新辅助化疗后的腋窝管理:腋针活检能否取代前哨节点活检?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13724
Emine Yildirim, Pelin Basim, Nese Ucar, Sibel Bektas, Kutay Iscen, Ebru Karci, Asena Ayca Ozdemir
{"title":"新辅助化疗后的腋窝管理:腋针活检能否取代前哨节点活检?","authors":"Emine Yildirim, Pelin Basim, Nese Ucar, Sibel Bektas, Kutay Iscen, Ebru Karci, Asena Ayca Ozdemir","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate whether it is possible to evaluate the axilla after treatment without performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary lymph node metastases who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, clinically designed study included patients with clinical T<sub>1-3</sub> and biopsy-proven N<sub>1</sub> breast cancer. Prior to the surgery scheduled after NAC, the patients were randomized into two groups. A biopsy sample was obtained from the clipped axillary lymph node, which was preoperatively known to be metastatic, using fine needle aspiration (FNAB) in the first group and core needle biopsy (CNB) in the second group. The predictive ability of the two biopsy methods for the SLNB results was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 50 female patients with breast cancer, with a mean age of 48.4±10.72 years. In both groups, metastasis was detected in nine patients, and no metastasis was seen in 14 patients. In intergroup comparisons, all patients with metastasis in the FNAB group also had metastasis according to SLNB, while 21.4% of the cases without metastasis in this group were metastatic according to SLNB. In the CNB group, metastasis was observed in all patients with metastasis according to SLNB, while no metastasis was detected in those who were reported to have no metastasis by SLNB. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity values for the prediction of SLNB results were all found to be 100% for CNB, whereas they were 87%, 100%, and 75%, respectively, for FNAB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CNB and FNAB could potentially replace SLNB due to their high accuracy rates in evaluating the axilla after NAC. The sensitivity and accuracy of CNB were determined to be higher.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Can Axillary Needle Biopsy Replace Sentinel Node Biopsy?\",\"authors\":\"Emine Yildirim, Pelin Basim, Nese Ucar, Sibel Bektas, Kutay Iscen, Ebru Karci, Asena Ayca Ozdemir\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/invivo.13724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate whether it is possible to evaluate the axilla after treatment without performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary lymph node metastases who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, clinically designed study included patients with clinical T<sub>1-3</sub> and biopsy-proven N<sub>1</sub> breast cancer. Prior to the surgery scheduled after NAC, the patients were randomized into two groups. A biopsy sample was obtained from the clipped axillary lymph node, which was preoperatively known to be metastatic, using fine needle aspiration (FNAB) in the first group and core needle biopsy (CNB) in the second group. The predictive ability of the two biopsy methods for the SLNB results was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 50 female patients with breast cancer, with a mean age of 48.4±10.72 years. In both groups, metastasis was detected in nine patients, and no metastasis was seen in 14 patients. In intergroup comparisons, all patients with metastasis in the FNAB group also had metastasis according to SLNB, while 21.4% of the cases without metastasis in this group were metastatic according to SLNB. In the CNB group, metastasis was observed in all patients with metastasis according to SLNB, while no metastasis was detected in those who were reported to have no metastasis by SLNB. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity values for the prediction of SLNB results were all found to be 100% for CNB, whereas they were 87%, 100%, and 75%, respectively, for FNAB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CNB and FNAB could potentially replace SLNB due to their high accuracy rates in evaluating the axilla after NAC. The sensitivity and accuracy of CNB were determined to be higher.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In vivo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363797/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In vivo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13724\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13724","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:该研究旨在探讨对于活检证实有腋窝淋巴结转移并接受了新辅助化疗(NAC)的乳腺癌患者,是否可以在治疗后不进行前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)而对腋窝进行评估:这项前瞻性、随机、临床设计的研究纳入了临床症状为T1-3、活检证实为N1的乳腺癌患者。在 NAC 后的手术安排之前,患者被随机分为两组。第一组患者采用细针穿刺术(FNAB),第二组患者采用核心针活检术(CNB),从术前已知有转移的腋窝淋巴结剪取活检样本。评估了两种活检方法对 SLNB 结果的预测能力:研究对象包括 50 名女性乳腺癌患者,平均年龄(48.4±10.72)岁。两组患者中均有 9 例发现转移,14 例未发现转移。在组间比较中,FNAB 组中所有有转移的患者根据 SLNB 检查也有转移,而该组中 21.4% 没有转移的病例根据 SLNB 检查也有转移。在 CNB 组中,根据 SLNB 检查发现所有有转移的患者都有转移,而根据 SLNB 检查报告没有转移的患者则没有发现转移。CNB预测SLNB结果的准确性、特异性和灵敏度值均为100%,而FNAB的准确性、特异性和灵敏度值分别为87%、100%和75%:结论:由于 CNB 和 FNAB 在评估 NAC 后腋窝的准确率较高,因此两者都有可能取代 SLNB。CNB的灵敏度和准确度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Can Axillary Needle Biopsy Replace Sentinel Node Biopsy?

Background/aim: The aim of the study was to investigate whether it is possible to evaluate the axilla after treatment without performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary lymph node metastases who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Patients and methods: This prospective, randomized, clinically designed study included patients with clinical T1-3 and biopsy-proven N1 breast cancer. Prior to the surgery scheduled after NAC, the patients were randomized into two groups. A biopsy sample was obtained from the clipped axillary lymph node, which was preoperatively known to be metastatic, using fine needle aspiration (FNAB) in the first group and core needle biopsy (CNB) in the second group. The predictive ability of the two biopsy methods for the SLNB results was evaluated.

Results: The study included 50 female patients with breast cancer, with a mean age of 48.4±10.72 years. In both groups, metastasis was detected in nine patients, and no metastasis was seen in 14 patients. In intergroup comparisons, all patients with metastasis in the FNAB group also had metastasis according to SLNB, while 21.4% of the cases without metastasis in this group were metastatic according to SLNB. In the CNB group, metastasis was observed in all patients with metastasis according to SLNB, while no metastasis was detected in those who were reported to have no metastasis by SLNB. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity values for the prediction of SLNB results were all found to be 100% for CNB, whereas they were 87%, 100%, and 75%, respectively, for FNAB.

Conclusion: Both CNB and FNAB could potentially replace SLNB due to their high accuracy rates in evaluating the axilla after NAC. The sensitivity and accuracy of CNB were determined to be higher.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信