Fabiana Duarte, Inês Ricardo, Clarissa Faria, Pedro Alves da Silva, Nelson Cunha, Sandra Miguel, Rita Pinto, Fausto Pinto, Ana Abreu
{"title":"以运动为基础的心脏康复计划对心肺测试参数的影响。","authors":"Fabiana Duarte, Inês Ricardo, Clarissa Faria, Pedro Alves da Silva, Nelson Cunha, Sandra Miguel, Rita Pinto, Fausto Pinto, Ana Abreu","doi":"10.1159/000541011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRPs) represent a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach tailored to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and overall health-related quality of life, while reducing cardiovascular hospitalizations and mortality. Our aim was to determine changes in exercise capacity and cardiac events according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following a CRP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center cohort study included 131 patients who completed a center-based CRP from 2015 to 2022. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), transthoracic echocardiography, and laboratory analysis were performed before and after program completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 232 enrolled patients, 131 were included in our cohort analysis, with 36.6% having a reduced LVEF. These patients exhibited higher rates of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.019) and NT-proBNP values (p < 0.001). Patients with reduced LVEF had lower peak VO2 (pVO2) (p = 0.046), percentage of predicted oxygen consumption (ppVO2) (p < 0.001), and VO2 at anaerobic threshold (p = 0.015) during baseline CPET. Completion of the CRP led to comparable improvements in exercise performance between groups, assessed through Δ pVO2 (p = 0.990), Δ ppVO2 (p = 0.610), and Δ VE/VCO2 slope (p = 0.200). In the study population, male gender and hypertension independently predicted variation in VE/VCO2 slope (p = 0.017) and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (p = 0.048), respectively, post-CRP. During follow-up, 9.2% of all patients had hospital admissions for cardiac events, and 3.8% died, with no significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with reduced LVEF admitted to our CRP showed lower functional status based on specific CPET parameters. After CRP, both reduced and preserved LVEF groups experienced similar functional improvements. Therefore, strategies to increase participation of patients with reduced LVEF in such programs are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of an Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program on Cardiopulmonary Test Parameters.\",\"authors\":\"Fabiana Duarte, Inês Ricardo, Clarissa Faria, Pedro Alves da Silva, Nelson Cunha, Sandra Miguel, Rita Pinto, Fausto Pinto, Ana Abreu\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRPs) represent a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach tailored to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and overall health-related quality of life, while reducing cardiovascular hospitalizations and mortality. Our aim was to determine changes in exercise capacity and cardiac events according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following a CRP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center cohort study included 131 patients who completed a center-based CRP from 2015 to 2022. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), transthoracic echocardiography, and laboratory analysis were performed before and after program completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 232 enrolled patients, 131 were included in our cohort analysis, with 36.6% having a reduced LVEF. These patients exhibited higher rates of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.019) and NT-proBNP values (p < 0.001). Patients with reduced LVEF had lower peak VO2 (pVO2) (p = 0.046), percentage of predicted oxygen consumption (ppVO2) (p < 0.001), and VO2 at anaerobic threshold (p = 0.015) during baseline CPET. Completion of the CRP led to comparable improvements in exercise performance between groups, assessed through Δ pVO2 (p = 0.990), Δ ppVO2 (p = 0.610), and Δ VE/VCO2 slope (p = 0.200). In the study population, male gender and hypertension independently predicted variation in VE/VCO2 slope (p = 0.017) and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (p = 0.048), respectively, post-CRP. During follow-up, 9.2% of all patients had hospital admissions for cardiac events, and 3.8% died, with no significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with reduced LVEF admitted to our CRP showed lower functional status based on specific CPET parameters. After CRP, both reduced and preserved LVEF groups experienced similar functional improvements. Therefore, strategies to increase participation of patients with reduced LVEF in such programs are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of an Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program on Cardiopulmonary Test Parameters.
Introduction: Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRPs) represent a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach tailored to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and overall health-related quality of life, while reducing cardiovascular hospitalizations and mortality. Our aim was to determine changes in exercise capacity and cardiac events according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following a CRP.
Methods: This single-center cohort study included 131 patients who completed a center-based CRP from 2015 to 2022. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), transthoracic echocardiography, and laboratory analysis were performed before and after program completion.
Results: Of 232 enrolled patients, 131 were included in our cohort analysis, with 36.6% having a reduced LVEF. These patients exhibited higher rates of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.019) and NT-proBNP values (p < 0.001). Patients with reduced LVEF had lower peak VO2 (pVO2) (p = 0.046), percentage of predicted oxygen consumption (ppVO2) (p < 0.001), and VO2 at anaerobic threshold (p = 0.015) during baseline CPET. Completion of the CRP led to comparable improvements in exercise performance between groups, assessed through Δ pVO2 (p = 0.990), Δ ppVO2 (p = 0.610), and Δ VE/VCO2 slope (p = 0.200). In the study population, male gender and hypertension independently predicted variation in VE/VCO2 slope (p = 0.017) and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (p = 0.048), respectively, post-CRP. During follow-up, 9.2% of all patients had hospital admissions for cardiac events, and 3.8% died, with no significant differences between groups.
Conclusion: Patients with reduced LVEF admitted to our CRP showed lower functional status based on specific CPET parameters. After CRP, both reduced and preserved LVEF groups experienced similar functional improvements. Therefore, strategies to increase participation of patients with reduced LVEF in such programs are warranted.
期刊介绍:
''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.