比较蚯蚓和藻类对不同压力的敏感性的荟萃分析

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Cécile Serbource , Lucas Petit-Dit-Grezeriat , Céline Pelosi
{"title":"比较蚯蚓和藻类对不同压力的敏感性的荟萃分析","authors":"Cécile Serbource ,&nbsp;Lucas Petit-Dit-Grezeriat ,&nbsp;Céline Pelosi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Earthworms and enchytraeids are soil organisms involved in key soil functions, such as organic matter turnover and soil structure, at different scales. In natural soils, these organisms are exposed and sensitive to different abiotic factors (e.g., climate, land use and management) and are often used as bioindicators of human disturbances, particularly chemical stress. However, the sensitivity of these two groups of Oligochaeta (Annelida) to different stressors has never been compared. Using data from 49 publications and 330 observations, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the sensitivities of earthworms and enchytraeids to all kinds of stressors under similar test conditions. Earthworms and enchytraeids were found to be equally sensitive to chemical stressors (mean effect size −0.61 [-2.53; 1.30]) regardless of the studied endpoint (mortality or reproduction). Most of the observations dealt with the effects of pesticides (42 %) and heavy metals (40 %) on both organisms. No difference in sensitivity was revealed when these two stressors were considered separately. Regarding the two most studied species of enchytraeids and earthworms, the mean effect sizes of all the possible combinations of <em>Eisenia fetida</em> (41 % of the studies) or <em>Eisenia andrei</em> (48 %) or <em>Enchytraeus crypticus</em> (73 % of the studies) or <em>Enchytraeus albidus</em> (27 %) did not reveal any differences in sensitivity. This study also highlights the lack of studies on environmentally relevant (i.e., representative of natural soils) enchytraeid and earthworm species. We also revealed that mostly ecotoxicologists have compared the sensitivities of these two key soil organisms when they are exposed to and threatened by other important factors, such as agricultural practices and climate change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103656"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis to compare the sensitivities of earthworms and enchytraeids to different stressors\",\"authors\":\"Cécile Serbource ,&nbsp;Lucas Petit-Dit-Grezeriat ,&nbsp;Céline Pelosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Earthworms and enchytraeids are soil organisms involved in key soil functions, such as organic matter turnover and soil structure, at different scales. In natural soils, these organisms are exposed and sensitive to different abiotic factors (e.g., climate, land use and management) and are often used as bioindicators of human disturbances, particularly chemical stress. However, the sensitivity of these two groups of Oligochaeta (Annelida) to different stressors has never been compared. Using data from 49 publications and 330 observations, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the sensitivities of earthworms and enchytraeids to all kinds of stressors under similar test conditions. Earthworms and enchytraeids were found to be equally sensitive to chemical stressors (mean effect size −0.61 [-2.53; 1.30]) regardless of the studied endpoint (mortality or reproduction). Most of the observations dealt with the effects of pesticides (42 %) and heavy metals (40 %) on both organisms. No difference in sensitivity was revealed when these two stressors were considered separately. Regarding the two most studied species of enchytraeids and earthworms, the mean effect sizes of all the possible combinations of <em>Eisenia fetida</em> (41 % of the studies) or <em>Eisenia andrei</em> (48 %) or <em>Enchytraeus crypticus</em> (73 % of the studies) or <em>Enchytraeus albidus</em> (27 %) did not reveal any differences in sensitivity. This study also highlights the lack of studies on environmentally relevant (i.e., representative of natural soils) enchytraeid and earthworm species. We also revealed that mostly ecotoxicologists have compared the sensitivities of these two key soil organisms when they are exposed to and threatened by other important factors, such as agricultural practices and climate change.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Biology\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556324000621\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556324000621","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蚯蚓和糠虾是一种土壤生物,在不同尺度上参与土壤的关键功能,如有机质转换和土壤结构。在自然土壤中,这些生物暴露于不同的非生物因素(如气候、土地利用和管理)并对其敏感,通常被用作人类干扰(尤其是化学压力)的生物指标。然而,这两类寡毛类(Annelida)对不同压力因素的敏感性从未进行过比较。我们利用 49 篇文献和 330 个观察结果中的数据进行了荟萃分析,比较了蚯蚓和虾蚯蚓在类似试验条件下对各种应激源的敏感性。结果发现,无论研究的终点是什么(死亡还是繁殖),蚯蚓和虾虎鱼对化学应激源的敏感性是相同的(平均效应大小为-0.61 [-2.53; 1.30])。大多数观察结果涉及农药(42%)和重金属(40%)对这两种生物的影响。如果将这两种压力因素分开考虑,则不会发现敏感性上的差异。关于研究最多的两种虾蚯蚓和蚯蚓,Eisenia fetida(占研究的 41%)或 Eisenia andrei(占研究的 48%)或 Enchytraeus crypticus(占研究的 73%)或 Enchytraeus albidus(占研究的 27%)的所有可能组合的平均效应大小并未显示出任何敏感性差异。这项研究还凸显出缺乏对环境相关(即代表自然土壤)的尾丝虫和蚯蚓物种的研究。我们还发现,大多数生态毒理学家都比较过这两种关键土壤生物在受到其他重要因素(如农业实践和气候变化)的影响和威胁时的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A meta-analysis to compare the sensitivities of earthworms and enchytraeids to different stressors

Earthworms and enchytraeids are soil organisms involved in key soil functions, such as organic matter turnover and soil structure, at different scales. In natural soils, these organisms are exposed and sensitive to different abiotic factors (e.g., climate, land use and management) and are often used as bioindicators of human disturbances, particularly chemical stress. However, the sensitivity of these two groups of Oligochaeta (Annelida) to different stressors has never been compared. Using data from 49 publications and 330 observations, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the sensitivities of earthworms and enchytraeids to all kinds of stressors under similar test conditions. Earthworms and enchytraeids were found to be equally sensitive to chemical stressors (mean effect size −0.61 [-2.53; 1.30]) regardless of the studied endpoint (mortality or reproduction). Most of the observations dealt with the effects of pesticides (42 %) and heavy metals (40 %) on both organisms. No difference in sensitivity was revealed when these two stressors were considered separately. Regarding the two most studied species of enchytraeids and earthworms, the mean effect sizes of all the possible combinations of Eisenia fetida (41 % of the studies) or Eisenia andrei (48 %) or Enchytraeus crypticus (73 % of the studies) or Enchytraeus albidus (27 %) did not reveal any differences in sensitivity. This study also highlights the lack of studies on environmentally relevant (i.e., representative of natural soils) enchytraeid and earthworm species. We also revealed that mostly ecotoxicologists have compared the sensitivities of these two key soil organisms when they are exposed to and threatened by other important factors, such as agricultural practices and climate change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信