一种新型超高效超临界流体色谱-串联质谱法,用于分析反兴奋剂背景下的尿液内源性类固醇

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
{"title":"一种新型超高效超临界流体色谱-串联质谱法,用于分析反兴奋剂背景下的尿液内源性类固醇","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The first step in the detection of testosterone (T) doping is to measure the urinary steroid profile for the athlete biological passport (ABP). To harmonise the analysis between anti-doping laboratories, urinary steroid profiling is parametrised in deep detail and shall be performed by gas chromatography hyphenated to mass spectrometry (GC–MS). However, due to its requirement for extensive sample preparation, alternatives to GC–MS are being actively pursued. The aim of this study was the evaluation of Ultra-High-Performance Supercritical Fluid Chromatography hyphenated to tandem Mass Spectrometry (UHPSFC-MS/MS) as an alternative for the quantification of endogenous urinary steroids. In this context, we developed a high throughput sample extraction method, followed by a novel UHPSFC-MS/MS method for the analysis of 10 endogenous urinary steroids which are relevant for doping control analysis. Depending on the steroid, the herein presented method is capable of quantification from 0.5 ng/mL up to 10 µg/mL. After validation, the applicability of the method was evaluated by analysing 132 authentic urine samples, which demonstrated results similar to classical GC–MS analysis. Steroid concentrations determined by UHPSFC-MS/MS were slightly overestimated in comparison with GC–MS, but the ratios had &lt;10 % difference between the two methods. As the ABP considers the steroid ratios for passport evaluation, the herein presented method could be used for steroid profiling without reducing the sensitivity of the ABP. Thus, we would propose to consider UHPSFC-MS/MS as an alternative to GC–MS after more tests would have been performed to support our findings. Furthermore, we have also investigated the potential of this technology for sample purification prior to Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) for the differentiation between exogenous and endogenous origin of T and its metabolites. While the achieved separation was sufficient to purify urine samples for IRMS analysis in our proof-of-concept study, the instrumental parameters should be further refined for future use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967324005983/pdfft?md5=26f14cef50f65a6973e35cb25674c4ad&pid=1-s2.0-S0021967324005983-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel ultra-high-performance supercritical fluid chromatography hyphenated to tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of urinary endogenous steroids in the anti-doping context\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The first step in the detection of testosterone (T) doping is to measure the urinary steroid profile for the athlete biological passport (ABP). To harmonise the analysis between anti-doping laboratories, urinary steroid profiling is parametrised in deep detail and shall be performed by gas chromatography hyphenated to mass spectrometry (GC–MS). However, due to its requirement for extensive sample preparation, alternatives to GC–MS are being actively pursued. The aim of this study was the evaluation of Ultra-High-Performance Supercritical Fluid Chromatography hyphenated to tandem Mass Spectrometry (UHPSFC-MS/MS) as an alternative for the quantification of endogenous urinary steroids. In this context, we developed a high throughput sample extraction method, followed by a novel UHPSFC-MS/MS method for the analysis of 10 endogenous urinary steroids which are relevant for doping control analysis. Depending on the steroid, the herein presented method is capable of quantification from 0.5 ng/mL up to 10 µg/mL. After validation, the applicability of the method was evaluated by analysing 132 authentic urine samples, which demonstrated results similar to classical GC–MS analysis. Steroid concentrations determined by UHPSFC-MS/MS were slightly overestimated in comparison with GC–MS, but the ratios had &lt;10 % difference between the two methods. As the ABP considers the steroid ratios for passport evaluation, the herein presented method could be used for steroid profiling without reducing the sensitivity of the ABP. Thus, we would propose to consider UHPSFC-MS/MS as an alternative to GC–MS after more tests would have been performed to support our findings. Furthermore, we have also investigated the potential of this technology for sample purification prior to Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) for the differentiation between exogenous and endogenous origin of T and its metabolites. While the achieved separation was sufficient to purify urine samples for IRMS analysis in our proof-of-concept study, the instrumental parameters should be further refined for future use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chromatography A\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967324005983/pdfft?md5=26f14cef50f65a6973e35cb25674c4ad&pid=1-s2.0-S0021967324005983-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chromatography A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967324005983\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967324005983","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

