Sijun Wu , Lin Wang , Youling Qian , Linqi Mei , Maolin Zhang
{"title":"体力活动与膳食炎症指数之间的相互作用和联合效应是否会改变中风风险?","authors":"Sijun Wu , Lin Wang , Youling Qian , Linqi Mei , Maolin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Stroke is a major public health threat, and both physical activity (PA) and diet are modifiable risk factors for stroke. This study assessed the interaction and joint effects of PA and the dietary inflammatory index (DII) on stroke.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included 18,676 participants from the 2007–2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The independent associations, interactions, and joint effects of PA and the DII on stroke were assessed by weighted multivariable logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The weighted mean age of the participants was 48.24 years, and comprised 703 individuals who had experienced a stroke. After adjusting for confounders, increased stroke risk was independently associated with a higher DII (Q4, odds ratio [OR]: 1.72, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.27–2.34) and insufficient PA (inactive, OR: 1.37, 95 % CI: 1.05–1.78). No significant multiplicative (OR: 1.11, 95 % CI: 0.34–1.93) or additive (relative excess risk due to interaction: 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.35–1.25) interactions were found between DII and PA. The results of joint associations indicated that individuals who consumed the most pro-inflammatory diet (DII, Q4) and were physically inactive (OR: 2.39, 95 % CI: 1.61–3.56) had the highest stroke risk than those who consumed the most anti-inflammatory diet (DII, Q1) and were physically active.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Active PA and low DII scores are independent protective factors against stroke. Although the multiplicative and additive effects of the DII and PA on stroke risk are not statistically significant, the analysis of their joint effects suggest that individuals who consume anti-inflammatory diets and exhibit active PA consistently have the lowest risk of stroke.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do interaction and joint effects between physical activity and dietary inflammatory index modify stroke risk?\",\"authors\":\"Sijun Wu , Lin Wang , Youling Qian , Linqi Mei , Maolin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Stroke is a major public health threat, and both physical activity (PA) and diet are modifiable risk factors for stroke. This study assessed the interaction and joint effects of PA and the dietary inflammatory index (DII) on stroke.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included 18,676 participants from the 2007–2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The independent associations, interactions, and joint effects of PA and the DII on stroke were assessed by weighted multivariable logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The weighted mean age of the participants was 48.24 years, and comprised 703 individuals who had experienced a stroke. After adjusting for confounders, increased stroke risk was independently associated with a higher DII (Q4, odds ratio [OR]: 1.72, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.27–2.34) and insufficient PA (inactive, OR: 1.37, 95 % CI: 1.05–1.78). No significant multiplicative (OR: 1.11, 95 % CI: 0.34–1.93) or additive (relative excess risk due to interaction: 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.35–1.25) interactions were found between DII and PA. The results of joint associations indicated that individuals who consumed the most pro-inflammatory diet (DII, Q4) and were physically inactive (OR: 2.39, 95 % CI: 1.61–3.56) had the highest stroke risk than those who consumed the most anti-inflammatory diet (DII, Q1) and were physically active.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Active PA and low DII scores are independent protective factors against stroke. Although the multiplicative and additive effects of the DII and PA on stroke risk are not statistically significant, the analysis of their joint effects suggest that individuals who consume anti-inflammatory diets and exhibit active PA consistently have the lowest risk of stroke.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000719\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000719","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的中风是一种主要的公共健康威胁,而体力活动(PA)和饮食都是可改变的中风风险因素。本研究评估了体力活动和饮食炎症指数(DII)对脑卒中的交互作用和联合效应。方法我们纳入了 2007-2020 年全国健康与营养调查的 18,676 名参与者。结果参与者的加权平均年龄为 48.24 岁,包括 703 名经历过中风的人。在对混杂因素进行调整后,中风风险的增加与较高的 DII(Q4,几率比 [OR]:1.72,95 % 置信区间 [CI]:1.27-2.34)和 PA 不足(非活动,OR:1.37,95 % 置信区间 [CI]:1.05-1.78)独立相关。在 DII 和 PA 之间没有发现明显的乘法效应(OR:1.11,95 % CI:0.34-1.93)或加法效应(相互作用导致的相对超额风险:0.45,95 % CI:0.35-1.25)。联合关联的结果表明,摄入促炎饮食最多(DII,Q4)且缺乏运动的人(OR:2.39,95 % CI:1.61-3.56)比摄入抗炎饮食最多(DII,Q1)且缺乏运动的人中风风险最高。尽管 DII 和 PA 对中风风险的乘法效应和加法效应在统计学上并不显著,但对它们共同效应的分析表明,摄入抗炎饮食并表现出积极 PA 的个体始终具有最低的中风风险。
Do interaction and joint effects between physical activity and dietary inflammatory index modify stroke risk?
Objective
Stroke is a major public health threat, and both physical activity (PA) and diet are modifiable risk factors for stroke. This study assessed the interaction and joint effects of PA and the dietary inflammatory index (DII) on stroke.
Methods
We included 18,676 participants from the 2007–2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The independent associations, interactions, and joint effects of PA and the DII on stroke were assessed by weighted multivariable logistic regression.
Results
The weighted mean age of the participants was 48.24 years, and comprised 703 individuals who had experienced a stroke. After adjusting for confounders, increased stroke risk was independently associated with a higher DII (Q4, odds ratio [OR]: 1.72, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.27–2.34) and insufficient PA (inactive, OR: 1.37, 95 % CI: 1.05–1.78). No significant multiplicative (OR: 1.11, 95 % CI: 0.34–1.93) or additive (relative excess risk due to interaction: 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.35–1.25) interactions were found between DII and PA. The results of joint associations indicated that individuals who consumed the most pro-inflammatory diet (DII, Q4) and were physically inactive (OR: 2.39, 95 % CI: 1.61–3.56) had the highest stroke risk than those who consumed the most anti-inflammatory diet (DII, Q1) and were physically active.
Conclusion
Active PA and low DII scores are independent protective factors against stroke. Although the multiplicative and additive effects of the DII and PA on stroke risk are not statistically significant, the analysis of their joint effects suggest that individuals who consume anti-inflammatory diets and exhibit active PA consistently have the lowest risk of stroke.
期刊介绍:
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice.
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice.
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.