术前眼睑和眉毛不对称:潜在的术前知情同意选项:一项描述性横断面研究。

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY
Gholamreza Motazedian, Erfan Sadeghi, Ebtesam Jabbarinia, Ali-Akbar Mohammdi, Fateme Salari, Hamid Reihani, Farnaz Atighi, Alireza Keshtkar
{"title":"术前眼睑和眉毛不对称:潜在的术前知情同意选项:一项描述性横断面研究。","authors":"Gholamreza Motazedian, Erfan Sadeghi, Ebtesam Jabbarinia, Ali-Akbar Mohammdi, Fateme Salari, Hamid Reihani, Farnaz Atighi, Alireza Keshtkar","doi":"10.61186/wjps.13.2.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to determine the prevalence of pre-existing asymmetry in our patients and investigate the impact of age and sex on upper facial asymmetry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected images from 155 patients who were undergoing upper eyelid blepharoplasty and MRD1 (marginal reflex distance 1), TPS (tarsal plate show), and BFS (brow fat span) measurements were extracted by ImageJ software. The relationship between asymmetry and age and gender was assessed by comparing the mean differences of these metrics. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to compare the outcomes of the study. P-value < 0.05 was considered significantly different in all tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-operative asymmetry was present in 112 (72%) patients. Among the cases, 61 (39%), 40 (26%), and 24 (15.5%) patients had more than 1mm of asymmetry in BFS, TPS, and MRD1, respectively. Males under 50 years old had the most asymmetry in the preorbital area. Comparing men under 50 years old with the other groups showed that the mean ± SD of absolute differences of TPS was significantly higher in this group (all P< 0.00), but pairwise comparison for MRD1 and BFS indicated no significant correlation between age, gender, and the mean asymmetry of these parameters (overall test P = 0.70 for MDR1 and P = 0.45 for BFS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients have asymmetry before surgery without being aware of it. Awareness of this asymmetry and the relationship between facial asymmetry and age and gender is essential to prevent dissatisfaction due to the probable post-operative asymmetry and unrealistic expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23736,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"13 2","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative Eyelid and Eyebrow Asymmetry: A Potential Pre-Operation Inform Consent Option: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Gholamreza Motazedian, Erfan Sadeghi, Ebtesam Jabbarinia, Ali-Akbar Mohammdi, Fateme Salari, Hamid Reihani, Farnaz Atighi, Alireza Keshtkar\",\"doi\":\"10.61186/wjps.13.2.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to determine the prevalence of pre-existing asymmetry in our patients and investigate the impact of age and sex on upper facial asymmetry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected images from 155 patients who were undergoing upper eyelid blepharoplasty and MRD1 (marginal reflex distance 1), TPS (tarsal plate show), and BFS (brow fat span) measurements were extracted by ImageJ software. The relationship between asymmetry and age and gender was assessed by comparing the mean differences of these metrics. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to compare the outcomes of the study. P-value < 0.05 was considered significantly different in all tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-operative asymmetry was present in 112 (72%) patients. Among the cases, 61 (39%), 40 (26%), and 24 (15.5%) patients had more than 1mm of asymmetry in BFS, TPS, and MRD1, respectively. Males under 50 years old had the most asymmetry in the preorbital area. Comparing men under 50 years old with the other groups showed that the mean ± SD of absolute differences of TPS was significantly higher in this group (all P< 0.00), but pairwise comparison for MRD1 and BFS indicated no significant correlation between age, gender, and the mean asymmetry of these parameters (overall test P = 0.70 for MDR1 and P = 0.45 for BFS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients have asymmetry before surgery without being aware of it. Awareness of this asymmetry and the relationship between facial asymmetry and age and gender is essential to prevent dissatisfaction due to the probable post-operative asymmetry and unrealistic expectations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"19-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346694/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61186/wjps.13.2.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61186/wjps.13.2.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们的目的是确定患者面部不对称的发生率,并研究年龄和性别对上面部不对称的影响:我们的目的是确定患者原有不对称的普遍程度,并研究年龄和性别对上面部不对称的影响:我们收集了 155 名接受上眼睑重睑术的患者的图像,并通过 ImageJ 软件提取了 MRD1(边缘反射距离 1)、TPS(跗骨板显示)和 BFS(眉脂肪跨度)的测量值。通过比较这些指标的平均差来评估不对称与年龄和性别之间的关系。研究结果采用广义线性模型(GLM)进行比较。在所有测试中,P 值小于 0.05 即为差异显著:112例(72%)患者存在术前不对称。其中,61 例(39%)、40 例(26%)和 24 例(15.5%)患者的 BFS、TPS 和 MRD1 不对称程度超过 1 毫米。50 岁以下男性的眶前区不对称程度最高。将 50 岁以下男性与其他组别进行比较后发现,该组别的 TPS 绝对差异平均值(± SD)显著高于其他组别(均为 P<0.00),但 MRD1 和 BFS 的配对比较表明,年龄、性别与这些参数的平均不对称程度之间没有显著相关性(总体检验 P = 0.70(MDR1)和 P = 0.45(BFS)):结论:大多数患者在手术前都会有不对称的情况,但却没有意识到。结论:大多数患者在手术前都有不对称的情况,但却没有意识到。意识到这种不对称以及面部不对称与年龄和性别之间的关系,对于防止因术后可能出现的不对称和不切实际的期望而引起的不满是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative Eyelid and Eyebrow Asymmetry: A Potential Pre-Operation Inform Consent Option: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: We aimed to determine the prevalence of pre-existing asymmetry in our patients and investigate the impact of age and sex on upper facial asymmetry.

Methods: We collected images from 155 patients who were undergoing upper eyelid blepharoplasty and MRD1 (marginal reflex distance 1), TPS (tarsal plate show), and BFS (brow fat span) measurements were extracted by ImageJ software. The relationship between asymmetry and age and gender was assessed by comparing the mean differences of these metrics. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to compare the outcomes of the study. P-value < 0.05 was considered significantly different in all tests.

Results: Pre-operative asymmetry was present in 112 (72%) patients. Among the cases, 61 (39%), 40 (26%), and 24 (15.5%) patients had more than 1mm of asymmetry in BFS, TPS, and MRD1, respectively. Males under 50 years old had the most asymmetry in the preorbital area. Comparing men under 50 years old with the other groups showed that the mean ± SD of absolute differences of TPS was significantly higher in this group (all P< 0.00), but pairwise comparison for MRD1 and BFS indicated no significant correlation between age, gender, and the mean asymmetry of these parameters (overall test P = 0.70 for MDR1 and P = 0.45 for BFS).

Conclusion: Most patients have asymmetry before surgery without being aware of it. Awareness of this asymmetry and the relationship between facial asymmetry and age and gender is essential to prevent dissatisfaction due to the probable post-operative asymmetry and unrealistic expectations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信