使用漏斗形腹腔内网片预防腹股沟旁疝与不使用网片相比:烟囱随机临床试验。

IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Elisa Mäkäräinen, Heikki Wiik, Maziar Nikberg, Jyrki Kössi, Monika Carpelan-Holmström, Tarja Pinta, Kirsi Lehto, Marko Nikki, Jyri Järvinen, Pasi Ohtonen, Tero Rautio
{"title":"使用漏斗形腹腔内网片预防腹股沟旁疝与不使用网片相比:烟囱随机临床试验。","authors":"Elisa Mäkäräinen, Heikki Wiik, Maziar Nikberg, Jyrki Kössi, Monika Carpelan-Holmström, Tarja Pinta, Kirsi Lehto, Marko Nikki, Jyri Järvinen, Pasi Ohtonen, Tero Rautio","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prophylactic placement of a mesh has been suggested to prevent parastomal hernia. Evidence to support this practice is contradictory.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether funnel-shaped permanent synthetic parastomal mesh is effective and safe in parastomal hernia prevention.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Chimney Trial was a randomized single-blinded multicenter trial conducted in 4 hospitals in Finland and 1 in Sweden from February 2019 and September 2021. Of 439 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection or the Hartmann procedure, 143 were enrolled in the trial, 135 received their allocated intervention, and 121 were analyzed at 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to May 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In the intervention group, a permanent colostomy was created with a funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh and compared to a control group with a stoma without the mesh.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measure: </strong>The primary end point was the incidence of computed tomography (CT)-confirmed parastomal hernia 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 68 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [11.6] years; 36 [53% male and 32 [47%] female) who received the intended allocation in the mesh group and 67 (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [11.7] years; 48 [72%] male and 19 [28%] female) who received the intended allocation in the control group. CT scans were available for 58 patients in the mesh group and 59 patients in the control group at the 12-month follow-up. CT scans confirmed parastomal hernia in 6 of 58 patients (10%) in the mesh group compared to 22 of 59 patients (37%) in the control group (difference, 27%; 95% CI, 12-41; P < .001). Clinical parastomal hernia as a secondary outcome was recorded in 1 of 60 patients (2%) in the mesh group compared to 27 of 61 (43%) in the control group (difference, 41%; 95% CI, 29-55; P < .001). The number of patients with Clavien-Dindo class II ileus was 23 (35%) in the mesh group compared to 11 (17%) in the control group (difference, 18%; 95% CI, 3-32; P = .006). Only slight differences between the groups were detected in other stoma-related complications, readmissions, operative time, surgical site infections, reoperations, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, funnel-shaped parastomal mesh prevented a significant number of parastomal hernias without predisposing patients to mesh- or stoma-related complications during 12-month follow-up. The results of this study suggest the funnel-shaped mesh is a feasible option to prevent parastomal hernia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799939.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1244-1250"},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11359091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parastomal Hernia Prevention Using Funnel-Shaped Intra-Abdominal Mesh Compared to No Mesh: The Chimney Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Mäkäräinen, Heikki Wiik, Maziar Nikberg, Jyrki Kössi, Monika Carpelan-Holmström, Tarja Pinta, Kirsi Lehto, Marko Nikki, Jyri Järvinen, Pasi Ohtonen, Tero Rautio\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prophylactic placement of a mesh has been suggested to prevent parastomal hernia. Evidence to support this practice is contradictory.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether funnel-shaped permanent synthetic parastomal mesh is effective and safe in parastomal hernia prevention.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Chimney Trial was a randomized single-blinded multicenter trial conducted in 4 hospitals in Finland and 1 in Sweden from February 2019 and September 2021. Of 439 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection or the Hartmann procedure, 143 were enrolled in the trial, 135 received their allocated intervention, and 121 were analyzed at 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to May 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In the intervention group, a permanent colostomy was created with a funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh and compared to a control group with a stoma without the mesh.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measure: </strong>The primary end point was the incidence of computed tomography (CT)-confirmed parastomal hernia 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 68 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [11.6] years; 36 [53% male and 32 [47%] female) who received the intended allocation in the mesh group and 67 (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [11.7] years; 48 [72%] male and 19 [28%] female) who received the intended allocation in the control group. CT scans were available for 58 patients in the mesh group and 59 patients in the control group at the 12-month follow-up. CT scans confirmed parastomal hernia in 6 of 58 patients (10%) in the mesh group compared to 22 of 59 patients (37%) in the control group (difference, 27%; 95% CI, 12-41; P < .001). Clinical parastomal hernia as a secondary outcome was recorded in 1 of 60 patients (2%) in the mesh group compared to 27 of 61 (43%) in the control group (difference, 41%; 95% CI, 29-55; P < .001). The number of patients with Clavien-Dindo class II ileus was 23 (35%) in the mesh group compared to 11 (17%) in the control group (difference, 18%; 95% CI, 3-32; P = .006). Only slight differences between the groups were detected in other stoma-related complications, readmissions, operative time, surgical site infections, reoperations, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, funnel-shaped parastomal mesh prevented a significant number of parastomal hernias without predisposing patients to mesh- or stoma-related complications during 12-month follow-up. The results of this study suggest the funnel-shaped mesh is a feasible option to prevent parastomal hernia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799939.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1244-1250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11359091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:有人建议通过预防性放置网片来预防腹膜旁疝。支持这种做法的证据相互矛盾:确定漏斗状永久性人造腹膜旁网片在预防腹膜旁疝方面是否有效、安全:烟囱试验是一项随机单盲多中心试验,于 2019 年 2 月至 2021 年 9 月在芬兰的 4 家医院和瑞典的 1 家医院进行。在接受腹腔镜或机器人辅助腹腔镜切除术或哈特曼手术的439名直肠腺癌患者中,143人被纳入试验,135人接受了分配的干预,121人接受了12个月的随访分析。数据分析时间为2023年12月至2024年5月:干预组使用漏斗状腹腔内网片建立永久性结肠造口,并与未使用网片的造口对照组进行比较。主要结果和测量指标:主要终点是术后12个月经计算机断层扫描(CT)证实的腹膜旁疝的发生率:网片组有 68 名患者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 68.7 [11.6] 岁;36 [53%] 名男性和 32 [47%] 名女性)接受了预期分配,对照组有 67 名患者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 66.4 [11.7] 岁;48 [72%] 名男性和 19 [28%] 名女性)接受了预期分配。在 12 个月的随访中,58 名网片组患者和 59 名对照组患者接受了 CT 扫描。网片组 58 名患者中有 6 人(10%)通过 CT 扫描证实患有腹膜旁疝,而对照组 59 名患者中有 22 人(37%)通过 CT 扫描证实患有腹膜旁疝(差异为 27%;95% CI,12-41;P 结论及意义:在这项研究中,漏斗状腹膜旁网片可预防大量的腹膜旁疝气,且在 12 个月的随访期间不会导致患者出现网片或造口相关并发症。该研究结果表明,漏斗状网片是预防腹股沟旁疝的可行方案:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03799939。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parastomal Hernia Prevention Using Funnel-Shaped Intra-Abdominal Mesh Compared to No Mesh: The Chimney Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Prophylactic placement of a mesh has been suggested to prevent parastomal hernia. Evidence to support this practice is contradictory.

