年期间,每隔 7 年对四座山顶的植物组成进行调查,这些山顶分布在从林木线到维管植物生命最边缘的海拔梯度上。我们为每个山顶和每次调查计算了分类、功能和系统发育丰富度和分化的六个指标。利用这些数据,我们评估了丰富度和分化度指标随空间(跨海拔梯度)和时间(两次调查之间)的变化情况。 结果 所有的多样性指标都随着海拔的升高而降低,只有系统发育分化指标每升高 100 米会显著增加 7%。分类丰富度在 2001 年至 2022 年期间基本保持稳定,而系统发育丰富度每十年增加 7.5%。功能丰富度也有所增加,但主要是在最低的山顶,每十年增加 17%。在分类、功能和系统发育分化方面没有发现明显的时间趋势。 结论 我们的研究结果表明,在过去二十年中,山区植物群落的功能和系统发育结构发生了变化,而这些变化是无法仅从分类丰富度的变化趋势中预测出来的。这突出表明,在研究环境变化对山区生物多样性和生态系统功能的影响时,有必要超越物种丰富度,考虑生物多样性的多个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Two decades of increasing functional and phylogenetic richness in a mountaintop flora in central Norway

Two decades of increasing functional and phylogenetic richness in a mountaintop flora in central Norway

Questions

Analysing how multiple facets of biodiversity vary across space and time can help to predict the vulnerability of mountaintop floras to future environmental changes. Here we addressed the following questions: (a) Are elevational patterns of mountaintop plant diversity consistent across taxonomy, function and phylogeny? (b) How have the taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic dimensions of mountaintop plant communities changed over the past two decades? (c) Is the magnitude of these temporal trends dependent on elevation?

Location

Dovrefjell, central Norway.

Methods

The floristic composition of four mountaintops, spread across an elevational gradient from the tree line to the uppermost margins of vascular plant life, was surveyed every 7 years between 2001 and 2022. Six metrics of taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic richness and differentiation were calculated for each mountaintop and survey. Using these data, we assessed how richness and differentiation metrics varied over space (across the elevational gradient) and over time (between surveys).

Results

All diversity metrics decreased towards higher elevations, except phylogenetic differentiation which increased significantly by 7% per 100 m elevational gain. Taxonomic richness remained virtually stable between 2001 and 2022, whereas phylogenetic richness increased by 7.5% per decade. Functional richness also increased, but mainly on the lowest mountaintop, by 17% per decade. No significant temporal trends in taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic differentiation were detected.

Conclusions

Our findings underpin rearrangements in the functional and phylogenetic structure of mountain plant communities over the past two decades that cannot be predicted from trends in taxonomic richness alone. This highlights the necessity to look beyond species richness and consider multiple facets of biodiversity when studying environmental change impacts on mountain biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vegetation Science
Journal of Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
60
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vegetation Science publishes papers on all aspects of plant community ecology, with particular emphasis on papers that develop new concepts or methods, test theory, identify general patterns, or that are otherwise likely to interest a broad international readership. Papers may focus on any aspect of vegetation science, e.g. community structure (including community assembly and plant functional types), biodiversity (including species richness and composition), spatial patterns (including plant geography and landscape ecology), temporal changes (including demography, community dynamics and palaeoecology) and processes (including ecophysiology), provided the focus is on increasing our understanding of plant communities. The Journal publishes papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities. Papers that apply ecological concepts, theories and methods to the vegetation management, conservation and restoration, and papers on vegetation survey should be directed to our associate journal, Applied Vegetation Science journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信