VATICAN(呼吸机相关气管支气管炎抗生素评估倡议):针对呼吸机相关气管支气管炎的观察等待与抗菌治疗的多中心随机开放标签试验方案。

Critical care science Pub Date : 2024-08-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20240029-en
Bruno Martins Tomazini, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen, Camila Dietrich, Ana Paula Rossi Gandara, Debora Patrícia Silva, Carla Cristina Gomes Pinheiro, Mariane Nascimento Luz, Renata Rodrigues de Mattos, Luiz Fernando Lima Reis, Roberta Muriel Longo Roepke, Carlos Sérgio Luna Gomes Duarte, Antônio Paulo Nassar Júnior, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Beatriz Arns, Giovanna Marssola Nascimento, Adriano José Pereira, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo
{"title":"VATICAN(呼吸机相关气管支气管炎抗生素评估倡议):针对呼吸机相关气管支气管炎的观察等待与抗菌治疗的多中心随机开放标签试验方案。","authors":"Bruno Martins Tomazini, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen, Camila Dietrich, Ana Paula Rossi Gandara, Debora Patrícia Silva, Carla Cristina Gomes Pinheiro, Mariane Nascimento Luz, Renata Rodrigues de Mattos, Luiz Fernando Lima Reis, Roberta Muriel Longo Roepke, Carlos Sérgio Luna Gomes Duarte, Antônio Paulo Nassar Júnior, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Beatriz Arns, Giovanna Marssola Nascimento, Adriano José Pereira, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240029-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis is a common condition among invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units, for which the best treatment strategy is currently unknown. We designed the VATICAN (Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis Initiative to Conduct Antibiotic Evaluation) trial to assess whether a watchful waiting antibiotic treatment strategy is noninferior to routine antibiotic treatment for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis regarding days free of mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VATICAN is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter noninferiority trial. Patients with suspected ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis without evidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia or hemodynamic instability due to probable infection will be assigned to either a watchful waiting strategy, without antimicrobial administration for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and prescription of antimicrobials only in cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis or septic shock, or another infectious diagnosis, or to a routine antimicrobial treatment strategy for seven days. The primary outcome will be mechanical ventilation-free days at 28 days, and a key secondary outcome will be ventilator-associated pneumonia-free survival. Through an intention-to-treat framework with a per-protocol sensitivity analysis, the primary outcome analysis will address noninferiority with a 20% margin, which translates to a 1.5 difference in ventilator-free days. Other analyses will follow a superiority analysis framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The VATICAN trial will follow all national and international ethical standards. We aim to publish the trial in a high-visibility general journal and present it at critical care and infectious disease conferences for dissemination. These results will likely be immediately applicable to the bedside upon trial completion and will provide information with a low risk of bias for guideline development.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VATICAN (Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis Initiative to Conduct Antibiotic Evaluation): protocol for a multicenter randomized open-label trial of watchful waiting versus antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Martins Tomazini, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen, Camila Dietrich, Ana Paula Rossi Gandara, Debora Patrícia Silva, Carla Cristina Gomes Pinheiro, Mariane Nascimento Luz, Renata Rodrigues de Mattos, Luiz Fernando Lima Reis, Roberta Muriel Longo Roepke, Carlos Sérgio Luna Gomes Duarte, Antônio Paulo Nassar Júnior, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Beatriz Arns, Giovanna Marssola Nascimento, Adriano José Pereira, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo\",\"doi\":\"10.62675/2965-2774.20240029-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis is a common condition among invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units, for which the best treatment strategy is currently unknown. We designed the VATICAN (Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis Initiative to Conduct Antibiotic Evaluation) trial to assess whether a watchful waiting antibiotic treatment strategy is noninferior to routine antibiotic treatment for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis regarding days free of mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VATICAN is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter noninferiority trial. Patients with suspected ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis without evidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia or hemodynamic instability due to probable infection will be assigned to either a watchful waiting strategy, without antimicrobial administration for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and prescription of antimicrobials only in cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis or septic shock, or another infectious diagnosis, or to a routine antimicrobial treatment strategy for seven days. The primary outcome will be mechanical ventilation-free days at 28 days, and a key secondary outcome will be ventilator-associated pneumonia-free survival. Through an intention-to-treat framework with a per-protocol sensitivity analysis, the primary outcome analysis will address noninferiority with a 20% margin, which translates to a 1.5 difference in ventilator-free days. Other analyses will follow a superiority analysis framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The VATICAN trial will follow all national and international ethical standards. We aim to publish the trial in a high-visibility general journal and present it at critical care and infectious disease conferences for dissemination. These results will likely be immediately applicable to the bedside upon trial completion and will provide information with a low risk of bias for guideline development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321716/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240029-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240029-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:呼吸机相关气管支气管炎是重症监护病房有创通气患者的常见病,目前尚不清楚最佳治疗策略。我们设计了 VATICAN(呼吸机相关气管支气管炎抗生素评估倡议)试验,以评估在无机械通气天数方面,观察等待抗生素治疗策略是否不劣于常规抗生素治疗呼吸机相关气管支气管炎:VATICAN 是一项随机对照、开放标签、多中心非劣效性试验。疑似呼吸机相关性气管支气管炎但无呼吸机相关性肺炎证据或因可能感染导致血流动力学不稳定的患者将被分配到观察等待策略(不对呼吸机相关性气管支气管炎使用抗菌药物,仅在呼吸机相关性肺炎、败血症或脓毒性休克或其他感染性诊断病例中使用抗菌药物)或常规抗菌药物治疗策略(7 天)中。主要结果是 28 天内无机械通气天数,次要结果是无呼吸机相关性肺炎存活率。通过意向治疗框架和每方案敏感性分析,主要结果分析将以20%的差值(即无呼吸机天数相差1.5天)进行非劣效性分析。其他分析将遵循优效性分析框架:VATICAN试验将遵循所有国家和国际伦理标准。我们的目标是在知名度较高的综合性期刊上发表试验结果,并在重症监护和传染病会议上进行宣传。试验完成后,这些结果可能会立即应用于床边治疗,并为指南制定提供低偏倚风险的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
VATICAN (Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis Initiative to Conduct Antibiotic Evaluation): protocol for a multicenter randomized open-label trial of watchful waiting versus antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.

Background: Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis is a common condition among invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units, for which the best treatment strategy is currently unknown. We designed the VATICAN (Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis Initiative to Conduct Antibiotic Evaluation) trial to assess whether a watchful waiting antibiotic treatment strategy is noninferior to routine antibiotic treatment for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis regarding days free of mechanical ventilation.

Methods: VATICAN is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter noninferiority trial. Patients with suspected ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis without evidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia or hemodynamic instability due to probable infection will be assigned to either a watchful waiting strategy, without antimicrobial administration for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and prescription of antimicrobials only in cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis or septic shock, or another infectious diagnosis, or to a routine antimicrobial treatment strategy for seven days. The primary outcome will be mechanical ventilation-free days at 28 days, and a key secondary outcome will be ventilator-associated pneumonia-free survival. Through an intention-to-treat framework with a per-protocol sensitivity analysis, the primary outcome analysis will address noninferiority with a 20% margin, which translates to a 1.5 difference in ventilator-free days. Other analyses will follow a superiority analysis framework.

Conclusion: The VATICAN trial will follow all national and international ethical standards. We aim to publish the trial in a high-visibility general journal and present it at critical care and infectious disease conferences for dissemination. These results will likely be immediately applicable to the bedside upon trial completion and will provide information with a low risk of bias for guideline development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信