瑞瑞替尼治疗晚期胃肠道间质瘤的效果和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ji Li, Hao Zhang, Xiao-Dong Chen
{"title":"瑞瑞替尼治疗晚期胃肠道间质瘤的效果和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ji Li, Hao Zhang, Xiao-Dong Chen","doi":"10.5306/wjco.v15.i8.1092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Imatinib (IMA) has received approval as the primary treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Nonetheless, approximately half of the patients with advanced GIST show disease advancement following IMA treatment. Presently, the efficacy of secondary and tertiary medications in addressing various GIST secondary mutations is somewhat restricted. Consequently, there is a significant medical demand for the creation of kinase inhibitors that extensively block secondary drug-resistant mutations in advanced GIST. Ripretinib (RPT) is a new, switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitors that can suppress different mutations of KIT and PDGFRA <i>via</i> a dual mechanism of action.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the literature on RPT to assess an effective, safe, and successful treatment strategy against advanced GIST.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were screened from January 1, 2003 to May 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4 studies were included, with a total of 507 patients enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) of the RPT-treated advanced GIST was 17% (95%CI: 0.11-0.27), while the disease control rate (DCR) was 66% (95%CI: 0.59-0.73). The overall occurrence of adverse events with varying degrees was 97% (95%CI: 0.93-1), whereas that of grade ≥ 3 adverse reactions was 42% (95%CI: 0.28-0.63). The sensitivity analysis revealed that omitting some studies did not yield statistically notable variances in the aggregate data regarding the ORR, DCR, and the occurrence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher. The publication bias was absent because no significant asymmetry was observed in Begg's funnel plot in all studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RPT has favorable efficacy profiles in GIST patients, but the adverse reactions are obvious, and patient management needs to be strengthened to achieve better safety and tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23802,"journal":{"name":"World journal of clinical oncology","volume":"15 8","pages":"1092-1101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect and safety of ripretinib in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ji Li, Hao Zhang, Xiao-Dong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.5306/wjco.v15.i8.1092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Imatinib (IMA) has received approval as the primary treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Nonetheless, approximately half of the patients with advanced GIST show disease advancement following IMA treatment. Presently, the efficacy of secondary and tertiary medications in addressing various GIST secondary mutations is somewhat restricted. Consequently, there is a significant medical demand for the creation of kinase inhibitors that extensively block secondary drug-resistant mutations in advanced GIST. Ripretinib (RPT) is a new, switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitors that can suppress different mutations of KIT and PDGFRA <i>via</i> a dual mechanism of action.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the literature on RPT to assess an effective, safe, and successful treatment strategy against advanced GIST.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were screened from January 1, 2003 to May 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4 studies were included, with a total of 507 patients enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) of the RPT-treated advanced GIST was 17% (95%CI: 0.11-0.27), while the disease control rate (DCR) was 66% (95%CI: 0.59-0.73). The overall occurrence of adverse events with varying degrees was 97% (95%CI: 0.93-1), whereas that of grade ≥ 3 adverse reactions was 42% (95%CI: 0.28-0.63). The sensitivity analysis revealed that omitting some studies did not yield statistically notable variances in the aggregate data regarding the ORR, DCR, and the occurrence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher. The publication bias was absent because no significant asymmetry was observed in Begg's funnel plot in all studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RPT has favorable efficacy profiles in GIST patients, but the adverse reactions are obvious, and patient management needs to be strengthened to achieve better safety and tolerability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"1092-1101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346076/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v15.i8.1092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v15.i8.1092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:伊马替尼(IMA)已被批准作为胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的主要治疗药物。然而,约有一半的晚期 GIST 患者在接受 IMA 治疗后病情出现恶化。目前,针对各种 GIST 次级突变的二级和三级药物的疗效受到一定限制。因此,医学界对能广泛阻断晚期 GIST 次级耐药突变的激酶抑制剂有着巨大的需求。Ripretinib(RPT)是一种新型开关控制型酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,可通过双重作用机制抑制KIT和PDGFRA的不同突变:本系统综述和荟萃分析根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南进行。筛选了 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 5 月 1 日期间的 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库:结果:共纳入4项研究,507名患者接受了治疗。RPT治疗晚期GIST的客观反应率(ORR)为17%(95%CI:0.11-0.27),疾病控制率(DCR)为66%(95%CI:0.59-0.73)。不同程度不良反应的总体发生率为97%(95%CI:0.93-1),而≥3级不良反应的发生率为42%(95%CI:0.28-0.63)。敏感性分析表明,省略某些研究并不会在 ORR、DCR 和 3 级或以上不良反应发生率的总体数据上产生显著的统计学差异。由于所有研究的贝格漏斗图均未观察到明显的不对称,因此不存在发表偏倚:结论:RPT对GIST患者具有良好的疗效,但不良反应明显,需要加强患者管理以实现更好的安全性和耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect and safety of ripretinib in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Imatinib (IMA) has received approval as the primary treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Nonetheless, approximately half of the patients with advanced GIST show disease advancement following IMA treatment. Presently, the efficacy of secondary and tertiary medications in addressing various GIST secondary mutations is somewhat restricted. Consequently, there is a significant medical demand for the creation of kinase inhibitors that extensively block secondary drug-resistant mutations in advanced GIST. Ripretinib (RPT) is a new, switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitors that can suppress different mutations of KIT and PDGFRA via a dual mechanism of action.

Aim: To investigate the literature on RPT to assess an effective, safe, and successful treatment strategy against advanced GIST.

Methods: The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were screened from January 1, 2003 to May 1, 2024.

Results: A total of 4 studies were included, with a total of 507 patients enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) of the RPT-treated advanced GIST was 17% (95%CI: 0.11-0.27), while the disease control rate (DCR) was 66% (95%CI: 0.59-0.73). The overall occurrence of adverse events with varying degrees was 97% (95%CI: 0.93-1), whereas that of grade ≥ 3 adverse reactions was 42% (95%CI: 0.28-0.63). The sensitivity analysis revealed that omitting some studies did not yield statistically notable variances in the aggregate data regarding the ORR, DCR, and the occurrence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher. The publication bias was absent because no significant asymmetry was observed in Begg's funnel plot in all studies.

Conclusion: RPT has favorable efficacy profiles in GIST patients, but the adverse reactions are obvious, and patient management needs to be strengthened to achieve better safety and tolerability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
585
期刊介绍: The WJCO is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJCO is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of oncology. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJCO is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJCO are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in oncology. Scope: Art of Oncology, Biology of Neoplasia, Breast Cancer, Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer-Related Complications, Diagnosis in Oncology, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Genetic Testing For Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer, Hematologic Malignancy, Lung Cancer, Melanoma, Molecular Oncology, Neurooncology, Palliative and Supportive Care, Pediatric Oncology, Surgical Oncology, Translational Oncology, and Urologic Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信