使用 Rlep 基因靶标对麻风病人尿液样本中的麻风分枝杆菌 DNA 进行 qPCR 检测。

IF 3.9 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences Pub Date : 2024-08-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmolb.2024.1435679
D Diana, M C Harish
{"title":"使用 Rlep 基因靶标对麻风病人尿液样本中的麻风分枝杆菌 DNA 进行 qPCR 检测。","authors":"D Diana, M C Harish","doi":"10.3389/fmolb.2024.1435679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leprosy, a chronic infectious disease caused by <i>Mycobacterium leprae</i>, continues to pose a public health challenge in many parts of the world. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment and prevention of disabilities associated with the disease. Molecular techniques such as PCR have demonstrated great potential as a diagnostic tool for directly detecting <i>M. leprae</i> DNA in different clinical samples, providing better sensitivity and specificity than conventional diagnostic techniques. The objective of this study was to measure the amount of <i>M. leprae</i> DNA in leprosy patients' urine samples using the <i>Rlep</i> gene target through qPCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Different clinical samples such as smear, blood, and urine samples were collected from leprosy patients and healthy individuals. Leprosy patients were classified by the Ridley-Jopling classification. The Ziehl-Neelsen staining method was used for the slit skin smear (SSS) samples, and the bacteriological index (BI) was calculated for leprosy patients. DNA extraction and qPCR were performed for all three types of clinical samples using the <i>Rlep</i> gene target.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The <i>Mycobacterial leprae</i> DNA was successfully detected and quantified in all clinical samples across all types of leprosy among all the study groups using the <i>Rlep</i> gene (129 bp) target. The <i>Rlep</i> gene target was able to detect the presence of <i>M. leprae</i> DNA in 100% of urine, 96.1% of blood, and 92.2% of SSS samples of leprosy patients. Urine samples showed significant differences (p < 0.001) between the control and the different clinical forms and between borderline tuberculoid (BT) and pure neuritic leprosy (PNL) cases. There are significant differences in cycle threshold (Ct) values between control cases and clinical categories (p < 0.001), as well as specific differences within clinical categories (p < 0.001), reflecting the variability in bacterial load and detection sensitivity across different sample types and clinical manifestations of leprosy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, this study's findings suggest that the qPCR technique can be used to detect <i>M. leprae</i> DNA in urine samples of leprosy patients using the <i>Rlep</i> gene target. It can also be used for diagnosing the disease and monitoring the effectiveness of anti-leprosy drugs, including multi-drug therapy (MDT), across various leprosy disease groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":12465,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences","volume":"11 ","pages":"1435679"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"qPCR detection of <i>Mycobacterium leprae</i> DNA in urine samples of leprosy patients using the <i>Rlep</i> gene target.\",\"authors\":\"D Diana, M C Harish\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmolb.2024.1435679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leprosy, a chronic infectious disease caused by <i>Mycobacterium leprae</i>, continues to pose a public health challenge in many parts of the world. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment and prevention of disabilities associated with the disease. Molecular techniques such as PCR have demonstrated great potential as a diagnostic tool for directly detecting <i>M. leprae</i> DNA in different clinical samples, providing better sensitivity and specificity than conventional diagnostic techniques. The objective of this study was to measure the amount of <i>M. leprae</i> DNA in leprosy patients' urine samples using the <i>Rlep</i> gene target through qPCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Different clinical samples such as smear, blood, and urine samples were collected from leprosy patients and healthy individuals. Leprosy patients were classified by the Ridley-Jopling classification. The Ziehl-Neelsen staining method was used for the slit skin smear (SSS) samples, and the bacteriological index (BI) was calculated for leprosy patients. DNA extraction and qPCR were performed for all three types of clinical samples using the <i>Rlep</i> gene target.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The <i>Mycobacterial leprae</i> DNA was successfully detected and quantified in all clinical samples across all types of leprosy among all the study groups using the <i>Rlep</i> gene (129 bp) target. The <i>Rlep</i> gene target was able to detect the presence of <i>M. leprae</i> DNA in 100% of urine, 96.1% of blood, and 92.2% of SSS samples of leprosy patients. Urine samples showed significant differences (p < 0.001) between the control and the different clinical forms and between borderline tuberculoid (BT) and pure neuritic leprosy (PNL) cases. There are significant differences in cycle threshold (Ct) values between control cases and clinical categories (p < 0.001), as well as specific differences within clinical categories (p < 0.001), reflecting the variability in bacterial load and detection sensitivity across different sample types and clinical manifestations of leprosy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, this study's findings suggest that the qPCR technique can be used to detect <i>M. leprae</i> DNA in urine samples of leprosy patients using the <i>Rlep</i> gene target. It can also be used for diagnosing the disease and monitoring the effectiveness of anti-leprosy drugs, including multi-drug therapy (MDT), across various leprosy disease groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1435679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347395/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2024.1435679\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2024.1435679","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:麻风病是一种由麻风分枝杆菌引起的慢性传染病,在世界许多地区仍然是一项公共卫生挑战。早期准确的诊断对于有效治疗和预防麻风病导致的残疾至关重要。分子技术(如 PCR)作为直接检测不同临床样本中麻风杆菌 DNA 的诊断工具已显示出巨大的潜力,其灵敏度和特异性均优于传统诊断技术。本研究的目的是通过 qPCR,以 Rlep 基因为靶标,检测麻风病人尿液样本中麻风杆菌 DNA 的含量:方法:收集麻风病人和健康人的不同临床样本,如涂片、血液和尿液样本。麻风病人按 Ridley-Jopling 分类法进行分类。对裂隙皮肤涂片(SSS)样本采用齐氏-奈尔森染色法,并计算麻风病人的细菌学指数(BI)。使用 Rlep 基因靶标对所有三种临床样本进行了 DNA 提取和 qPCR 分析:结果:使用 Rlep 基因(129 bp)靶标,在所有研究组的所有麻风类型临床样本中都成功检测到了麻风分枝杆菌 DNA 并对其进行了定量。Rlep基因靶标能检测出100%的麻风病人尿液样本、96.1%的麻风病人血液样本和92.2%的麻风病人SSS样本中存在的麻风杆菌DNA。尿液样本在对照组和不同临床类型之间,以及在边缘型类结核病(BT)和纯神经性麻风病(PNL)病例之间存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。对照病例和临床类别之间的周期阈值(Ct)存在明显差异(p < 0.001),临床类别内部也存在特定差异(p < 0.001),这反映了不同样本类型和麻风病临床表现在细菌负荷和检测灵敏度方面的差异:总之,本研究结果表明,qPCR 技术可用于检测麻风病人尿液样本中以 Rlep 基因为靶点的麻风杆菌 DNA。该技术还可用于诊断麻风病和监测抗麻风病药物(包括多种药物疗法(MDT))在不同麻风病群中的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
qPCR detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in urine samples of leprosy patients using the Rlep gene target.

