关于水和卫生设施私有化的讨论:对联合国报告撰稿的批判性话语分析

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Priscila Neves-Silva , Maria Carmen Aires Gomes , Léo Heller
{"title":"关于水和卫生设施私有化的讨论:对联合国报告撰稿的批判性话语分析","authors":"Priscila Neves-Silva ,&nbsp;Maria Carmen Aires Gomes ,&nbsp;Léo Heller","doi":"10.1016/j.wasec.2024.100179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Privatization of water and sanitation services was strongly boosted in the 1980s. In 2020, a UN report was published pointing out that privatizing of water and sanitation services can pose risks to the guarantee of access to the human rights to water and sanitation (HRtWS). When preparing the report, a public consultation was held to receive contributions, through a standardized questionnaire, from governments, service providers, and civil society. This article aims to analyze the discourse positioning of the agents on the privatization of these services and their relationship with the guarantee of access to the HRtWS. Based on the critical-discursive approach, responses to 99 questionnaires – 18 from government, 20 from civil society and 61 from private providers – were assessed. Of those, 12 out of the 18 states that answered the questionnaire aligned themselves with the discourse of private providers, emphasizing that privatization can promote higher quality and more efficient service. Additionally, private entities point out that public agents cannot mobilize external resources and manage them efficiently. However, civil society draw attention to the fact that private providers do not put their own resources into improving infrastructure and that when they do it, they seek a quick return on investment through tariffs resulting in increased tariffs and, consequently, disconnection of people in vulnerable situations. For these actors, service privatization would be a risk to the guarantee of the HRtWS. The analysis revealed substantial discrepancies in the views of actors on the subject, pointing out to discourse disputes regarding the role of the State in the debate about water and sanitation provision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37308,"journal":{"name":"Water Security","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Talks about privatization of water and sanitation: A critical discourse analysis of contributions to a UN report\",\"authors\":\"Priscila Neves-Silva ,&nbsp;Maria Carmen Aires Gomes ,&nbsp;Léo Heller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wasec.2024.100179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Privatization of water and sanitation services was strongly boosted in the 1980s. In 2020, a UN report was published pointing out that privatizing of water and sanitation services can pose risks to the guarantee of access to the human rights to water and sanitation (HRtWS). When preparing the report, a public consultation was held to receive contributions, through a standardized questionnaire, from governments, service providers, and civil society. This article aims to analyze the discourse positioning of the agents on the privatization of these services and their relationship with the guarantee of access to the HRtWS. Based on the critical-discursive approach, responses to 99 questionnaires – 18 from government, 20 from civil society and 61 from private providers – were assessed. Of those, 12 out of the 18 states that answered the questionnaire aligned themselves with the discourse of private providers, emphasizing that privatization can promote higher quality and more efficient service. Additionally, private entities point out that public agents cannot mobilize external resources and manage them efficiently. However, civil society draw attention to the fact that private providers do not put their own resources into improving infrastructure and that when they do it, they seek a quick return on investment through tariffs resulting in increased tariffs and, consequently, disconnection of people in vulnerable situations. For these actors, service privatization would be a risk to the guarantee of the HRtWS. The analysis revealed substantial discrepancies in the views of actors on the subject, pointing out to discourse disputes regarding the role of the State in the debate about water and sanitation provision.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Security\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468312424000154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468312424000154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20 世纪 80 年代,供水和卫生设施服务私有化得到了大力推动。2020 年,联合国发布了一份报告,指出供水和卫生设施服务私有化可能对保障享有水和卫生设施的人权(HRtWS)构成风险。在编写该报告时,曾举行过一次公众咨询,通过一份标准问卷,听取了来自政府、服务提供商和民间社会的意见。本文旨在分析这些机构在这些服务私有化问题上的话语定位及其与保障享有人权与卫生设施(HRtWS)之间的关系。根据批判-辨证的方法,对 99 份调查问卷的答复进行了评估,其中 18 份来自政府,20 份来自民间社会,61 份来自私营供应商。其中,在 18 个回答问卷的国家中,有 12 个国家赞同私营提供商的论述,强调私有化可以提高服务质量和效率。此外,私营实体还指出,公共机构无法调动外部资源并对其进行有效管理。然而,民间社会提请注意,私营提供商不会将自己的资源用于改善基础设施,当他们这样做时,他们会通过收费寻求快速的投资回报,从而导致收费增加,并因此导致弱势群体断网。对这些行为者而言,服务私有化将对保证 HRtWS 构成风险。分析表明,各行动者在这一问题上的观点存在很大差异,这表明在有关供水和卫生设施 的辩论中,对国家的作用存在争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Talks about privatization of water and sanitation: A critical discourse analysis of contributions to a UN report

Privatization of water and sanitation services was strongly boosted in the 1980s. In 2020, a UN report was published pointing out that privatizing of water and sanitation services can pose risks to the guarantee of access to the human rights to water and sanitation (HRtWS). When preparing the report, a public consultation was held to receive contributions, through a standardized questionnaire, from governments, service providers, and civil society. This article aims to analyze the discourse positioning of the agents on the privatization of these services and their relationship with the guarantee of access to the HRtWS. Based on the critical-discursive approach, responses to 99 questionnaires – 18 from government, 20 from civil society and 61 from private providers – were assessed. Of those, 12 out of the 18 states that answered the questionnaire aligned themselves with the discourse of private providers, emphasizing that privatization can promote higher quality and more efficient service. Additionally, private entities point out that public agents cannot mobilize external resources and manage them efficiently. However, civil society draw attention to the fact that private providers do not put their own resources into improving infrastructure and that when they do it, they seek a quick return on investment through tariffs resulting in increased tariffs and, consequently, disconnection of people in vulnerable situations. For these actors, service privatization would be a risk to the guarantee of the HRtWS. The analysis revealed substantial discrepancies in the views of actors on the subject, pointing out to discourse disputes regarding the role of the State in the debate about water and sanitation provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Security
Water Security Earth and Planetary Sciences-Oceanography
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Water Security aims to publish papers that contribute to a better understanding of the economic, social, biophysical, technological, and institutional influencers of current and future global water security. At the same time the journal intends to stimulate debate, backed by science, with strong interdisciplinary connections. The goal is to publish concise and timely reviews and synthesis articles about research covering the following elements of water security: -Shortage- Flooding- Governance- Health and Sanitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信