高强度和低强度激光疗法结合运动疗法对膝骨关节炎疼痛和功能的疗效:系统综述与网络元分析》。

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of lasers in medical sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/jlms.2024.34
Majid Khalilizad, Danial Hosseinzade, Mobin Marzban Abbas Abadi
{"title":"高强度和低强度激光疗法结合运动疗法对膝骨关节炎疼痛和功能的疗效:系统综述与网络元分析》。","authors":"Majid Khalilizad, Danial Hosseinzade, Mobin Marzban Abbas Abadi","doi":"10.34172/jlms.2024.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) combined with exercise therapy (ET) have emerged as effective treatment options for musculoskeletal pain. However, there have remained uncertainties regarding the magnitude of their effects in reducing pain and improving function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Hence, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of available evidence in the literature to answer this query. <b>Methods:</b> A literature search was carried out in Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases without any language restrictions from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2023. We examined randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies that investigated the efficiency of HILT or LLLT plus knee osteoarthritis ET in pain and functional improvement of the knee. We performed a network meta-analysis and provided the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) by pooling the continuous data on the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function score using a random-effects model. <b>Results:</b> In total, 11 eligible RCTs were included. Our analysis revealed significant improvements in the VAS pain and WOMAC function scores on weeks 4 and 8 after interventions in groups treated with LLLT+ET and HILT+ET compared with placebo+ET. Moreover, HILT+ET showed a greater reduction in the VAS pain score (SMD=-1.41; 95% CI: -2.05 to -0.76) and improvement in the WOMAC function score (SMD=-2.20; 95% CI: -3.21 to -1.19) than LLLT+ET in week 8. <b>Conclusion:</b> Based on our findings, both HILT+ET and LLLT+ET treatments effectively reduced pain and improved function, but HILT+ET showed a more significant improvement in both outcomes compared to LLLT+ET.</p>","PeriodicalId":16224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of High-Intensity and Low-Level Laser Therapy Combined With Exercise Therapy on Pain and Function in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Majid Khalilizad, Danial Hosseinzade, Mobin Marzban Abbas Abadi\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jlms.2024.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) combined with exercise therapy (ET) have emerged as effective treatment options for musculoskeletal pain. However, there have remained uncertainties regarding the magnitude of their effects in reducing pain and improving function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Hence, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of available evidence in the literature to answer this query. <b>Methods:</b> A literature search was carried out in Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases without any language restrictions from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2023. We examined randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies that investigated the efficiency of HILT or LLLT plus knee osteoarthritis ET in pain and functional improvement of the knee. We performed a network meta-analysis and provided the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) by pooling the continuous data on the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function score using a random-effects model. <b>Results:</b> In total, 11 eligible RCTs were included. Our analysis revealed significant improvements in the VAS pain and WOMAC function scores on weeks 4 and 8 after interventions in groups treated with LLLT+ET and HILT+ET compared with placebo+ET. Moreover, HILT+ET showed a greater reduction in the VAS pain score (SMD=-1.41; 95% CI: -2.05 to -0.76) and improvement in the WOMAC function score (SMD=-2.20; 95% CI: -3.21 to -1.19) than LLLT+ET in week 8. <b>Conclusion:</b> Based on our findings, both HILT+ET and LLLT+ET treatments effectively reduced pain and improved function, but HILT+ET showed a more significant improvement in both outcomes compared to LLLT+ET.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of lasers in medical sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348445/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of lasers in medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2024.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2024.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:高强度激光疗法(HILT)和低强度激光疗法(LLLT)结合运动疗法(ET)已成为治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的有效方法。然而,这两种疗法在减轻膝关节骨关节炎患者疼痛和改善其功能方面的效果如何仍存在不确定性。因此,我们对文献中的现有证据进行了系统回顾和网络荟萃分析,以解答这一疑问。研究方法我们在 Embase、PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库中进行了文献检索,没有任何语言限制,检索时间为 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日。我们研究了随机对照试验(RCT),这些研究调查了 HILT 或 LLLT 加膝关节骨关节炎 ET 在改善膝关节疼痛和功能方面的效果。我们进行了网络荟萃分析,并通过使用随机效应模型汇集视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)功能评分的连续数据,得出了标准化平均差(SMD)和 95% 置信区间(CI)。研究结果共纳入了 11 项符合条件的 RCT。我们的分析表明,与安慰剂+ET 相比,LLLT+ET 组和 HILT+ET 组在干预后第 4 周和第 8 周的 VAS 疼痛和 WOMAC 功能评分均有明显改善。此外,与 LLLT+ET 相比,HILT+ET 在第 8 周显示出更大的 VAS 疼痛评分降低幅度(SMD=-1.41;95% CI:-2.05 至-0.76)和 WOMAC 功能评分改善幅度(SMD=-2.20;95% CI:-3.21 至-1.19)。结论根据我们的研究结果,HILT+ET 和 LLLT+ET 治疗均能有效减轻疼痛并改善功能,但与 LLLT+ET 相比,HILT+ET 对这两项结果的改善更为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of High-Intensity and Low-Level Laser Therapy Combined With Exercise Therapy on Pain and Function in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Introduction: High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) combined with exercise therapy (ET) have emerged as effective treatment options for musculoskeletal pain. However, there have remained uncertainties regarding the magnitude of their effects in reducing pain and improving function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Hence, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of available evidence in the literature to answer this query. Methods: A literature search was carried out in Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases without any language restrictions from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2023. We examined randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies that investigated the efficiency of HILT or LLLT plus knee osteoarthritis ET in pain and functional improvement of the knee. We performed a network meta-analysis and provided the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) by pooling the continuous data on the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function score using a random-effects model. Results: In total, 11 eligible RCTs were included. Our analysis revealed significant improvements in the VAS pain and WOMAC function scores on weeks 4 and 8 after interventions in groups treated with LLLT+ET and HILT+ET compared with placebo+ET. Moreover, HILT+ET showed a greater reduction in the VAS pain score (SMD=-1.41; 95% CI: -2.05 to -0.76) and improvement in the WOMAC function score (SMD=-2.20; 95% CI: -3.21 to -1.19) than LLLT+ET in week 8. Conclusion: Based on our findings, both HILT+ET and LLLT+ET treatments effectively reduced pain and improved function, but HILT+ET showed a more significant improvement in both outcomes compared to LLLT+ET.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of lasers in medical sciences
Journal of lasers in medical sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences " is a scientific quarterly publication of the Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. This journal received a scientific and research rank from the national medical publication committee. This Journal accepts original papers, review articles, case reports, brief reports, case series, photo assays, letters to the editor, and commentaries in the field of laser, or light in any fields of medicine such as the following medical specialties: -Dermatology -General and Vascular Surgery -Oncology -Cardiology -Dentistry -Urology -Rehabilitation -Ophthalmology -Otorhinolaryngology -Gynecology & Obstetrics -Internal Medicine -Orthopedics -Neurosurgery -Radiology -Pain Medicine (Algology) -Basic Sciences (Stem cell, Cellular and Molecular application and physic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信