为蜂王人工授精的雄蜂数量对蜜蜂育种计划的优化几乎没有影响。

IF 2.7 3区 生物学
Manuel Du, Richard Bernstein, Andreas Hoppe
{"title":"为蜂王人工授精的雄蜂数量对蜜蜂育种计划的优化几乎没有影响。","authors":"Manuel Du, Richard Bernstein, Andreas Hoppe","doi":"10.1186/s41065-024-00332-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mating control is a crucial aspect of honeybee breeding. Instrumental insemination of queens gives the breeder maximum control over the genetic origin of the involved drones. However, in addition to the drones' descent, the breeder's control also extends over the number of drones to use for inseminations. Thus far, this aspect has largely been ignored in attempts to optimize honeybee breeding schemes. The literature provides some comparisons between single drone inseminations (SDI) and multi drone inseminations (MDI) but it is unclear whether the number of drones used in MDI is a relevant parameter for the optimization of honeybee breeding programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By computer simulations, we investigated the effect of the number of drones per inseminated queen in breeding programs that relied on best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) breeding values. We covered a range of 1 to 50 drones per queen and observed the developments of genetic gain and inbreeding over a period of 20 years. Hereby, we focused on insemination schemes that take the drones for one queen from a single colony.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SDI strategies led to 5.46% to 14.19% higher genetic gain than MDI at the cost of 6.1% to 30.2% higher inbreeding rates. The number of drones used in MDI settings had only a negligible impact on the results. There was a slight tendency that more drones lead to lower genetic gain and lower inbreeding rates but whenever more than five drones were used for inseminations, no significant differences could be observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The opportunities to optimize breeding schemes via the number of drones used in inseminations are very limited. SDI can be a viable strategy in situations where breeders are interested in genetically homogeneous offspring or precise pedigree information. However, such strategies have to account for the fact that the semen from a single drone is insufficient to fill a queen's spermatheca, whence SDI queens will not build full-strength colonies. When deciding for MDI, breeders should focus on collecting enough semen for a succesful insemination, regardless of how many drones they need for this purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":12862,"journal":{"name":"Hereditas","volume":"161 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The number of drones to inseminate a queen with has little potential for optimization of honeybee breeding programs.\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Du, Richard Bernstein, Andreas Hoppe\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41065-024-00332-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mating control is a crucial aspect of honeybee breeding. Instrumental insemination of queens gives the breeder maximum control over the genetic origin of the involved drones. However, in addition to the drones' descent, the breeder's control also extends over the number of drones to use for inseminations. Thus far, this aspect has largely been ignored in attempts to optimize honeybee breeding schemes. The literature provides some comparisons between single drone inseminations (SDI) and multi drone inseminations (MDI) but it is unclear whether the number of drones used in MDI is a relevant parameter for the optimization of honeybee breeding programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By computer simulations, we investigated the effect of the number of drones per inseminated queen in breeding programs that relied on best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) breeding values. We covered a range of 1 to 50 drones per queen and observed the developments of genetic gain and inbreeding over a period of 20 years. Hereby, we focused on insemination schemes that take the drones for one queen from a single colony.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SDI strategies led to 5.46% to 14.19% higher genetic gain than MDI at the cost of 6.1% to 30.2% higher inbreeding rates. The number of drones used in MDI settings had only a negligible impact on the results. There was a slight tendency that more drones lead to lower genetic gain and lower inbreeding rates but whenever more than five drones were used for inseminations, no significant differences could be observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The opportunities to optimize breeding schemes via the number of drones used in inseminations are very limited. SDI can be a viable strategy in situations where breeders are interested in genetically homogeneous offspring or precise pedigree information. However, such strategies have to account for the fact that the semen from a single drone is insufficient to fill a queen's spermatheca, whence SDI queens will not build full-strength colonies. When deciding for MDI, breeders should focus on collecting enough semen for a succesful insemination, regardless of how many drones they need for this purpose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hereditas\",\"volume\":\"161 1\",\"pages\":\"28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348579/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hereditas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-024-00332-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hereditas","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-024-00332-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:交配控制是蜜蜂育种的一个重要方面。对蜂王进行人工授精可使育种者最大程度地控制参与授精的雄蜂的基因来源。然而,除了无人蜂的血统外,育种者还可以控制用于人工授精的无人蜂数量。迄今为止,在试图优化蜜蜂育种方案时,这方面的问题在很大程度上被忽视了。文献提供了一些单蜂授精(SDI)和多蜂授精(MDI)的比较,但还不清楚多蜂授精中使用的无人机数量是否是蜜蜂繁殖计划优化的相关参数:通过计算机模拟,我们研究了在依赖最佳线性无偏预测(BLUP)育种值的育种计划中,每只授精蜂王的无人机数量的影响。我们研究了每只王后授精 1 到 50 只无人驾驶飞机的范围,并观察了 20 年间遗传增益和近亲繁殖的发展情况。因此,我们重点研究了从单个蜂群中为一个蜂王提取雄蜂的人工授精方案:结果:SDI策略的遗传增益比MDI高出5.46%到14.19%,但近交率却高出6.1%到30.2%。在 MDI 环境中使用的无人机数量对结果的影响微乎其微。无人机数量越多,遗传增益越低,近交率也越低:通过人工授精使用的无人机数量来优化育种方案的机会非常有限。在育种者希望后代基因一致或获得精确血统信息的情况下,SDI 不失为一种可行的策略。然而,这种策略必须考虑到一个事实,即来自单个无人机的精液不足以填满蜂王的精巢,因此 SDI 蜂王不会建立完全强壮的蜂群。在决定进行人工授精时,育种者应集中精力收集足够的精液,以便成功授精,而不管为此需要多少只无人机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The number of drones to inseminate a queen with has little potential for optimization of honeybee breeding programs.

