Maria Francesca Sfondrini, Maurizio Pascadopoli, Paola Gandini, Lorenzo Preda, Domenico Sfondrini, Karin Bertino, Cinzia Rizzi, Andrea Scribante
{"title":"磁共振成像(MRI)后不同直径的多导固定矫治器:调查温度变化和粘结效果的体外研究。","authors":"Maria Francesca Sfondrini, Maurizio Pascadopoli, Paola Gandini, Lorenzo Preda, Domenico Sfondrini, Karin Bertino, Cinzia Rizzi, Andrea Scribante","doi":"10.3390/dj12080255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Orthodontists are often asked to remove fixed retainers before patients undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The present in vitro study was designed to analyze the heating and bonding efficacy of stainless steel multibraided fixed retainers after 1.5- and 3-tesla (T) MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 180 human mandibular incisors were used to create 45 specimens of four teeth each, divided into nine groups. Handmade multibraided fixed retainers of three different sizes, defined by the diameter of the initial wire used (0.008″, 0.010″ and 0.012″), were tested. Three groups underwent MRI at 1.5 T, another three groups underwent MRI at 3 T and the last three groups did not undergo MRI. Temperature was assessed before and after MRI. Shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were assessed after MRI for all groups. Data were statistically analyzed (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1.5 T exposure, no significant temperature increase from T0 to T1 was observed in any of the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Regarding the 3 T groups, a significant difference from T0 to T1 was found for all the groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Temperature changes were not clinically relevant, as they were less than 1 °C for all groups except for group 3 (ΔT0-T1: 1.18 ± 0.3 °C) and group 6 (ΔT0-T1: 1.12 ± 0.37 °C). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the temperature variations associated with different wire diameters (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant changes in SBS or ARI were found (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Since overheating was irrelevant and adhesion values did not change, the tested devices were concluded to be safe for MRI examinations at 1.5 T and 3 T.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multibraided Fixed Retainers with Different Diameters after Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): In Vitro Study Investigating Temperature Changes and Bonding Efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Francesca Sfondrini, Maurizio Pascadopoli, Paola Gandini, Lorenzo Preda, Domenico Sfondrini, Karin Bertino, Cinzia Rizzi, Andrea Scribante\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj12080255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Orthodontists are often asked to remove fixed retainers before patients undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The present in vitro study was designed to analyze the heating and bonding efficacy of stainless steel multibraided fixed retainers after 1.5- and 3-tesla (T) MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 180 human mandibular incisors were used to create 45 specimens of four teeth each, divided into nine groups. Handmade multibraided fixed retainers of three different sizes, defined by the diameter of the initial wire used (0.008″, 0.010″ and 0.012″), were tested. Three groups underwent MRI at 1.5 T, another three groups underwent MRI at 3 T and the last three groups did not undergo MRI. Temperature was assessed before and after MRI. Shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were assessed after MRI for all groups. Data were statistically analyzed (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1.5 T exposure, no significant temperature increase from T0 to T1 was observed in any of the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Regarding the 3 T groups, a significant difference from T0 to T1 was found for all the groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Temperature changes were not clinically relevant, as they were less than 1 °C for all groups except for group 3 (ΔT0-T1: 1.18 ± 0.3 °C) and group 6 (ΔT0-T1: 1.12 ± 0.37 °C). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the temperature variations associated with different wire diameters (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant changes in SBS or ARI were found (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Since overheating was irrelevant and adhesion values did not change, the tested devices were concluded to be safe for MRI examinations at 1.5 T and 3 T.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353005/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12080255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12080255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:正畸医生经常要求患者在接受磁共振成像(MRI)检查之前取下固定保持器。本体外研究旨在分析1.5和3特斯拉(T)磁共振成像后不锈钢多棱固定保持器的加热和粘结效果:共使用 180 颗人类下颌门牙制作了 45 个标本,每个标本包含 4 颗牙齿,分为 9 组。测试了三种不同尺寸的手工制作的多导固定保持器,这是由所使用的初始导线的直径(0.008″、0.010″和0.012″)决定的。三组在 1.5 T 下进行了核磁共振成像,另外三组在 3 T 下进行了核磁共振成像,最后三组没有进行核磁共振成像。在核磁共振成像前后对温度进行了评估。核磁共振成像后对所有组的剪切粘接强度(SBS)和粘接残余指数(ARI)进行了评估。对数据进行了统计分析(P < 0.05):结果:1.5 T 暴露后,各组从 T0 到 T1 均未观察到明显的温度升高(p > 0.05)。至于 3 T 组,所有组从 T0 到 T1 都有显著差异(p < 0.05)。除第 3 组(ΔT0-T1:1.18 ± 0.3 °C)和第 6 组(ΔT0-T1:1.12 ± 0.37 °C)外,其他各组的体温变化均小于 1 °C,因此与临床无关。此外,不同直径钢丝的温度变化无明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:SBS 和 ARI 没有明显变化(p > 0.05):临床意义:由于不存在过热现象,粘附值也未发生变化,因此认为测试设备在 1.5 T 和 3 T 磁共振成像检查中是安全的。
Multibraided Fixed Retainers with Different Diameters after Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): In Vitro Study Investigating Temperature Changes and Bonding Efficacy.
Objectives: Orthodontists are often asked to remove fixed retainers before patients undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The present in vitro study was designed to analyze the heating and bonding efficacy of stainless steel multibraided fixed retainers after 1.5- and 3-tesla (T) MRI.
Materials and methods: A total of 180 human mandibular incisors were used to create 45 specimens of four teeth each, divided into nine groups. Handmade multibraided fixed retainers of three different sizes, defined by the diameter of the initial wire used (0.008″, 0.010″ and 0.012″), were tested. Three groups underwent MRI at 1.5 T, another three groups underwent MRI at 3 T and the last three groups did not undergo MRI. Temperature was assessed before and after MRI. Shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were assessed after MRI for all groups. Data were statistically analyzed (p < 0.05).
Results: After 1.5 T exposure, no significant temperature increase from T0 to T1 was observed in any of the groups (p > 0.05). Regarding the 3 T groups, a significant difference from T0 to T1 was found for all the groups (p < 0.05). Temperature changes were not clinically relevant, as they were less than 1 °C for all groups except for group 3 (ΔT0-T1: 1.18 ± 0.3 °C) and group 6 (ΔT0-T1: 1.12 ± 0.37 °C). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the temperature variations associated with different wire diameters (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: No significant changes in SBS or ARI were found (p > 0.05).
Clinical significance: Since overheating was irrelevant and adhesion values did not change, the tested devices were concluded to be safe for MRI examinations at 1.5 T and 3 T.