游戏障碍测试(GDT)的可靠性归纳元分析和心理测量学回顾:评估内部一致性

Q1 Psychology
Haitham Jahrami , Waqar Husain , Chung-Ying Lin , Gunilla Björling , Marc N Potenza , Amir Pakpour
{"title":"游戏障碍测试(GDT)的可靠性归纳元分析和心理测量学回顾:评估内部一致性","authors":"Haitham Jahrami ,&nbsp;Waqar Husain ,&nbsp;Chung-Ying Lin ,&nbsp;Gunilla Björling ,&nbsp;Marc N Potenza ,&nbsp;Amir Pakpour","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2024.100563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gaming disorder (GD) is a growing public health issue requiring reliable screening and diagnostic tools. A commonly used tool for assessing GD is the Gaming Disorder Test (GDT). The GDT assesses GD based on International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) criteria; however, its psychometric testing has been conducted across studies but yet snythesized. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize psychometric data regarding the GDT globally. Adhering to pre-registration, a comprehensive search across databases identified 17 eligible studies (n=22,000) in 14 languages reporting on the psychometric properties of the GDT, especially its Cronbach’s alpha. The pooled Cronbach’s alpha was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89), indicating excellent internal consistency. Although significant heterogeneity was observed (I<sup>2</sup>= 98.54%), prediction intervals suggested true outcomes likely shared a positive direction. No moderating effects were found regarding sample characteristics, study quality, or geographical location. The meta-analysis provides robust and quantitative evidence supporting the internal consistency of the GDT across diverse populations. Moreover, qualitative synthesis indicates that the GDT has strong psychometric properties without risk of bias across the analyzed studies, indicating the GDT’s ability to assess GD globally. However, the heterogeneity suggests cautious interpretation of the reliability estimates</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853224000403/pdfft?md5=34fb75246303def20466bedc11e50dfc&pid=1-s2.0-S2352853224000403-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability generalization Meta-Analysis and psychometric review of the Gaming Disorder test (GDT): Evaluating internal consistency\",\"authors\":\"Haitham Jahrami ,&nbsp;Waqar Husain ,&nbsp;Chung-Ying Lin ,&nbsp;Gunilla Björling ,&nbsp;Marc N Potenza ,&nbsp;Amir Pakpour\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.abrep.2024.100563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Gaming disorder (GD) is a growing public health issue requiring reliable screening and diagnostic tools. A commonly used tool for assessing GD is the Gaming Disorder Test (GDT). The GDT assesses GD based on International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) criteria; however, its psychometric testing has been conducted across studies but yet snythesized. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize psychometric data regarding the GDT globally. Adhering to pre-registration, a comprehensive search across databases identified 17 eligible studies (n=22,000) in 14 languages reporting on the psychometric properties of the GDT, especially its Cronbach’s alpha. The pooled Cronbach’s alpha was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89), indicating excellent internal consistency. Although significant heterogeneity was observed (I<sup>2</sup>= 98.54%), prediction intervals suggested true outcomes likely shared a positive direction. No moderating effects were found regarding sample characteristics, study quality, or geographical location. The meta-analysis provides robust and quantitative evidence supporting the internal consistency of the GDT across diverse populations. Moreover, qualitative synthesis indicates that the GDT has strong psychometric properties without risk of bias across the analyzed studies, indicating the GDT’s ability to assess GD globally. However, the heterogeneity suggests cautious interpretation of the reliability estimates</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addictive Behaviors Reports\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853224000403/pdfft?md5=34fb75246303def20466bedc11e50dfc&pid=1-s2.0-S2352853224000403-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addictive Behaviors Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853224000403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853224000403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

游戏障碍(GD)是一个日益严重的公共健康问题,需要可靠的筛查和诊断工具。游戏障碍测试(GDT)是评估游戏障碍的常用工具。GDT 是根据《国际疾病分类》第 11 次修订版(ICD-11)的标准来评估 GD 的;然而,已有多项研究对 GDT 进行了心理测试,但尚未进行荟萃分析。本荟萃分析旨在综合全球有关 GDT 的心理测量数据。根据预先登记的要求,我们在数据库中进行了全面搜索,发现了 17 项符合条件的研究(n=22,000),涉及 14 种语言,报告了 GDT 的心理测量特性,尤其是其 Cronbach's alpha。汇总的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.86(95% CI:0.83-0.89),表明其内部一致性极佳。虽然观察到了明显的异质性(I2= 98.54%),但预测区间表明真实结果可能共享一个积极的方向。在样本特征、研究质量或地理位置方面没有发现调节效应。荟萃分析提供了可靠的定量证据,支持 GDT 在不同人群中的内部一致性。此外,定性综合分析表明,GDT 具有很强的心理测量特性,在所分析的研究中没有偏差风险,这表明 GDT 能够全面评估广东。然而,由于存在异质性,对可靠性估计值的解释需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability generalization Meta-Analysis and psychometric review of the Gaming Disorder test (GDT): Evaluating internal consistency

Gaming disorder (GD) is a growing public health issue requiring reliable screening and diagnostic tools. A commonly used tool for assessing GD is the Gaming Disorder Test (GDT). The GDT assesses GD based on International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) criteria; however, its psychometric testing has been conducted across studies but yet snythesized. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize psychometric data regarding the GDT globally. Adhering to pre-registration, a comprehensive search across databases identified 17 eligible studies (n=22,000) in 14 languages reporting on the psychometric properties of the GDT, especially its Cronbach’s alpha. The pooled Cronbach’s alpha was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89), indicating excellent internal consistency. Although significant heterogeneity was observed (I2= 98.54%), prediction intervals suggested true outcomes likely shared a positive direction. No moderating effects were found regarding sample characteristics, study quality, or geographical location. The meta-analysis provides robust and quantitative evidence supporting the internal consistency of the GDT across diverse populations. Moreover, qualitative synthesis indicates that the GDT has strong psychometric properties without risk of bias across the analyzed studies, indicating the GDT’s ability to assess GD globally. However, the heterogeneity suggests cautious interpretation of the reliability estimates

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信