蚯蚓和根系特性能提高植物对结构磷的吸收吗?田间中观生态研究

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Laura M.E. Ferron , Jan Willem Van Groenigen , Gerwin F. Koopmans , Alix Vidal
{"title":"蚯蚓和根系特性能提高植物对结构磷的吸收吗?田间中观生态研究","authors":"Laura M.E. Ferron ,&nbsp;Jan Willem Van Groenigen ,&nbsp;Gerwin F. Koopmans ,&nbsp;Alix Vidal","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The availability of conventional linear mineral phosphorus (P) fertilization will become lower as phosphate rock stocks are limited and strongly concentrated in a few locations. Therefore, we need to increase agronomic P use efficiency and find alternative, recycled, sources of P. Two possible solutions mentioned in the literature are (i) using struvite, a mineral circular P fertilizer; and (ii) making use of earthworm activity, which has been shown to increase P availability. Here, we study the interaction between these two approaches, with the hypothesis that earthworms could increase the P availability from the poorly soluble struvite. We set up a field-based mesocosm experiment in a sandy soil with a low agronomic P status with 13 different treatments combining three earthworms species (<em>Lumbricus rubellus</em> Hoffmeister, <em>Aporrectodea caliginosa</em> Savigny and <em>A. longa</em> Ude alone or in a threes species mixture), different P fertilizers (no P, Triple Super Phosphate (TSP) and struvite). The experiment lasted 13 months (five fertilisation-harvest cycles). We found that, in field conditions, the yield and P uptake of <em>Lolium perenne</em> did not differ between fertilization with struvite or TSP. Earthworms only played a minor role in explaining ryegrass P uptake compared to fertilisation. We did not see either positive nor negative interactions between earthworms and struvite, meaning that earthworms did not further increase the P availability from struvite. The equal performances of struvite and TSP are explained by an enhanced effort from plants to actively take up P through a modification of root traits. This includes increased arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonisation and the production of finer and longer roots. Our results show that struvite performs comparably to TSP under realistic field conditions, making it a viable alternative to phosphate rock-based fertilizers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"377 ","pages":"Article 109255"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924003736/pdfft?md5=8f8eddfd873b1e548449d8f4c9c7b38b&pid=1-s2.0-S0167880924003736-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can earthworms and root traits improve plant struvite-P uptake? A field mesocosm study\",\"authors\":\"Laura M.E. Ferron ,&nbsp;Jan Willem Van Groenigen ,&nbsp;Gerwin F. Koopmans ,&nbsp;Alix Vidal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The availability of conventional linear mineral phosphorus (P) fertilization will become lower as phosphate rock stocks are limited and strongly concentrated in a few locations. Therefore, we need to increase agronomic P use efficiency and find alternative, recycled, sources of P. Two possible solutions mentioned in the literature are (i) using struvite, a mineral circular P fertilizer; and (ii) making use of earthworm activity, which has been shown to increase P availability. Here, we study the interaction between these two approaches, with the hypothesis that earthworms could increase the P availability from the poorly soluble struvite. We set up a field-based mesocosm experiment in a sandy soil with a low agronomic P status with 13 different treatments combining three earthworms species (<em>Lumbricus rubellus</em> Hoffmeister, <em>Aporrectodea caliginosa</em> Savigny and <em>A. longa</em> Ude alone or in a threes species mixture), different P fertilizers (no P, Triple Super Phosphate (TSP) and struvite). The experiment lasted 13 months (five fertilisation-harvest cycles). We found that, in field conditions, the yield and P uptake of <em>Lolium perenne</em> did not differ between fertilization with struvite or TSP. Earthworms only played a minor role in explaining ryegrass P uptake compared to fertilisation. We did not see either positive nor negative interactions between earthworms and struvite, meaning that earthworms did not further increase the P availability from struvite. The equal performances of struvite and TSP are explained by an enhanced effort from plants to actively take up P through a modification of root traits. This includes increased arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonisation and the production of finer and longer roots. Our results show that struvite performs comparably to TSP under realistic field conditions, making it a viable alternative to phosphate rock-based fertilizers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"volume\":\"377 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924003736/pdfft?md5=8f8eddfd873b1e548449d8f4c9c7b38b&pid=1-s2.0-S0167880924003736-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924003736\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924003736","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于磷矿石存量有限且主要集中在少数几个地方,传统的线性矿物磷(P)肥的可用性将越来越低。因此,我们需要提高农艺磷肥的利用效率,并寻找可替代的、可循环利用的磷肥来源。文献中提到的两种可能的解决方案是:(i) 使用硬石膏(一种矿物循环磷肥);(ii) 利用蚯蚓的活动,因为蚯蚓的活动已被证明可提高磷肥的可用性。在此,我们研究了这两种方法之间的相互作用,假设蚯蚓可以增加溶解性较差的硬石膏中的钾含量。我们在农艺钾含量较低的沙质土壤中建立了一个田间中观试验,采用 13 种不同的处理方法,将三种蚯蚓(Lumbricus rubellus Hoffmeister、Aporrectodea caliginosa Savigny 和 A. longa Ude)、不同的钾肥(无钾、三重过磷酸钙(TSP)和硬石膏)单独或混合使用。实验持续了 13 个月(五个施肥-收获周期)。我们发现,在田间条件下,施用石灰岩肥料和三过磷酸钙肥料对欧洲旱金莲的产量和钾吸收量没有影响。与施肥相比,蚯蚓对黑麦草吸收钾的作用很小。我们没有发现蚯蚓与叶绿石之间存在正向或负向的相互作用,这意味着蚯蚓不会进一步提高叶绿石的钾供应量。叶绿素和总磷酸盐表现相同的原因是,植物通过改变根系特征,加强了主动吸收钾的努力。这包括增加了丛枝菌根真菌的定植以及产生更细更长的根系。我们的研究结果表明,在现实的田间条件下,硬石膏的表现与三羟甲基氨基甲酸乙酯不相上下,使其成为磷矿石肥料的可行替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can earthworms and root traits improve plant struvite-P uptake? A field mesocosm study

The availability of conventional linear mineral phosphorus (P) fertilization will become lower as phosphate rock stocks are limited and strongly concentrated in a few locations. Therefore, we need to increase agronomic P use efficiency and find alternative, recycled, sources of P. Two possible solutions mentioned in the literature are (i) using struvite, a mineral circular P fertilizer; and (ii) making use of earthworm activity, which has been shown to increase P availability. Here, we study the interaction between these two approaches, with the hypothesis that earthworms could increase the P availability from the poorly soluble struvite. We set up a field-based mesocosm experiment in a sandy soil with a low agronomic P status with 13 different treatments combining three earthworms species (Lumbricus rubellus Hoffmeister, Aporrectodea caliginosa Savigny and A. longa Ude alone or in a threes species mixture), different P fertilizers (no P, Triple Super Phosphate (TSP) and struvite). The experiment lasted 13 months (five fertilisation-harvest cycles). We found that, in field conditions, the yield and P uptake of Lolium perenne did not differ between fertilization with struvite or TSP. Earthworms only played a minor role in explaining ryegrass P uptake compared to fertilisation. We did not see either positive nor negative interactions between earthworms and struvite, meaning that earthworms did not further increase the P availability from struvite. The equal performances of struvite and TSP are explained by an enhanced effort from plants to actively take up P through a modification of root traits. This includes increased arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonisation and the production of finer and longer roots. Our results show that struvite performs comparably to TSP under realistic field conditions, making it a viable alternative to phosphate rock-based fertilizers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信