Stacy Davis, Devin English, Stephanie Shiau, Rajita Bhavaraju, Shauna Downs, Gwyneth M Eliasson, Kristen D Krause, Emily V Merchant, Tess Olsson, Michelle M Ruidíaz-Santiago, Nimit N Shah, Laura E Liang, Teri Lassiter
{"title":"在公共卫生学院开发和实施多样性、公平和包容课程的自我反思过程。","authors":"Stacy Davis, Devin English, Stephanie Shiau, Rajita Bhavaraju, Shauna Downs, Gwyneth M Eliasson, Kristen D Krause, Emily V Merchant, Tess Olsson, Michelle M Ruidíaz-Santiago, Nimit N Shah, Laura E Liang, Teri Lassiter","doi":"10.1177/00333549241271728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We critically reviewed the motivations, processes, and implementation methods underlying a faculty-driven diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) curriculum self-reflection project in the Rutgers School of Public Health. This case study offers guidance on a curriculum self-reflection tool that was developed through the school's Curriculum Committee to promote DEI throughout the school's curricula. We review the key steps in this process and the unique aspects of developing and implementing such evaluations within higher education. The study draws on faculty experience, was informed by students and staff within the Curriculum Committee, and builds on existing knowledge and tools. A flexible 6-step framework-including guiding principles and strategic approaches to planning, developing, and implementing a DEI curriculum self-assessment-is provided to assist instructors, curriculum committees, DEI groups, and academic leaders at schools of public health interested in refining their courses and curricula. Academic units experience contextual challenges, and while each is at a different stage in curriculum reform, our findings provide lessons about integrating the assessment of DEI in school curriculum in a systematic and iterative way. Our approach can be applied to diverse academic settings, including those experiencing similar implementation challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":20793,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Reports","volume":" ","pages":"333549241271728"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and Implementing a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Curriculum Self-reflection Process at a School of Public Health.\",\"authors\":\"Stacy Davis, Devin English, Stephanie Shiau, Rajita Bhavaraju, Shauna Downs, Gwyneth M Eliasson, Kristen D Krause, Emily V Merchant, Tess Olsson, Michelle M Ruidíaz-Santiago, Nimit N Shah, Laura E Liang, Teri Lassiter\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00333549241271728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We critically reviewed the motivations, processes, and implementation methods underlying a faculty-driven diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) curriculum self-reflection project in the Rutgers School of Public Health. This case study offers guidance on a curriculum self-reflection tool that was developed through the school's Curriculum Committee to promote DEI throughout the school's curricula. We review the key steps in this process and the unique aspects of developing and implementing such evaluations within higher education. The study draws on faculty experience, was informed by students and staff within the Curriculum Committee, and builds on existing knowledge and tools. A flexible 6-step framework-including guiding principles and strategic approaches to planning, developing, and implementing a DEI curriculum self-assessment-is provided to assist instructors, curriculum committees, DEI groups, and academic leaders at schools of public health interested in refining their courses and curricula. Academic units experience contextual challenges, and while each is at a different stage in curriculum reform, our findings provide lessons about integrating the assessment of DEI in school curriculum in a systematic and iterative way. Our approach can be applied to diverse academic settings, including those experiencing similar implementation challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"333549241271728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569645/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549241271728\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549241271728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们对罗格斯大学公共卫生学院由教师推动的多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)课程自我反思项目的动机、过程和实施方法进行了严格审查。本案例研究为课程自我反思工具提供了指导,该工具是通过学校的课程委员会开发的,目的是在学校的整个课程中促进多元化、公平和包容(DEI)。我们回顾了这一过程中的关键步骤,以及在高等教育中开发和实施此类评估的独特之处。这项研究借鉴了教师的经验,听取了课程委员会学生和教职员工的意见,并以现有的知识和工具为基础。本研究提供了一个灵活的 6 步框架,包括规划、开发和实施发展与教育课程自我评估的指导原则和战略方法,以帮助公共卫生学院的教师、课程委员会、发展与教育小组以及有兴趣完善其课程和教学大纲的学术带头人。各学术单位都面临着不同的挑战,虽然每个单位在课程改革中都处于不同的阶段,但我们的研究结果为以系统和迭代的方式在学校课程中整合 DEI 评估提供了经验。我们的方法可以应用于不同的学术环境,包括那些遇到类似实施挑战的学术环境。
Developing and Implementing a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Curriculum Self-reflection Process at a School of Public Health.
We critically reviewed the motivations, processes, and implementation methods underlying a faculty-driven diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) curriculum self-reflection project in the Rutgers School of Public Health. This case study offers guidance on a curriculum self-reflection tool that was developed through the school's Curriculum Committee to promote DEI throughout the school's curricula. We review the key steps in this process and the unique aspects of developing and implementing such evaluations within higher education. The study draws on faculty experience, was informed by students and staff within the Curriculum Committee, and builds on existing knowledge and tools. A flexible 6-step framework-including guiding principles and strategic approaches to planning, developing, and implementing a DEI curriculum self-assessment-is provided to assist instructors, curriculum committees, DEI groups, and academic leaders at schools of public health interested in refining their courses and curricula. Academic units experience contextual challenges, and while each is at a different stage in curriculum reform, our findings provide lessons about integrating the assessment of DEI in school curriculum in a systematic and iterative way. Our approach can be applied to diverse academic settings, including those experiencing similar implementation challenges.
期刊介绍:
Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, original research, public health law, and public health schools and teaching. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health.
The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal''s contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format.