台湾 A 型血友病患者和护理人员的治疗偏好:离散选择实验

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Shyh-Shin Chiou MD, PhD , Te-Fu Weng MD , Jiaan-Der Wang MD, PhD
{"title":"台湾 A 型血友病患者和护理人员的治疗偏好:离散选择实验","authors":"Shyh-Shin Chiou MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Te-Fu Weng MD ,&nbsp;Jiaan-Der Wang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study evaluated the treatment preferences among patients and caregivers for moderate or severe hemophilia A in Taiwan.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study used a discrete choice experiment approach to assess treatment preferences among patients with hemophilia A and their caregivers. Respondents chose between 2 hypothetical treatments defined by 7 attributes including no bleeding episode, treated events of joint bleeding, long-term safety, type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events, administration frequency, consumption route, and monitoring dosing options. Preference weights and relative importance (RI) of attributes were estimated using a hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 51 eligible respondents completed the discrete choice experiment (patients, 76.5%; caregivers, 23.5%). Most patients (70.6%) had severe hemophilia and 43.1% received prophylactic treatment for &gt;10 years. Respondents valued “type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events” as the most important factor (RI 26.2%; 95% CI 20.9-31.5) followed by “consumption route” (RI 25.8%; 95% CI 20.7-30.9) and “administration frequency” (RI 15.2%; 95% CI 12.0-18.4). “Monitoring dosing options” was the least important attribute (RI 6.3%; 95% CI 5.2-7.4). Respondents had 63% possibility to choose a treatment profile that has factor VIII product compared with nonfactor product.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients and caregivers valued “type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events” as the most important driver in choosing a treatment for moderate or severe hemophilia A. This study provides important insights into patients’ preferences and informs clinicians to consider patients’ choices when prescribing a treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 101035"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000682/pdfft?md5=eece8a4c30e36a203836a47cc0ac3c96&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109924000682-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Hemophilia A Treatment in Taiwan: A Discrete Choice Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Shyh-Shin Chiou MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Te-Fu Weng MD ,&nbsp;Jiaan-Der Wang MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study evaluated the treatment preferences among patients and caregivers for moderate or severe hemophilia A in Taiwan.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study used a discrete choice experiment approach to assess treatment preferences among patients with hemophilia A and their caregivers. Respondents chose between 2 hypothetical treatments defined by 7 attributes including no bleeding episode, treated events of joint bleeding, long-term safety, type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events, administration frequency, consumption route, and monitoring dosing options. Preference weights and relative importance (RI) of attributes were estimated using a hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 51 eligible respondents completed the discrete choice experiment (patients, 76.5%; caregivers, 23.5%). Most patients (70.6%) had severe hemophilia and 43.1% received prophylactic treatment for &gt;10 years. Respondents valued “type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events” as the most important factor (RI 26.2%; 95% CI 20.9-31.5) followed by “consumption route” (RI 25.8%; 95% CI 20.7-30.9) and “administration frequency” (RI 15.2%; 95% CI 12.0-18.4). “Monitoring dosing options” was the least important attribute (RI 6.3%; 95% CI 5.2-7.4). Respondents had 63% possibility to choose a treatment profile that has factor VIII product compared with nonfactor product.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients and caregivers valued “type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events” as the most important driver in choosing a treatment for moderate or severe hemophilia A. This study provides important insights into patients’ preferences and informs clinicians to consider patients’ choices when prescribing a treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000682/pdfft?md5=eece8a4c30e36a203836a47cc0ac3c96&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109924000682-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了台湾中度或重度血友病 A 患者及其护理人员的治疗偏好。方法本横断面研究采用离散选择实验法评估血友病 A 患者及其护理人员的治疗偏好。受访者在两种假设的治疗方法中进行选择,这两种治疗方法由 7 个属性定义,包括无出血发作、经治疗的关节出血事件、长期安全性、治疗类型和血栓栓塞事件风险、给药频率、给药途径和监测剂量选项。结果 共有 51 名符合条件的受访者完成了离散选择实验(患者占 76.5%;护理人员占 23.5%)。大多数患者(70.6%)患有严重血友病,43.1%的患者接受了长达 10 年的预防性治疗。受访者认为 "治疗类型和血栓栓塞事件风险 "是最重要的因素(RI 26.2%;95% CI 20.9-31.5),其次是 "服用途径"(RI 25.8%;95% CI 20.7-30.9)和 "给药频率"(RI 15.2%;95% CI 12.0-18.4)。"监测剂量选择 "是最不重要的属性(相关系数 6.3%;95% CI 5.2-7.4)。结论患者和护理人员认为 "治疗类型和血栓栓塞事件的风险 "是选择中度或重度 A 型血友病治疗方法的最重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Hemophilia A Treatment in Taiwan: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Objectives

This study evaluated the treatment preferences among patients and caregivers for moderate or severe hemophilia A in Taiwan.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used a discrete choice experiment approach to assess treatment preferences among patients with hemophilia A and their caregivers. Respondents chose between 2 hypothetical treatments defined by 7 attributes including no bleeding episode, treated events of joint bleeding, long-term safety, type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events, administration frequency, consumption route, and monitoring dosing options. Preference weights and relative importance (RI) of attributes were estimated using a hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression model.

Results

A total of 51 eligible respondents completed the discrete choice experiment (patients, 76.5%; caregivers, 23.5%). Most patients (70.6%) had severe hemophilia and 43.1% received prophylactic treatment for >10 years. Respondents valued “type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events” as the most important factor (RI 26.2%; 95% CI 20.9-31.5) followed by “consumption route” (RI 25.8%; 95% CI 20.7-30.9) and “administration frequency” (RI 15.2%; 95% CI 12.0-18.4). “Monitoring dosing options” was the least important attribute (RI 6.3%; 95% CI 5.2-7.4). Respondents had 63% possibility to choose a treatment profile that has factor VIII product compared with nonfactor product.

Conclusions

Patients and caregivers valued “type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events” as the most important driver in choosing a treatment for moderate or severe hemophilia A. This study provides important insights into patients’ preferences and informs clinicians to consider patients’ choices when prescribing a treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信