极端保守主义者的制度合理性降低的进一步证据以及民族民粹主义的作用

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Luca Caricati, Francesca Rossi
{"title":"极端保守主义者的制度合理性降低的进一步证据以及民族民粹主义的作用","authors":"Luca Caricati,&nbsp;Francesca Rossi","doi":"10.1002/casp.2882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article replicates and extends previous results indicating that system justification, in a pool of non-American samples, decreases at the extremes of the political continuum. Data came from 29 European countries enrolled in nine rounds of the European Social Survey from 2002 to 2018. Results indicated that right-wingers were more likely to support the existing social system than left-wingers. However, a significant and negative quadratic effect emerged indicating that system justification decreased among extremists in both left and right-leaning poles. Findings also revealed that the level of national populist voting moderated the relationship between political orientation and system justification so that the difference between extreme leftists and extreme rightists was further reduced when national populist voting was higher. Results seem to confirm that extremists can be critical of the existing social system and that this trend is affected by the level of the rise in populism in those countries. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Further evidence that system justification decreases among extreme conservatives and the role of national populism\",\"authors\":\"Luca Caricati,&nbsp;Francesca Rossi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/casp.2882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article replicates and extends previous results indicating that system justification, in a pool of non-American samples, decreases at the extremes of the political continuum. Data came from 29 European countries enrolled in nine rounds of the European Social Survey from 2002 to 2018. Results indicated that right-wingers were more likely to support the existing social system than left-wingers. However, a significant and negative quadratic effect emerged indicating that system justification decreased among extremists in both left and right-leaning poles. Findings also revealed that the level of national populist voting moderated the relationship between political orientation and system justification so that the difference between extreme leftists and extreme rightists was further reduced when national populist voting was higher. Results seem to confirm that extremists can be critical of the existing social system and that this trend is affected by the level of the rise in populism in those countries. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.2882\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.2882","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章复制并扩展了之前的研究结果,表明在非美国样本库中,制度合理性在政治连续体的极端情况下会降低。数据来自 29 个欧洲国家,这些国家参加了 2002 年至 2018 年的九轮欧洲社会调查。结果显示,右翼人士比左翼人士更有可能支持现有的社会制度。然而,出现了一个显著的负二次方效应,表明在左翼和右翼两极的极端分子中,制度的合理性都有所下降。研究结果还显示,国家民粹主义投票水平缓和了政治倾向与制度合理性之间的关系,因此,当国家民粹主义投票水平较高时,极端左翼分子与极端右翼分子之间的差异会进一步缩小。研究结果似乎证实,极端主义者可以对现有社会制度提出批评,而且这种趋势会受到这些国家民粹主义兴起程度的影响。请参阅 "补充材料 "部分,查看本文的 "社区和社会影响声明"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Further evidence that system justification decreases among extreme conservatives and the role of national populism

This article replicates and extends previous results indicating that system justification, in a pool of non-American samples, decreases at the extremes of the political continuum. Data came from 29 European countries enrolled in nine rounds of the European Social Survey from 2002 to 2018. Results indicated that right-wingers were more likely to support the existing social system than left-wingers. However, a significant and negative quadratic effect emerged indicating that system justification decreased among extremists in both left and right-leaning poles. Findings also revealed that the level of national populist voting moderated the relationship between political orientation and system justification so that the difference between extreme leftists and extreme rightists was further reduced when national populist voting was higher. Results seem to confirm that extremists can be critical of the existing social system and that this trend is affected by the level of the rise in populism in those countries. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology publishes papers regarding social behaviour in relation to community problems and strengths. The journal is international in scope, reflecting the common concerns of scholars and community practitioners in Europe and worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信