{"title":"台湾 A 型血友病患者和护理人员的治疗偏好:离散选择实验","authors":"Shyh-Shin Chiou MD, PhD , Te-Fu Weng MD , Jiaan-Der Wang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study evaluated the treatment preferences among patients and caregivers for moderate or severe hemophilia A in Taiwan.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study used a discrete choice experiment approach to assess treatment preferences among patients with hemophilia A and their caregivers. Respondents chose between 2 hypothetical treatments defined by 7 attributes including no bleeding episode, treated events of joint bleeding, long-term safety, type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events, administration frequency, consumption route, and monitoring dosing options. Preference weights and relative importance (RI) of attributes were estimated using a hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 51 eligible respondents completed the discrete choice experiment (patients, 76.5%; caregivers, 23.5%). Most patients (70.6%) had severe hemophilia and 43.1% received prophylactic treatment for >10 years. Respondents valued “type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events” as the most important factor (RI 26.2%; 95% CI 20.9-31.5) followed by “consumption route” (RI 25.8%; 95% CI 20.7-30.9) and “administration frequency” (RI 15.2%; 95% CI 12.0-18.4). “Monitoring dosing options” was the least important attribute (RI 6.3%; 95% CI 5.2-7.4). Respondents had 63% possibility to choose a treatment profile that has factor VIII product compared with nonfactor product.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients and caregivers valued “type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events” as the most important driver in choosing a treatment for moderate or severe hemophilia A. This study provides important insights into patients’ preferences and informs clinicians to consider patients’ choices when prescribing a treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 101035"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000682/pdfft?md5=eece8a4c30e36a203836a47cc0ac3c96&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109924000682-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Hemophilia A Treatment in Taiwan: A Discrete Choice Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Shyh-Shin Chiou MD, PhD , Te-Fu Weng MD , Jiaan-Der Wang MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study evaluated the treatment preferences among patients and caregivers for moderate or severe hemophilia A in Taiwan.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study used a discrete choice experiment approach to assess treatment preferences among patients with hemophilia A and their caregivers. Respondents chose between 2 hypothetical treatments defined by 7 attributes including no bleeding episode, treated events of joint bleeding, long-term safety, type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events, administration frequency, consumption route, and monitoring dosing options. Preference weights and relative importance (RI) of attributes were estimated using a hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 51 eligible respondents completed the discrete choice experiment (patients, 76.5%; caregivers, 23.5%). Most patients (70.6%) had severe hemophilia and 43.1% received prophylactic treatment for >10 years. Respondents valued “type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events” as the most important factor (RI 26.2%; 95% CI 20.9-31.5) followed by “consumption route” (RI 25.8%; 95% CI 20.7-30.9) and “administration frequency” (RI 15.2%; 95% CI 12.0-18.4). “Monitoring dosing options” was the least important attribute (RI 6.3%; 95% CI 5.2-7.4). Respondents had 63% possibility to choose a treatment profile that has factor VIII product compared with nonfactor product.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients and caregivers valued “type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events” as the most important driver in choosing a treatment for moderate or severe hemophilia A. This study provides important insights into patients’ preferences and informs clinicians to consider patients’ choices when prescribing a treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000682/pdfft?md5=eece8a4c30e36a203836a47cc0ac3c96&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109924000682-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究评估了台湾中度或重度血友病 A 患者及其护理人员的治疗偏好。方法本横断面研究采用离散选择实验法评估血友病 A 患者及其护理人员的治疗偏好。受访者在两种假设的治疗方法中进行选择,这两种治疗方法由 7 个属性定义,包括无出血发作、经治疗的关节出血事件、长期安全性、治疗类型和血栓栓塞事件风险、给药频率、给药途径和监测剂量选项。结果 共有 51 名符合条件的受访者完成了离散选择实验(患者占 76.5%;护理人员占 23.5%)。大多数患者(70.6%)患有严重血友病,43.1%的患者接受了长达 10 年的预防性治疗。受访者认为 "治疗类型和血栓栓塞事件风险 "是最重要的因素(RI 26.2%;95% CI 20.9-31.5),其次是 "服用途径"(RI 25.8%;95% CI 20.7-30.9)和 "给药频率"(RI 15.2%;95% CI 12.0-18.4)。"监测剂量选择 "是最不重要的属性(相关系数 6.3%;95% CI 5.2-7.4)。结论患者和护理人员认为 "治疗类型和血栓栓塞事件的风险 "是选择中度或重度 A 型血友病治疗方法的最重要因素。
Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Hemophilia A Treatment in Taiwan: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Objectives
This study evaluated the treatment preferences among patients and caregivers for moderate or severe hemophilia A in Taiwan.
Methods
This cross-sectional study used a discrete choice experiment approach to assess treatment preferences among patients with hemophilia A and their caregivers. Respondents chose between 2 hypothetical treatments defined by 7 attributes including no bleeding episode, treated events of joint bleeding, long-term safety, type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events, administration frequency, consumption route, and monitoring dosing options. Preference weights and relative importance (RI) of attributes were estimated using a hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression model.
Results
A total of 51 eligible respondents completed the discrete choice experiment (patients, 76.5%; caregivers, 23.5%). Most patients (70.6%) had severe hemophilia and 43.1% received prophylactic treatment for >10 years. Respondents valued “type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events” as the most important factor (RI 26.2%; 95% CI 20.9-31.5) followed by “consumption route” (RI 25.8%; 95% CI 20.7-30.9) and “administration frequency” (RI 15.2%; 95% CI 12.0-18.4). “Monitoring dosing options” was the least important attribute (RI 6.3%; 95% CI 5.2-7.4). Respondents had 63% possibility to choose a treatment profile that has factor VIII product compared with nonfactor product.
Conclusions
Patients and caregivers valued “type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events” as the most important driver in choosing a treatment for moderate or severe hemophilia A. This study provides important insights into patients’ preferences and informs clinicians to consider patients’ choices when prescribing a treatment.