根据 NPC-GPOH 试验对成年鼻咽癌患者进行多模式治疗--基于单中心经验的分析。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Martin Leu, Hanibal Bohnenberger, Manuel Guhlich, Markus Anton Schirmer, Yiannis Pilavakis, Hendrik Andreas Wolff, Stefan Rieken, Leif Hendrik Dröge
{"title":"根据 NPC-GPOH 试验对成年鼻咽癌患者进行多模式治疗--基于单中心经验的分析。","authors":"Martin Leu,&nbsp;Hanibal Bohnenberger,&nbsp;Manuel Guhlich,&nbsp;Markus Anton Schirmer,&nbsp;Yiannis Pilavakis,&nbsp;Hendrik Andreas Wolff,&nbsp;Stefan Rieken,&nbsp;Leif Hendrik Dröge","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.2111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The German NPC-GPOH trials introduced treatment including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiochemotherapy (RCT) and antiviral treatment in patients aged 25 years or younger with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). We conducted a retrospective study on outcomes of patients at the age of ≥26 years treated accordingly at our institution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Consecutive patients who received primary RCT for NPC were included. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate survival probabilities, and the Cox regression analysis was used to test for an influence of the variables on outcomes. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated via CTCAE criteria and LENT/SOMA criteria, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 30 patients were included. Diagnosis was made from 09/1994 to 11/2016. The median 5 year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRC) were 75%, 56%, 83%, and 85%, respectively. We found a negative impact on outcomes (<i>p</i> &lt; .05) in case of older age (OS), history of smoking (OS), and T4 stage/ UICC stage IV (DFS). WHO histologic type significantly influenced outcomes, with best outcomes for type III and worst outcomes for type I. The rates of acute and late toxicities were acceptable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We found excellent outcomes and good feasibility of the NPC-GPOH trials regimen in adult patients. Additionally, we identified patients with outcomes which need to be improved (smokers, histologic type I tumors) and with particularly excellent outcomes (histologic type III tumors). This stimulates further studies on treatment intensification or de-escalation aiming at reduced side effects with optimal tumor control in NPC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnr2.2111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal treatment according to the NPC-GPOH trials in adult patients with nasopharyngeal cancer—Analysis based on a single-center experience\",\"authors\":\"Martin Leu,&nbsp;Hanibal Bohnenberger,&nbsp;Manuel Guhlich,&nbsp;Markus Anton Schirmer,&nbsp;Yiannis Pilavakis,&nbsp;Hendrik Andreas Wolff,&nbsp;Stefan Rieken,&nbsp;Leif Hendrik Dröge\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnr2.2111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The German NPC-GPOH trials introduced treatment including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiochemotherapy (RCT) and antiviral treatment in patients aged 25 years or younger with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). We conducted a retrospective study on outcomes of patients at the age of ≥26 years treated accordingly at our institution.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Consecutive patients who received primary RCT for NPC were included. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate survival probabilities, and the Cox regression analysis was used to test for an influence of the variables on outcomes. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated via CTCAE criteria and LENT/SOMA criteria, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 30 patients were included. Diagnosis was made from 09/1994 to 11/2016. The median 5 year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRC) were 75%, 56%, 83%, and 85%, respectively. We found a negative impact on outcomes (<i>p</i> &lt; .05) in case of older age (OS), history of smoking (OS), and T4 stage/ UICC stage IV (DFS). WHO histologic type significantly influenced outcomes, with best outcomes for type III and worst outcomes for type I. The rates of acute and late toxicities were acceptable.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found excellent outcomes and good feasibility of the NPC-GPOH trials regimen in adult patients. Additionally, we identified patients with outcomes which need to be improved (smokers, histologic type I tumors) and with particularly excellent outcomes (histologic type III tumors). This stimulates further studies on treatment intensification or de-escalation aiming at reduced side effects with optimal tumor control in NPC.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnr2.2111\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.2111\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.2111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:德国 NPC-GPOH 试验为 25 岁或以下的鼻咽癌(NPC)患者引入了包括新辅助化疗、放射化学治疗(RCT)和抗病毒治疗在内的治疗方法。我们对本机构接受相应治疗的≥26岁患者的疗效进行了回顾性研究:方法:纳入接受鼻咽癌初治 RCT 的连续患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算生存概率,并采用 Cox 回归分析检验变量对疗效的影响。急性和晚期毒性分别按照CTCAE标准和LENT/SOMA标准进行评估:共纳入 30 名患者。确诊时间为 1994 年 9 月至 2016 年 11 月。中位5年总生存率(OS)、无病生存率(DFS)、癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和无局部复发生存率(LRC)分别为75%、56%、83%和85%。我们发现这对疗效有负面影响(P我们发现,NPC-GPOH 试验方案在成年患者中具有出色的疗效和良好的可行性。此外,我们还发现了一些疗效有待提高的患者(吸烟者、组织学 I 型肿瘤)和疗效特别好的患者(组织学 III 型肿瘤)。这促使我们进一步研究加强治疗或降低治疗强度,以减少副作用并达到最佳肿瘤控制效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multimodal treatment according to the NPC-GPOH trials in adult patients with nasopharyngeal cancer—Analysis based on a single-center experience

Multimodal treatment according to the NPC-GPOH trials in adult patients with nasopharyngeal cancer—Analysis based on a single-center experience

Background and Aim

The German NPC-GPOH trials introduced treatment including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiochemotherapy (RCT) and antiviral treatment in patients aged 25 years or younger with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). We conducted a retrospective study on outcomes of patients at the age of ≥26 years treated accordingly at our institution.

Methods

Consecutive patients who received primary RCT for NPC were included. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate survival probabilities, and the Cox regression analysis was used to test for an influence of the variables on outcomes. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated via CTCAE criteria and LENT/SOMA criteria, respectively.

Results

In total, 30 patients were included. Diagnosis was made from 09/1994 to 11/2016. The median 5 year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRC) were 75%, 56%, 83%, and 85%, respectively. We found a negative impact on outcomes (p < .05) in case of older age (OS), history of smoking (OS), and T4 stage/ UICC stage IV (DFS). WHO histologic type significantly influenced outcomes, with best outcomes for type III and worst outcomes for type I. The rates of acute and late toxicities were acceptable.

Conclusion

We found excellent outcomes and good feasibility of the NPC-GPOH trials regimen in adult patients. Additionally, we identified patients with outcomes which need to be improved (smokers, histologic type I tumors) and with particularly excellent outcomes (histologic type III tumors). This stimulates further studies on treatment intensification or de-escalation aiming at reduced side effects with optimal tumor control in NPC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信