蒙特利尔认知评估是区分阿尔茨海默病、额颞叶痴呆、路易体痴呆和血管性痴呆的重要测试吗?

Q3 Medicine
Dementia e Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2024-08-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0124
Fatemeh Afrashteh, Mostafa Almasi-Dooghaee, Naser Kamyari, Rayan Rajabi, Hamid Reza Baradaran
{"title":"蒙特利尔认知评估是区分阿尔茨海默病、额颞叶痴呆、路易体痴呆和血管性痴呆的重要测试吗?","authors":"Fatemeh Afrashteh, Mostafa Almasi-Dooghaee, Naser Kamyari, Rayan Rajabi, Hamid Reza Baradaran","doi":"10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dementia is one of the growing diseases in the world and has different types based on its definition. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test has been employed to screen patients with dementia, cognitive impairment, and disruption of daily activities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the diagnostic value of the total MoCA score and its subscores in differentiating Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), dementia with Lewy body (DLB), and vascular dementia (VaD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 241 patients (AD=110, FTD=90, DLB=28, and VaD=13) and 59 healthy persons, who were referred to a dementia clinic with memory impairment in Firoozgar Hospital, were included in this study. MoCA tests were performed in all patients and normal persons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and measuring the area under the curve (AUC) for the total MoCA score in each group, AUC was 0.616, 0.681, 0.6117, and 0.583 for differentiating AD, FTD, DLB, and VaD patients, respectively. Among the groups, just the VaD group showed no significant usefulness in using the total MoCA score to differentiate it. To compare MoCA subscores, AD patients had higher scores in digit span, literal fluency, and abstraction but lower delayed recall scores compared with FTD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The total MoCA score and its subscores could not differentiate people with different types of dementia in the setting of screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":39167,"journal":{"name":"Dementia e Neuropsychologia","volume":"18 ","pages":"e20230124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Montreal Cognitive Assessment a valuable test for the differentiation of Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, dementia with Lewy body, and vascular dementia?\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Afrashteh, Mostafa Almasi-Dooghaee, Naser Kamyari, Rayan Rajabi, Hamid Reza Baradaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dementia is one of the growing diseases in the world and has different types based on its definition. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test has been employed to screen patients with dementia, cognitive impairment, and disruption of daily activities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the diagnostic value of the total MoCA score and its subscores in differentiating Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), dementia with Lewy body (DLB), and vascular dementia (VaD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 241 patients (AD=110, FTD=90, DLB=28, and VaD=13) and 59 healthy persons, who were referred to a dementia clinic with memory impairment in Firoozgar Hospital, were included in this study. MoCA tests were performed in all patients and normal persons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and measuring the area under the curve (AUC) for the total MoCA score in each group, AUC was 0.616, 0.681, 0.6117, and 0.583 for differentiating AD, FTD, DLB, and VaD patients, respectively. Among the groups, just the VaD group showed no significant usefulness in using the total MoCA score to differentiate it. To compare MoCA subscores, AD patients had higher scores in digit span, literal fluency, and abstraction but lower delayed recall scores compared with FTD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The total MoCA score and its subscores could not differentiate people with different types of dementia in the setting of screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia e Neuropsychologia\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"e20230124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia e Neuropsychologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia e Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

痴呆症是世界上日益增多的疾病之一,根据其定义有不同的类型。蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)测试已被用于筛查痴呆、认知障碍和日常活动障碍患者:本研究探讨了 MoCA 总分及其子分在区分阿尔茨海默病(AD)、额颞叶痴呆(FTD)、路易体痴呆(DLB)和血管性痴呆(VaD)方面的诊断价值:本研究共纳入了241名患者(AD=110人、FTD=90人、DLB=28人和VaD=13人)和59名健康人,他们都是因记忆力受损而被转诊到菲罗兹加医院痴呆症门诊的。对所有患者和正常人进行了MoCA测试:通过使用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)和测量各组 MoCA 总分的曲线下面积(AUC),区分 AD、FTD、DLB 和 VaD 患者的 AUC 分别为 0.616、0.681、0.6117 和 0.583。在各组中,只有 VaD 组在使用 MoCA 总分进行区分时没有显示出明显的作用。与FTD患者相比,比较MoCA的子分数,AD患者在数字跨度、文字流畅性和抽象性方面的分数较高,但延迟回忆分数较低:结论:在筛查过程中,MoCA总分及其分值无法区分不同类型的痴呆症患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Montreal Cognitive Assessment a valuable test for the differentiation of Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, dementia with Lewy body, and vascular dementia?

Dementia is one of the growing diseases in the world and has different types based on its definition. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test has been employed to screen patients with dementia, cognitive impairment, and disruption of daily activities.

Objective: This study examined the diagnostic value of the total MoCA score and its subscores in differentiating Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), dementia with Lewy body (DLB), and vascular dementia (VaD).

Methods: A total of 241 patients (AD=110, FTD=90, DLB=28, and VaD=13) and 59 healthy persons, who were referred to a dementia clinic with memory impairment in Firoozgar Hospital, were included in this study. MoCA tests were performed in all patients and normal persons.

Results: By using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and measuring the area under the curve (AUC) for the total MoCA score in each group, AUC was 0.616, 0.681, 0.6117, and 0.583 for differentiating AD, FTD, DLB, and VaD patients, respectively. Among the groups, just the VaD group showed no significant usefulness in using the total MoCA score to differentiate it. To compare MoCA subscores, AD patients had higher scores in digit span, literal fluency, and abstraction but lower delayed recall scores compared with FTD patients.

Conclusion: The total MoCA score and its subscores could not differentiate people with different types of dementia in the setting of screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dementia e Neuropsychologia
Dementia e Neuropsychologia Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dementia top Neuropsychologia the official scientific journal of the Cognitive Neurology and Ageing Department of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology and of the Brazilian Association of Geriatric Neuropsychiatry, is published by the "Associação Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento", a nonprofit Brazilian association. Regularly published on March, June, September, and December since 2007.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信