Zsuzsanna Arnold, Alexander Elnekheli, Daniela Geisler, Thomas Aschacher, Verena Lenz, Bernhard Winkler, Reinhard Moidl, Martin Grabenwöger
{"title":"主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣反流后的左心室反向重塑--一项探索性研究。","authors":"Zsuzsanna Arnold, Alexander Elnekheli, Daniela Geisler, Thomas Aschacher, Verena Lenz, Bernhard Winkler, Reinhard Moidl, Martin Grabenwöger","doi":"10.3390/diseases12080191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The timing of treatment for chronic aortic valve regurgitation (AR), especially in asymptomatic patients, is gaining attention since less invasive strategies have become available. The aim of the present study was to evaluate left ventricular reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe AR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (n = 25) who underwent surgical AVR for severe AR with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 55% were included in this study. Preprocedural and follow-up clinical and echocardiographic measurements of LVEF and left ventricular (LV) diameters were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean LVEF increased significantly following surgical AVR (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). LV diameters showed a clear regression (<i>p</i> = 0.0088). Younger patients and those receiving a mechanical valve tended to have less improved LVEF on follow-up than patients over 60 years or the ones who were implanted with a biological prosthesis (<i>p</i> = 0.0239 and <i>p</i> = 0.069, respectively). Gender had no effect on the degree of LVEF improvement (<i>p</i> = 0.4908).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated significant LV reverse remodeling following AVR for AR. However, more data are needed on LV functional and geometrical improvement comparing the different types of valve prostheses to provide an optimal treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":72832,"journal":{"name":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling after Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Regurgitation-An Explorative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zsuzsanna Arnold, Alexander Elnekheli, Daniela Geisler, Thomas Aschacher, Verena Lenz, Bernhard Winkler, Reinhard Moidl, Martin Grabenwöger\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diseases12080191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The timing of treatment for chronic aortic valve regurgitation (AR), especially in asymptomatic patients, is gaining attention since less invasive strategies have become available. The aim of the present study was to evaluate left ventricular reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe AR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (n = 25) who underwent surgical AVR for severe AR with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 55% were included in this study. Preprocedural and follow-up clinical and echocardiographic measurements of LVEF and left ventricular (LV) diameters were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean LVEF increased significantly following surgical AVR (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). LV diameters showed a clear regression (<i>p</i> = 0.0088). Younger patients and those receiving a mechanical valve tended to have less improved LVEF on follow-up than patients over 60 years or the ones who were implanted with a biological prosthesis (<i>p</i> = 0.0239 and <i>p</i> = 0.069, respectively). Gender had no effect on the degree of LVEF improvement (<i>p</i> = 0.4908).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated significant LV reverse remodeling following AVR for AR. However, more data are needed on LV functional and geometrical improvement comparing the different types of valve prostheses to provide an optimal treatment strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"12 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353267/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12080191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12080191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:慢性主动脉瓣反流(AR)的治疗时机,尤其是无症状患者的治疗时机,随着微创策略的出现而日益受到关注。本研究旨在评估主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)治疗严重主动脉瓣反流后左心室反向重塑的情况:本研究纳入了因左室射血分数(LVEF)小于 55% 的重度 AR 而接受手术 AVR 的患者(n = 25)。回顾性分析了手术前和随访期间 LVEF 和左心室(LV)直径的临床和超声心动图测量结果:结果:手术 AVR 后,平均 LVEF 明显增加(p < 0.0001)。左心室直径出现了明显的回归(p = 0.0088)。与 60 岁以上的患者或植入生物假体的患者相比,年轻患者和接受机械瓣膜的患者随访时 LVEF 的改善程度较低(分别为 p = 0.0239 和 p = 0.069)。性别对 LVEF 的改善程度没有影响(p = 0.4908):结论:我们证实了因 AR 而进行 AVR 后左心室逆向重塑的显著性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,AVR 术后左心室逆向重塑效果显著,但还需要更多关于左心室功能和几何改善的数据,并对不同类型的瓣膜假体进行比较,以提供最佳治疗策略。
Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling after Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Regurgitation-An Explorative Study.
Background: The timing of treatment for chronic aortic valve regurgitation (AR), especially in asymptomatic patients, is gaining attention since less invasive strategies have become available. The aim of the present study was to evaluate left ventricular reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe AR.
Methods: Patients (n = 25) who underwent surgical AVR for severe AR with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 55% were included in this study. Preprocedural and follow-up clinical and echocardiographic measurements of LVEF and left ventricular (LV) diameters were retrospectively analyzed.
Results: Mean LVEF increased significantly following surgical AVR (p < 0.0001). LV diameters showed a clear regression (p = 0.0088). Younger patients and those receiving a mechanical valve tended to have less improved LVEF on follow-up than patients over 60 years or the ones who were implanted with a biological prosthesis (p = 0.0239 and p = 0.069, respectively). Gender had no effect on the degree of LVEF improvement (p = 0.4908).
Conclusions: We demonstrated significant LV reverse remodeling following AVR for AR. However, more data are needed on LV functional and geometrical improvement comparing the different types of valve prostheses to provide an optimal treatment strategy.