副作用预期与 COVID 后神经系统住院康复 3 个月后的残疾、体能和躯体症状有关

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"副作用预期与 COVID 后神经系统住院康复 3 个月后的残疾、体能和躯体症状有关","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to long-term health issues known as post-COVID-19 condition, including fatigue and cognitive disruptions. Despite its recognition as a public health concern, the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, especially in neurological rehabilitation, remains unclear. This study examines how treatment expectations are associated with psychological and physical outcomes in post-COVID-19 condition neurological rehabilitation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In an observational cohort study 61 patients with confirmed post-COVID-19 condition were included. Baseline (T0) data on treatment and side effect expectations were collected, before participants underwent a 4–6 week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Primary outcome was illness-related disability (Pain Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), anxiety levels (GAD-7), functional status (PCFS), fatigue (CFS), and physical fitness (6MWT). Regression models analyzed the associations of baseline expectations with outcomes at the end of rehabilitation (T1) and three months post-rehabilitation (T2).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After adjusting for multiple testing, higher baseline side-effect expectations were associated with greater illness-related disability (β = 0.42, <em>p</em> = 0.007), reduced physical fitness (β = − 0.24, <em>p</em> = 0.04), and more somatic symptoms (β = 0.33, <em>p</em> = 0.006) at follow-up (T2). Positive treatment expectations were associated with poorer functional status (β = 0.35, <em>p</em> = 0.011) at T2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study highlights the associations of side-effect expectations with post-COVID-19 condition rehabilitation outcomes. Higher side-effect expectations were associated to poorer outcomes, indicating a nocebo effect. Surprisingly, positive expectations were linked to worse outcomes, possibly due to unrealistic optimism. Managing patient expectations realistically and addressing side-effect concerns seems crucial for optimizing rehabilitation outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003143/pdfft?md5=83501aa2369d753b012a83d20c9d61eb&pid=1-s2.0-S0022399924003143-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Side-effect expectations are associated with disability, physical fitness, and somatic symptoms 3 months after post-COVID neurological inpatient rehabilitation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to long-term health issues known as post-COVID-19 condition, including fatigue and cognitive disruptions. Despite its recognition as a public health concern, the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, especially in neurological rehabilitation, remains unclear. This study examines how treatment expectations are associated with psychological and physical outcomes in post-COVID-19 condition neurological rehabilitation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In an observational cohort study 61 patients with confirmed post-COVID-19 condition were included. Baseline (T0) data on treatment and side effect expectations were collected, before participants underwent a 4–6 week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Primary outcome was illness-related disability (Pain Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), anxiety levels (GAD-7), functional status (PCFS), fatigue (CFS), and physical fitness (6MWT). Regression models analyzed the associations of baseline expectations with outcomes at the end of rehabilitation (T1) and three months post-rehabilitation (T2).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After adjusting for multiple testing, higher baseline side-effect expectations were associated with greater illness-related disability (β = 0.42, <em>p</em> = 0.007), reduced physical fitness (β = − 0.24, <em>p</em> = 0.04), and more somatic symptoms (β = 0.33, <em>p</em> = 0.006) at follow-up (T2). Positive treatment expectations were associated with poorer functional status (β = 0.35, <em>p</em> = 0.011) at T2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study highlights the associations of side-effect expectations with post-COVID-19 condition rehabilitation outcomes. Higher side-effect expectations were associated to poorer outcomes, indicating a nocebo effect. Surprisingly, positive expectations were linked to worse outcomes, possibly due to unrealistic optimism. Managing patient expectations realistically and addressing side-effect concerns seems crucial for optimizing rehabilitation outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003143/pdfft?md5=83501aa2369d753b012a83d20c9d61eb&pid=1-s2.0-S0022399924003143-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003143\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由 SARS-CoV-2 引起的 COVID-19 大流行导致了被称为 COVID-19 后遗症的长期健康问题,包括疲劳和认知障碍。尽管人们已认识到这是一个公共卫生问题,但治疗干预措施的效果,尤其是在神经康复方面的效果仍不明确。本研究探讨了治疗期望与 COVID-19 后遗症神经康复中的心理和生理结果之间的关系。方法在一项观察性队列研究中,纳入了 61 名确诊为 COVID-19 后遗症的患者。在参与者接受为期 4-6 周的多学科康复计划之前,收集了有关治疗和副作用预期的基线(T0)数据。主要结果是与疾病相关的残疾(疼痛残疾指数)。次要结果包括抑郁症状(PHQ-9)、焦虑水平(GAD-7)、功能状态(PCFS)、疲劳(CFS)和体能(6MWT)。回归模型分析了基线期望与康复结束时(T1)和康复后三个月(T2)的结果之间的关系。结果经多重测试调整后,基线副作用期望越高,随访(T2)时与疾病相关的残疾程度越高(β = 0.42,p = 0.007),体能下降(β = - 0.24,p = 0.04),躯体症状越多(β = 0.33,p = 0.006)。积极的治疗期望与 T2 阶段较差的功能状态相关(β = 0.35,p = 0.011)。较高的副作用预期与较差的康复效果相关,这表明存在着一种 "安慰剂效应"。令人惊讶的是,积极的预期与较差的疗效相关,这可能是由于不切实际的乐观所致。实事求是地管理患者的期望值并解决副作用问题似乎对优化康复效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Side-effect expectations are associated with disability, physical fitness, and somatic symptoms 3 months after post-COVID neurological inpatient rehabilitation

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to long-term health issues known as post-COVID-19 condition, including fatigue and cognitive disruptions. Despite its recognition as a public health concern, the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, especially in neurological rehabilitation, remains unclear. This study examines how treatment expectations are associated with psychological and physical outcomes in post-COVID-19 condition neurological rehabilitation.

Methods

In an observational cohort study 61 patients with confirmed post-COVID-19 condition were included. Baseline (T0) data on treatment and side effect expectations were collected, before participants underwent a 4–6 week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Primary outcome was illness-related disability (Pain Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), anxiety levels (GAD-7), functional status (PCFS), fatigue (CFS), and physical fitness (6MWT). Regression models analyzed the associations of baseline expectations with outcomes at the end of rehabilitation (T1) and three months post-rehabilitation (T2).

Results

After adjusting for multiple testing, higher baseline side-effect expectations were associated with greater illness-related disability (β = 0.42, p = 0.007), reduced physical fitness (β = − 0.24, p = 0.04), and more somatic symptoms (β = 0.33, p = 0.006) at follow-up (T2). Positive treatment expectations were associated with poorer functional status (β = 0.35, p = 0.011) at T2.

Conclusion

This study highlights the associations of side-effect expectations with post-COVID-19 condition rehabilitation outcomes. Higher side-effect expectations were associated to poorer outcomes, indicating a nocebo effect. Surprisingly, positive expectations were linked to worse outcomes, possibly due to unrealistic optimism. Managing patient expectations realistically and addressing side-effect concerns seems crucial for optimizing rehabilitation outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信