Background: Mating control is a crucial aspect of honeybee breeding. Instrumental insemination of queens gives the breeder maximum control over the genetic origin of the involved drones. However, in addition to the drones' descent, the breeder's control also extends over the number of drones to use for inseminations. Thus far, this aspect has largely been ignored in attempts to optimize honeybee breeding schemes. The literature provides some comparisons between single drone inseminations (SDI) and multi drone inseminations (MDI) but it is unclear whether the number of drones used in MDI is a relevant parameter for the optimization of honeybee breeding programs.

Methods: By computer simulations, we investigated the effect of the number of drones per inseminated queen in breeding programs that relied on best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) breeding values. We covered a range of 1 to 50 drones per queen and observed the developments of genetic gain and inbreeding over a period of 20 years. Hereby, we focused on insemination schemes that take the drones for one queen from a single colony.

Results: SDI strategies led to 5.46% to 14.19% higher genetic gain than MDI at the cost of 6.1% to 30.2% higher inbreeding rates. The number of drones used in MDI settings had only a negligible impact on the results. There was a slight tendency that more drones lead to lower genetic gain and lower inbreeding rates but whenever more than five drones were used for inseminations, no significant differences could be observed.

Conclusion: The opportunities to optimize breeding schemes via the number of drones used in inseminations are very limited. SDI can be a viable strategy in situations where breeders are interested in genetically homogeneous offspring or precise pedigree information. However, such strategies have to account for the fact that the semen from a single drone is insufficient to fill a queen's spermatheca, whence SDI queens will not build full-strength colonies. When deciding for MDI, breeders should focus on collecting enough semen for a succesful insemination, regardless of how many drones they need for this purpose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hereditas
Hereditas Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For almost a century, Hereditas has published original cutting-edge research and reviews. As the Official journal of the Mendelian Society of Lund, the journal welcomes research from across all areas of genetics and genomics. Topics of interest include human and medical genetics, animal and plant genetics, microbial genetics, agriculture and bioinformatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信