脊柱旁肌肉参数与单节段退行性腰椎骨质疏松症之间的关系:一项回顾性横断面队列研究

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-06-15 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005140
Shuang Liu, Qi Shi, Wei-Wei Da, Chun-Chun Xue, Lin Chen, Yu-Nan Li, Yong-Peng Xue, Wen-Lan Du, Xiao-Feng Li
{"title":"脊柱旁肌肉参数与单节段退行性腰椎骨质疏松症之间的关系:一项回顾性横断面队列研究","authors":"Shuang Liu, Qi Shi, Wei-Wei Da, Chun-Chun Xue, Lin Chen, Yu-Nan Li, Yong-Peng Xue, Wen-Lan Du, Xiao-Feng Li","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the association between paraspinal muscle parameters and single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The relationship between lumbar paraspinal muscle morphology and single-segment DLS remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on 115 patients with L4/5 single-segment DLS and 105 subjects without DLS. Two independent investigators assessed the relative cross-sectional area and fat infiltration rate of the multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major at L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 levels, comparing these measurements between the 2 groups. In addition, binary logistic regression analysis was performed with DLS as the dependent variable to analyze the relative cross-sectional area and fat infiltration rate of different paraspinal muscles. Within the DLS group, the correlation between paraspinal muscle characteristics and the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fat infiltration rate of multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major was higher in the DLS group than in the control group, whereas the relative cross-sectional area of multifidus and psoas major was lower in the DLS group. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between the fat infiltration rate of multifidus and psoas major and DLS. The relative cross-sectional area of multifidus and erector spinae was significantly smaller below the affected segment in the DLS group compared with the control group. A significant positive correlation was observed between the relative cross-sectional area of multifidus and erector spinae and the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a close association between paraspinal muscle degeneration and single-segment DLS, with an increased relative cross-sectional area of the multifidus and psoas major possibly being risk factors for single-segment DLS. The restoration or enhancement of paraspinal muscle function could potentially serve as a pivotal target for the prevention and treatment of single-segment DLS.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"841-848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Paraspinal Muscle Parameters and Single-Segment Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shuang Liu, Qi Shi, Wei-Wei Da, Chun-Chun Xue, Lin Chen, Yu-Nan Li, Yong-Peng Xue, Wen-Lan Du, Xiao-Feng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the association between paraspinal muscle parameters and single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The relationship between lumbar paraspinal muscle morphology and single-segment DLS remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on 115 patients with L4/5 single-segment DLS and 105 subjects without DLS. Two independent investigators assessed the relative cross-sectional area and fat infiltration rate of the multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major at L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 levels, comparing these measurements between the 2 groups. In addition, binary logistic regression analysis was performed with DLS as the dependent variable to analyze the relative cross-sectional area and fat infiltration rate of different paraspinal muscles. Within the DLS group, the correlation between paraspinal muscle characteristics and the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fat infiltration rate of multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major was higher in the DLS group than in the control group, whereas the relative cross-sectional area of multifidus and psoas major was lower in the DLS group. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between the fat infiltration rate of multifidus and psoas major and DLS. The relative cross-sectional area of multifidus and erector spinae was significantly smaller below the affected segment in the DLS group compared with the control group. A significant positive correlation was observed between the relative cross-sectional area of multifidus and erector spinae and the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a close association between paraspinal muscle degeneration and single-segment DLS, with an increased relative cross-sectional area of the multifidus and psoas major possibly being risk factors for single-segment DLS. The restoration or enhancement of paraspinal muscle function could potentially serve as a pivotal target for the prevention and treatment of single-segment DLS.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"841-848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005140\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计回顾性横断面队列研究:本研究旨在探讨脊柱旁肌肉参数与单节段退行性腰椎滑脱症(DLS)之间的关系:腰椎旁肌肉形态与单节段 DLS 之间的关系仍不清楚:方法:对115例L4/5单节段DLS患者和105例无DLS患者进行了回顾性研究。两名独立研究人员评估了 L3/4、L4/5 和 L5/S1 水平的多裂肌、竖脊肌和腰大肌的相对横截面积和脂肪浸润率,并比较了两组之间的这些测量值。此外,还以 DLS 为因变量进行了二元逻辑回归分析,以分析不同脊柱旁肌肉的相对横截面积和脂肪浸润率。在 DLS 组中,研究了脊柱旁肌肉特征与椎管前后径之间的相关性:结果:DLS 组中多裂肌、竖脊肌和腰大肌的脂肪浸润率高于对照组,而多裂肌和腰大肌的相对横截面积则低于对照组。二元逻辑回归分析显示,多裂肌和腰大肌的脂肪浸润率与DLS之间存在显著相关性。与对照组相比,DLS 组受累节段下方的多裂肌和竖脊肌的相对横截面积明显较小。多裂肌和竖脊肌的相对横截面积与椎管前后径之间呈明显的正相关:结论:脊柱旁肌肉退化与单节段 DLS 有密切关系,多裂肌和腰大肌相对横截面积增大可能是单节段 DLS 的危险因素。恢复或增强脊柱旁肌肉功能有可能成为预防和治疗单节段 DLS 的关键目标:证据等级:III.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Paraspinal Muscle Parameters and Single-Segment Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.

Study design: A retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between paraspinal muscle parameters and single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).

Summary of background data: The relationship between lumbar paraspinal muscle morphology and single-segment DLS remains unclear.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 115 patients with L4/5 single-segment DLS and 105 subjects without DLS. Two independent investigators assessed the relative cross-sectional area and fat infiltration rate of the multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major at L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 levels, comparing these measurements between the 2 groups. In addition, binary logistic regression analysis was performed with DLS as the dependent variable to analyze the relative cross-sectional area and fat infiltration rate of different paraspinal muscles. Within the DLS group, the correlation between paraspinal muscle characteristics and the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal was examined.

Results: The fat infiltration rate of multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major was higher in the DLS group than in the control group, whereas the relative cross-sectional area of multifidus and psoas major was lower in the DLS group. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between the fat infiltration rate of multifidus and psoas major and DLS. The relative cross-sectional area of multifidus and erector spinae was significantly smaller below the affected segment in the DLS group compared with the control group. A significant positive correlation was observed between the relative cross-sectional area of multifidus and erector spinae and the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal.

Conclusion: There is a close association between paraspinal muscle degeneration and single-segment DLS, with an increased relative cross-sectional area of the multifidus and psoas major possibly being risk factors for single-segment DLS. The restoration or enhancement of paraspinal muscle function could potentially serve as a pivotal target for the prevention and treatment of single-segment DLS.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信