Background: Leprosy, a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae, continues to pose a public health challenge in many parts of the world. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment and prevention of disabilities associated with the disease. Molecular techniques such as PCR have demonstrated great potential as a diagnostic tool for directly detecting M. leprae DNA in different clinical samples, providing better sensitivity and specificity than conventional diagnostic techniques. The objective of this study was to measure the amount of M. leprae DNA in leprosy patients' urine samples using the Rlep gene target through qPCR.

Methods: Different clinical samples such as smear, blood, and urine samples were collected from leprosy patients and healthy individuals. Leprosy patients were classified by the Ridley-Jopling classification. The Ziehl-Neelsen staining method was used for the slit skin smear (SSS) samples, and the bacteriological index (BI) was calculated for leprosy patients. DNA extraction and qPCR were performed for all three types of clinical samples using the Rlep gene target.

Results: The Mycobacterial leprae DNA was successfully detected and quantified in all clinical samples across all types of leprosy among all the study groups using the Rlep gene (129 bp) target. The Rlep gene target was able to detect the presence of M. leprae DNA in 100% of urine, 96.1% of blood, and 92.2% of SSS samples of leprosy patients. Urine samples showed significant differences (p < 0.001) between the control and the different clinical forms and between borderline tuberculoid (BT) and pure neuritic leprosy (PNL) cases. There are significant differences in cycle threshold (Ct) values between control cases and clinical categories (p < 0.001), as well as specific differences within clinical categories (p < 0.001), reflecting the variability in bacterial load and detection sensitivity across different sample types and clinical manifestations of leprosy.

Conclusion: Overall, this study's findings suggest that the qPCR technique can be used to detect M. leprae DNA in urine samples of leprosy patients using the Rlep gene target. It can also be used for diagnosing the disease and monitoring the effectiveness of anti-leprosy drugs, including multi-drug therapy (MDT), across various leprosy disease groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1361
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Much of contemporary investigation in the life sciences is devoted to the molecular-scale understanding of the relationships between genes and the environment — in particular, dynamic alterations in the levels, modifications, and interactions of cellular effectors, including proteins. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences offers an international publication platform for basic as well as applied research; we encourage contributions spanning both established and emerging areas of biology. To this end, the journal draws from empirical disciplines such as structural biology, enzymology, biochemistry, and biophysics, capitalizing as well on the technological advancements that have enabled metabolomics and proteomics measurements in massively parallel throughput, and the development of robust and innovative computational biology strategies. We also recognize influences from medicine and technology, welcoming studies in molecular genetics, molecular diagnostics and therapeutics, and nanotechnology. Our ultimate objective is the comprehensive illustration of the molecular mechanisms regulating proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, lipids, and small metabolites in organisms across all branches of life. In addition to interesting new findings, techniques, and applications, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences will consider new testable hypotheses to inspire different perspectives and stimulate scientific dialogue. The integration of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches will benefit endeavors across all domains of the life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信