Objective: To determine whether funnel-shaped permanent synthetic parastomal mesh is effective and safe in parastomal hernia prevention.

Design, setting, and participants: The Chimney Trial was a randomized single-blinded multicenter trial conducted in 4 hospitals in Finland and 1 in Sweden from February 2019 and September 2021. Of 439 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection or the Hartmann procedure, 143 were enrolled in the trial, 135 received their allocated intervention, and 121 were analyzed at 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to May 2024.

Intervention: In the intervention group, a permanent colostomy was created with a funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh and compared to a control group with a stoma without the mesh.

Main outcome and measure: The primary end point was the incidence of computed tomography (CT)-confirmed parastomal hernia 12 months after surgery.

Results: There were 68 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [11.6] years; 36 [53% male and 32 [47%] female) who received the intended allocation in the mesh group and 67 (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [11.7] years; 48 [72%] male and 19 [28%] female) who received the intended allocation in the control group. CT scans were available for 58 patients in the mesh group and 59 patients in the control group at the 12-month follow-up. CT scans confirmed parastomal hernia in 6 of 58 patients (10%) in the mesh group compared to 22 of 59 patients (37%) in the control group (difference, 27%; 95% CI, 12-41; P < .001). Clinical parastomal hernia as a secondary outcome was recorded in 1 of 60 patients (2%) in the mesh group compared to 27 of 61 (43%) in the control group (difference, 41%; 95% CI, 29-55; P < .001). The number of patients with Clavien-Dindo class II ileus was 23 (35%) in the mesh group compared to 11 (17%) in the control group (difference, 18%; 95% CI, 3-32; P = .006). Only slight differences between the groups were detected in other stoma-related complications, readmissions, operative time, surgical site infections, reoperations, and quality of life.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, funnel-shaped parastomal mesh prevented a significant number of parastomal hernias without predisposing patients to mesh- or stoma-related complications during 12-month follow-up. The results of this study suggest the funnel-shaped mesh is a feasible option to prevent parastomal hernia.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799939.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信