通过参与式、以证据为中心的设计,设计复杂合作的衡量标准。

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Pub Date : 2024-08-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frma.2024.1210547
Caitlin C Farrell, William R Penuel, Paula Arce-Trigatti, James Soland, Corinne Singleton, Alison Fox Resnick, Kristina Stamatis, Robbin Riedy, Erin Henrick, Stacey Sexton, Sarah Wellberg, Danny Schmidt
{"title":"通过参与式、以证据为中心的设计,设计复杂合作的衡量标准。","authors":"Caitlin C Farrell, William R Penuel, Paula Arce-Trigatti, James Soland, Corinne Singleton, Alison Fox Resnick, Kristina Stamatis, Robbin Riedy, Erin Henrick, Stacey Sexton, Sarah Wellberg, Danny Schmidt","doi":"10.3389/frma.2024.1210547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An increasingly popular form of collaboration involves forming partnerships among researchers, educators, and community members to improve or transform education systems through research inquiry. However, not all partnerships are successful. The field needs valid, reliable, and useful measures to help with assessing progress toward partnership goals. In this community case study, we present a participatory, mixed-methods approach for creating measures to assess the progress of education research-practice partnerships (RPPs). The case illustrates a novel approach to measurement design, driven by perspectives and feedback of over 300 members of 80 partnerships. As a result, the measures align with the values and practices of the very collaborations the measures were intended to assess.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"9 ","pages":"1210547"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing measures of complex collaborations with participatory, evidence-centered design.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin C Farrell, William R Penuel, Paula Arce-Trigatti, James Soland, Corinne Singleton, Alison Fox Resnick, Kristina Stamatis, Robbin Riedy, Erin Henrick, Stacey Sexton, Sarah Wellberg, Danny Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frma.2024.1210547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An increasingly popular form of collaboration involves forming partnerships among researchers, educators, and community members to improve or transform education systems through research inquiry. However, not all partnerships are successful. The field needs valid, reliable, and useful measures to help with assessing progress toward partnership goals. In this community case study, we present a participatory, mixed-methods approach for creating measures to assess the progress of education research-practice partnerships (RPPs). The case illustrates a novel approach to measurement design, driven by perspectives and feedback of over 300 members of 80 partnerships. As a result, the measures align with the values and practices of the very collaborations the measures were intended to assess.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"1210547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345517/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1210547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1210547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一种日益流行的合作形式是,研究人员、教育工作者和社区成员结成伙伴关系,通过研究探索改善或改造教育系统。然而,并非所有的合作关系都能取得成功。该领域需要有效、可靠和有用的措施来帮助评估实现合作目标的进展情况。在本社区案例研究中,我们介绍了一种参与式混合方法,用于创建评估教育研究与实践合作关系(RPPs)进展的措施。该案例展示了一种新颖的衡量设计方法,它受到 80 个合作伙伴关系的 300 多名成员的观点和反馈的推动。因此,这些衡量标准与所要评估的合作关系的价值观和实践相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing measures of complex collaborations with participatory, evidence-centered design.

An increasingly popular form of collaboration involves forming partnerships among researchers, educators, and community members to improve or transform education systems through research inquiry. However, not all partnerships are successful. The field needs valid, reliable, and useful measures to help with assessing progress toward partnership goals. In this community case study, we present a participatory, mixed-methods approach for creating measures to assess the progress of education research-practice partnerships (RPPs). The case illustrates a novel approach to measurement design, driven by perspectives and feedback of over 300 members of 80 partnerships. As a result, the measures align with the values and practices of the very collaborations the measures were intended to assess.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信