检测睾酮(T)兴奋剂的第一步是为运动员生物护照(ABP)测量尿液类固醇谱。为了协调各反兴奋剂实验室之间的分析工作,对尿液类固醇分析作了详细的规定,并应采用气相色谱-质谱联用技术(GC-MS)。然而,由于气相色谱-质谱法需要大量的样品制备工作,因此人们正在积极寻找气相色谱-质谱法的替代方法。本研究旨在评估超高效超临界流体色谱-串联质谱法(UHPSFC-MS/MS)作为内源性尿液类固醇定量分析替代方法的效果。在此背景下,我们开发了一种高通量样品提取方法,并随后开发了一种新型 UHPSFC-MS/MS 方法,用于分析与兴奋剂控制分析相关的 10 种内源性尿液类固醇。根据类固醇的不同,该方法的定量范围从 0.5 纳克/毫升到 10 微克/毫升。经过验证后,通过分析 132 份真实尿样评估了该方法的适用性,结果与传统的气相色谱-质谱分析类似。与气相色谱-质谱法相比,UHPSFC-MS/MS 法测定的类固醇浓度略高,但两种方法的比率相差 10%。由于 ABP 在评估护照时会考虑类固醇比率,因此本文介绍的方法可用于类固醇分析,而不会降低 ABP 的灵敏度。因此,我们建议在进行更多测试以支持我们的研究结果后,考虑将 UHPSFC-MS/MS 作为 GC-MS 的替代方法。此外,我们还研究了该技术在同位素比质谱法(IRMS)之前进行样品纯化的潜力,以区分 T 及其代谢物的外源性和内源性来源。在我们的概念验证研究中,虽然所实现的分离足以纯化尿液样品用于 IRMS 分析,但仪器参数仍需进一步改进,以便将来使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel ultra-high-performance supercritical fluid chromatography hyphenated to tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of urinary endogenous steroids in the anti-doping context

The first step in the detection of testosterone (T) doping is to measure the urinary steroid profile for the athlete biological passport (ABP). To harmonise the analysis between anti-doping laboratories, urinary steroid profiling is parametrised in deep detail and shall be performed by gas chromatography hyphenated to mass spectrometry (GC–MS). However, due to its requirement for extensive sample preparation, alternatives to GC–MS are being actively pursued. The aim of this study was the evaluation of Ultra-High-Performance Supercritical Fluid Chromatography hyphenated to tandem Mass Spectrometry (UHPSFC-MS/MS) as an alternative for the quantification of endogenous urinary steroids. In this context, we developed a high throughput sample extraction method, followed by a novel UHPSFC-MS/MS method for the analysis of 10 endogenous urinary steroids which are relevant for doping control analysis. Depending on the steroid, the herein presented method is capable of quantification from 0.5 ng/mL up to 10 µg/mL. After validation, the applicability of the method was evaluated by analysing 132 authentic urine samples, which demonstrated results similar to classical GC–MS analysis. Steroid concentrations determined by UHPSFC-MS/MS were slightly overestimated in comparison with GC–MS, but the ratios had <10 % difference between the two methods. As the ABP considers the steroid ratios for passport evaluation, the herein presented method could be used for steroid profiling without reducing the sensitivity of the ABP. Thus, we would propose to consider UHPSFC-MS/MS as an alternative to GC–MS after more tests would have been performed to support our findings. Furthermore, we have also investigated the potential of this technology for sample purification prior to Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) for the differentiation between exogenous and endogenous origin of T and its metabolites. While the achieved separation was sufficient to purify urine samples for IRMS analysis in our proof-of-concept study, the instrumental parameters should be further refined for future use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal of Chromatography A 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
14.60%
发文量
742
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography A provides a forum for the publication of original research and critical reviews on all aspects of fundamental and applied separation science. The scope of the journal includes chromatography and related techniques, electromigration techniques (e.g. electrophoresis, electrochromatography), hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, sample preparation, and detection methods such as mass spectrometry. Contributions consist mainly of research papers dealing with the theory of separation methods, instrumental developments and analytical and preparative applications of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信