局部晚期非小细胞肺癌新辅助化疗的辅助化疗。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13723
Ryo Miyata, Masaya Aoki, Shoichiro Morizono, Tadashi Umehara, Aya Harada-Takeda, G O Kamimura, Toshiyuki Nagata, Kazuhiro Ueda
{"title":"局部晚期非小细胞肺癌新辅助化疗的辅助化疗。","authors":"Ryo Miyata, Masaya Aoki, Shoichiro Morizono, Tadashi Umehara, Aya Harada-Takeda, G O Kamimura, Toshiyuki Nagata, Kazuhiro Ueda","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The prognostic impact of adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy for patients with resectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who underwent surgery following neoadjuvant therapy for clinical T3N0 or N1-N2 resectable NSCLC between 2011 and 2016 at our hospital. Survival outcomes were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazard model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight patients were identified. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 50.6 months and overall survival (OS) was 75.2 months. Patients who had undergone adjuvant chemotherapy were not associated with a favorable RFS (hazard ratio=1.01, p=0.98) or OS (hazard ratio=0.72, p=0.55), as compared with those who had not. However, subgroup analysis revealed that hazard ratio based on RFS and OS varied greatly between subgroups, suggesting that selected patients might benefit from adjuvant therapy, while others might be harmed by it. For example, in surgical-pathological stage III disease, adjuvant therapy showed a favorable RFS (HR=0.22, 95%CI=0.02-2.57, p=0.23) and OS (HR=0.36, 95%CI=0.03-4.01, p=0.40). Conversely, in surgical-pathological stage 0-II disease, adjuvant therapy showed an unfavorable RFS (HR=1.40, 95%CI=0.49-3.96, p=0.53) and OS (HR=0.95, 95%CI=0.29-3.12, p=0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the negative findings in our overall patient cohort, our results may be beneficial in identifying patients who may likely benefit from adjuvant therapy. This contribution could assist the planning of large-scale prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Addition to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ryo Miyata, Masaya Aoki, Shoichiro Morizono, Tadashi Umehara, Aya Harada-Takeda, G O Kamimura, Toshiyuki Nagata, Kazuhiro Ueda\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/invivo.13723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The prognostic impact of adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy for patients with resectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who underwent surgery following neoadjuvant therapy for clinical T3N0 or N1-N2 resectable NSCLC between 2011 and 2016 at our hospital. Survival outcomes were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazard model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight patients were identified. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 50.6 months and overall survival (OS) was 75.2 months. Patients who had undergone adjuvant chemotherapy were not associated with a favorable RFS (hazard ratio=1.01, p=0.98) or OS (hazard ratio=0.72, p=0.55), as compared with those who had not. However, subgroup analysis revealed that hazard ratio based on RFS and OS varied greatly between subgroups, suggesting that selected patients might benefit from adjuvant therapy, while others might be harmed by it. For example, in surgical-pathological stage III disease, adjuvant therapy showed a favorable RFS (HR=0.22, 95%CI=0.02-2.57, p=0.23) and OS (HR=0.36, 95%CI=0.03-4.01, p=0.40). Conversely, in surgical-pathological stage 0-II disease, adjuvant therapy showed an unfavorable RFS (HR=1.40, 95%CI=0.49-3.96, p=0.53) and OS (HR=0.95, 95%CI=0.29-3.12, p=0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the negative findings in our overall patient cohort, our results may be beneficial in identifying patients who may likely benefit from adjuvant therapy. This contribution could assist the planning of large-scale prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In vivo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363782/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In vivo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13723\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:对于新辅助化疗后接受手术治疗的可切除局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,辅助细胞毒性化疗对其预后的影响仍不明确:我们进行了一项回顾性病历审查,以确定2011年至2016年间在我院接受新辅助治疗后接受手术治疗的临床T3N0或N1-N2可切除NSCLC患者。采用卡普兰-梅耶尔法和Cox比例危险模型对生存结果进行了分析:结果:共发现38例患者。中位无复发生存期(RFS)为50.6个月,总生存期(OS)为75.2个月。与未接受辅助化疗的患者相比,接受过辅助化疗的患者RFS(危险比=1.01,P=0.98)或OS(危险比=0.72,P=0.55)并不乐观。然而,亚组分析显示,基于RFS和OS的危险比在不同亚组之间存在很大差异,这表明部分患者可能从辅助治疗中获益,而另一些患者则可能因此受到伤害。例如,对于手术病理分期为III期的疾病,辅助治疗显示出良好的RFS(HR=0.22,95%CI=0.02-2.57,P=0.23)和OS(HR=0.36,95%CI=0.03-4.01,P=0.40)。相反,对于手术病理分期为0-II期的疾病,辅助治疗显示出不利的RFS(HR=1.40,95%CI=0.49-3.96,P=0.53)和OS(HR=0.95,95%CI=0.29-3.12,P=0.93):尽管在我们的总体患者队列中出现了阴性结果,但我们的研究结果可能有利于识别可能从辅助治疗中获益的患者。这有助于规划大规模的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Addition to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Background/aim: The prognostic impact of adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy for patients with resectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear.

Patients and methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who underwent surgery following neoadjuvant therapy for clinical T3N0 or N1-N2 resectable NSCLC between 2011 and 2016 at our hospital. Survival outcomes were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazard model.

Results: Thirty-eight patients were identified. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 50.6 months and overall survival (OS) was 75.2 months. Patients who had undergone adjuvant chemotherapy were not associated with a favorable RFS (hazard ratio=1.01, p=0.98) or OS (hazard ratio=0.72, p=0.55), as compared with those who had not. However, subgroup analysis revealed that hazard ratio based on RFS and OS varied greatly between subgroups, suggesting that selected patients might benefit from adjuvant therapy, while others might be harmed by it. For example, in surgical-pathological stage III disease, adjuvant therapy showed a favorable RFS (HR=0.22, 95%CI=0.02-2.57, p=0.23) and OS (HR=0.36, 95%CI=0.03-4.01, p=0.40). Conversely, in surgical-pathological stage 0-II disease, adjuvant therapy showed an unfavorable RFS (HR=1.40, 95%CI=0.49-3.96, p=0.53) and OS (HR=0.95, 95%CI=0.29-3.12, p=0.93).

Conclusion: Regardless of the negative findings in our overall patient cohort, our results may be beneficial in identifying patients who may likely benefit from adjuvant therapy. This contribution could assist the planning of large-scale prospective studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信