超声波在评估髂静脉支架植入术中的功效。

Phlebology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1177/02683555241276565
Hannah Clode, Elizabeth Brooke Spencer, Jacqueline Nelson, Elisabeth S Horne
{"title":"超声波在评估髂静脉支架植入术中的功效。","authors":"Hannah Clode, Elizabeth Brooke Spencer, Jacqueline Nelson, Elisabeth S Horne","doi":"10.1177/02683555241276565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The current study evaluated the efficacy of iliac and IVC ultrasound alone for follow-up evaluation of iliac vein stents in patients with pelvic venous disorders or iliac occlusion from chronic deep vein thrombosis. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective single site cohort study was conducted by evaluating the most recent 100 iliac vein and inferior vena cava ultrasounds in patients who had undergone iliac vein stenting. Inclusion criteria included a history of iliac vein stent placement. Exclusion criteria included patients under 18-years-old, duplicates of the same patient, and pregnancy at the time of ultrasound. The degree of visualization for color flow, gray scale, and phasicity were determined and classified into the following categories: complete, partial, or none. In addition, each chart was assessed for external compression, in-stent narrowing, and requirements for further imaging. <b>Results:</b> Of the 100 iliac vein and IVC ultrasounds assessed in this review, 99 of the ultrasounds were sufficient for evaluation during follow-up visits without requiring further investigation. Within this study cohort, the average follow-up time was 22 months. The average participant body mass index was 27.6. One iliac vein and IVC ultrasound was considered inadequate for follow-up evaluation and required further imaging. <b>Conclusion:</b> The use of iliac and IVC venous doppler ultrasound alone in the follow-up evaluation of iliac stent patency is effective and noninvasive and avoids unnecessary radiation exposure and cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"110-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of ultrasound in the evaluation of iliac vein stenting.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Clode, Elizabeth Brooke Spencer, Jacqueline Nelson, Elisabeth S Horne\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555241276565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The current study evaluated the efficacy of iliac and IVC ultrasound alone for follow-up evaluation of iliac vein stents in patients with pelvic venous disorders or iliac occlusion from chronic deep vein thrombosis. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective single site cohort study was conducted by evaluating the most recent 100 iliac vein and inferior vena cava ultrasounds in patients who had undergone iliac vein stenting. Inclusion criteria included a history of iliac vein stent placement. Exclusion criteria included patients under 18-years-old, duplicates of the same patient, and pregnancy at the time of ultrasound. The degree of visualization for color flow, gray scale, and phasicity were determined and classified into the following categories: complete, partial, or none. In addition, each chart was assessed for external compression, in-stent narrowing, and requirements for further imaging. <b>Results:</b> Of the 100 iliac vein and IVC ultrasounds assessed in this review, 99 of the ultrasounds were sufficient for evaluation during follow-up visits without requiring further investigation. Within this study cohort, the average follow-up time was 22 months. The average participant body mass index was 27.6. One iliac vein and IVC ultrasound was considered inadequate for follow-up evaluation and required further imaging. <b>Conclusion:</b> The use of iliac and IVC venous doppler ultrasound alone in the follow-up evaluation of iliac stent patency is effective and noninvasive and avoids unnecessary radiation exposure and cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110-115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241276565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241276565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究评估了单独使用髂静脉和 IVC 超声波对盆腔静脉疾病或慢性深静脉血栓引起的髂静脉闭塞患者的髂静脉支架进行随访评估的效果。方法:通过评估接受过髂静脉支架植入术的患者最近 100 次髂静脉和下腔静脉超声检查结果,进行了一项回顾性单点队列研究。纳入标准包括髂静脉支架置入史。排除标准包括未满 18 岁的患者、同一患者的重复患者以及超声检查时怀孕的患者。对彩色血流、灰度和相位的可视程度进行测定,并将其分为以下几类:完全、部分或无。此外,还对每张病历的外部压迫、支架内狭窄和进一步成像的要求进行了评估。结果:在本次审查评估的 100 例髂静脉和 IVC 超声波检查中,99 例超声波检查足以在随访时进行评估,无需进一步检查。在该研究队列中,平均随访时间为 22 个月。参与者的平均体重指数为 27.6。有一项髂静脉和 IVC 超声波检查被认为不足以进行随访评估,需要进行进一步的成像检查。结论仅使用髂静脉和 IVC 静脉多普勒超声来随访评估髂支架的通畅性是有效和无创的,并可避免不必要的辐射暴露和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of ultrasound in the evaluation of iliac vein stenting.

Objectives: The current study evaluated the efficacy of iliac and IVC ultrasound alone for follow-up evaluation of iliac vein stents in patients with pelvic venous disorders or iliac occlusion from chronic deep vein thrombosis. Methods: A retrospective single site cohort study was conducted by evaluating the most recent 100 iliac vein and inferior vena cava ultrasounds in patients who had undergone iliac vein stenting. Inclusion criteria included a history of iliac vein stent placement. Exclusion criteria included patients under 18-years-old, duplicates of the same patient, and pregnancy at the time of ultrasound. The degree of visualization for color flow, gray scale, and phasicity were determined and classified into the following categories: complete, partial, or none. In addition, each chart was assessed for external compression, in-stent narrowing, and requirements for further imaging. Results: Of the 100 iliac vein and IVC ultrasounds assessed in this review, 99 of the ultrasounds were sufficient for evaluation during follow-up visits without requiring further investigation. Within this study cohort, the average follow-up time was 22 months. The average participant body mass index was 27.6. One iliac vein and IVC ultrasound was considered inadequate for follow-up evaluation and required further imaging. Conclusion: The use of iliac and IVC venous doppler ultrasound alone in the follow-up evaluation of iliac stent patency is effective and noninvasive and avoids unnecessary radiation exposure and cost.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信