在受过训练的人进行递增式自行车运动时,急性补充单酮不会改变运动效率。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Jack Bone, Sydney Baumgarten, Devin G McCarthy, William Bostad, Douglas L Richards, Martin J Gibala
{"title":"在受过训练的人进行递增式自行车运动时,急性补充单酮不会改变运动效率。","authors":"Jack Bone, Sydney Baumgarten, Devin G McCarthy, William Bostad, Douglas L Richards, Martin J Gibala","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight adults (16 males and 12 females) aged 30 ± 10 yr (peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ): 59 ± 11 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ) completed three experimental trials in a randomized, crossover, and double-blinded manner. Participants ingested either 0.3 (KE-LO) or 0.6 (KE-HI) g·kg -1 body mass of KE or a flavor-matched placebo (PLAC) ~30 min before exercise. Exercise involved a 3-min warm-up, three 5-min stages at fixed incremental workloads corresponding to 75%, 100%, and 125% of individual ventilatory threshold, followed by a ramp protocol to volitional exhaustion to determine peak power output (PPO).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Venous blood [ß-hydroxybutyrate], the major circulating ketone body, was higher after KE ingestion compared with PLAC (KE-HI: 3.0 ± 1.1 ≥ KE-LO: 2.3 ± 0.6 ≥ PLAC: 0.2 ± 0.1 mM; all P ≤ 0.001. There were no differences between conditions in the primary outcome exercise economy, nor gross efficiency or delta efficiency, when analyzed over the entire submaximal exercise period or by stage. Heart rate and ventilation were higher in KE-HI and KE-LO compared with PLAC when assessed over the entire submaximal exercise period and by stage (all P ≤ 0.05). PPO after the ramp was lower in KE-HI compared with both KE-LO and PLAC (329 ± 60 vs 339 ± 62 and 341 ± 61 W, respectively; both P < 0.05) despite no difference in V̇O 2peak .</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>KE ingestion did not change indices of exercise efficiency but increased markers of cardiorespiratory stress during submaximal incremental cycling and reduced PPO.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"163-172"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Ketone Monoester Supplementation Does Not Change Exercise Efficiency during Incremental Cycling in Trained Individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Jack Bone, Sydney Baumgarten, Devin G McCarthy, William Bostad, Douglas L Richards, Martin J Gibala\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight adults (16 males and 12 females) aged 30 ± 10 yr (peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ): 59 ± 11 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ) completed three experimental trials in a randomized, crossover, and double-blinded manner. Participants ingested either 0.3 (KE-LO) or 0.6 (KE-HI) g·kg -1 body mass of KE or a flavor-matched placebo (PLAC) ~30 min before exercise. Exercise involved a 3-min warm-up, three 5-min stages at fixed incremental workloads corresponding to 75%, 100%, and 125% of individual ventilatory threshold, followed by a ramp protocol to volitional exhaustion to determine peak power output (PPO).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Venous blood [ß-hydroxybutyrate], the major circulating ketone body, was higher after KE ingestion compared with PLAC (KE-HI: 3.0 ± 1.1 ≥ KE-LO: 2.3 ± 0.6 ≥ PLAC: 0.2 ± 0.1 mM; all P ≤ 0.001. There were no differences between conditions in the primary outcome exercise economy, nor gross efficiency or delta efficiency, when analyzed over the entire submaximal exercise period or by stage. Heart rate and ventilation were higher in KE-HI and KE-LO compared with PLAC when assessed over the entire submaximal exercise period and by stage (all P ≤ 0.05). PPO after the ramp was lower in KE-HI compared with both KE-LO and PLAC (329 ± 60 vs 339 ± 62 and 341 ± 61 W, respectively; both P < 0.05) despite no difference in V̇O 2peak .</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>KE ingestion did not change indices of exercise efficiency but increased markers of cardiorespiratory stress during submaximal incremental cycling and reduced PPO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"163-172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003532\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法:28名年龄在30 ± 10岁[峰值摄氧量(V.M.O.peak):59 ± 11 ml-kg-1-min-1]的成年人(16名男性和12名女性)以随机、交叉和双盲的方式完成了三项实验。参与者在运动前 30 分钟摄入 0.3(KE-LO)或 0.6(KE-HI)克/千克体重的 KE 或口味匹配的安慰剂(PLAC)。运动包括 3 分钟热身、三个 5 分钟的固定递增工作量阶段(分别为个人通气阈值的 75%、100% 和 125%),然后通过斜坡方案达到自愿力竭,以确定峰值功率输出(PPO):与 PLAC 相比,摄入 KE 后静脉血中的主要循环酮体[ß-羟丁酸]更高(KE-HI:3.0 ± 1.1 ≥ KE-LO:2.3 ± 0.6 ≥ PLAC:0.2 ± 0.1 mM;所有 p 均小于 0.001。在整个亚极限运动期间或按阶段进行分析时,不同条件下的主要结果运动经济性、总效率或δ效率均无差异。与 PLAC 相比,在整个亚极限运动期间和各阶段进行评估时,KE-HI 和 KE-LO 的心率和通气量更高(均 p ≤ 0.05)。尽管 V̇O2 峰值没有差异,但与 KE-LO 和 PLAC 相比,KE-HI 在斜坡后的 PPO 更低(分别为 329 ± 60 vs 339 ± 62 和 341 ± 61 W;均 p < 0.05):摄入KE不会改变运动效率指数,但会增加亚极限增量骑行时的心肺压力指标,并降低PPO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute Ketone Monoester Supplementation Does Not Change Exercise Efficiency during Incremental Cycling in Trained Individuals.

Methods: Twenty-eight adults (16 males and 12 females) aged 30 ± 10 yr (peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ): 59 ± 11 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ) completed three experimental trials in a randomized, crossover, and double-blinded manner. Participants ingested either 0.3 (KE-LO) or 0.6 (KE-HI) g·kg -1 body mass of KE or a flavor-matched placebo (PLAC) ~30 min before exercise. Exercise involved a 3-min warm-up, three 5-min stages at fixed incremental workloads corresponding to 75%, 100%, and 125% of individual ventilatory threshold, followed by a ramp protocol to volitional exhaustion to determine peak power output (PPO).

Results: Venous blood [ß-hydroxybutyrate], the major circulating ketone body, was higher after KE ingestion compared with PLAC (KE-HI: 3.0 ± 1.1 ≥ KE-LO: 2.3 ± 0.6 ≥ PLAC: 0.2 ± 0.1 mM; all P ≤ 0.001. There were no differences between conditions in the primary outcome exercise economy, nor gross efficiency or delta efficiency, when analyzed over the entire submaximal exercise period or by stage. Heart rate and ventilation were higher in KE-HI and KE-LO compared with PLAC when assessed over the entire submaximal exercise period and by stage (all P ≤ 0.05). PPO after the ramp was lower in KE-HI compared with both KE-LO and PLAC (329 ± 60 vs 339 ± 62 and 341 ± 61 W, respectively; both P < 0.05) despite no difference in V̇O 2peak .

Conclusions: KE ingestion did not change indices of exercise efficiency but increased markers of cardiorespiratory stress during submaximal incremental cycling and reduced PPO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信