前列腺顶端尿道粘膜的预处理:预防前列腺铥激光去核术后压力性尿失禁的回顾性研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1305006
Yunfeng Liao, Yuting Wu, Junrong Zou, Ruohui Huang, Wei Xia, Yuanhu Yuan, Rihai Xiao, Xiaoning Wang, Gengqing Wu, Xiaofeng Zou, Guoxi Zhang
{"title":"前列腺顶端尿道粘膜的预处理:预防前列腺铥激光去核术后压力性尿失禁的回顾性研究。","authors":"Yunfeng Liao, Yuting Wu, Junrong Zou, Ruohui Huang, Wei Xia, Yuanhu Yuan, Rihai Xiao, Xiaoning Wang, Gengqing Wu, Xiaofeng Zou, Guoxi Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1305006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore the clinical application value of urethral mucosal pretreatment at the tip of the prostate in preventing stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-seven patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with ThuLEP from June 2021 to December 2022 were divided into two groups. Of these, 42 patients (group A) underwent conventional ThuLEP and 45 patients (group B) were enucleated after pretreatment of the urethral mucosa. At the tip of the prostate, pretreatment of the urethral mucosa consisted of pushing the gland separately on both sides at the level of the verumontanum and cutting off the mucosa near the external urethral sphincter clockwise and counterclockwise. The perioperative and postoperative follow-up indicators [operation time, hemoglobin reduction, complications, Qmax, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), and post-void residual (PVR) volume] of the two groups of patients were collected and compared. All patients were followed up 1 month after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 87 procedures were successfully completed. There was no significant difference in age and gland size between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). There was no significant difference between operating time and hemoglobin reduction in the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The Qmax, IPSS, QOL, and PVR volume were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Temporary SUI occurred in both groups [12 cases (28.5%) in group A and 3 cases (6.7%) in group B (<i>P</i> < 0.05)]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of infection and urethral stricture between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pretreatment of the urethral mucosa before ThuLEP for BPH significantly reduces the incidence of SUI after surgery. This technique, which preconditions the apical urethral mucosa of the prostate, is safe and effective, has few complications, and is worthy of clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pretreatment of the urethral mucosa at the tip of the prostate: a retrospective review in preventing stress urinary incontinence after thulium laser enucleation of the prostate.\",\"authors\":\"Yunfeng Liao, Yuting Wu, Junrong Zou, Ruohui Huang, Wei Xia, Yuanhu Yuan, Rihai Xiao, Xiaoning Wang, Gengqing Wu, Xiaofeng Zou, Guoxi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1305006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore the clinical application value of urethral mucosal pretreatment at the tip of the prostate in preventing stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-seven patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with ThuLEP from June 2021 to December 2022 were divided into two groups. Of these, 42 patients (group A) underwent conventional ThuLEP and 45 patients (group B) were enucleated after pretreatment of the urethral mucosa. At the tip of the prostate, pretreatment of the urethral mucosa consisted of pushing the gland separately on both sides at the level of the verumontanum and cutting off the mucosa near the external urethral sphincter clockwise and counterclockwise. The perioperative and postoperative follow-up indicators [operation time, hemoglobin reduction, complications, Qmax, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), and post-void residual (PVR) volume] of the two groups of patients were collected and compared. All patients were followed up 1 month after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 87 procedures were successfully completed. There was no significant difference in age and gland size between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). There was no significant difference between operating time and hemoglobin reduction in the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The Qmax, IPSS, QOL, and PVR volume were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Temporary SUI occurred in both groups [12 cases (28.5%) in group A and 3 cases (6.7%) in group B (<i>P</i> < 0.05)]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of infection and urethral stricture between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pretreatment of the urethral mucosa before ThuLEP for BPH significantly reduces the incidence of SUI after surgery. This technique, which preconditions the apical urethral mucosa of the prostate, is safe and effective, has few complications, and is worthy of clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345196/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1305006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1305006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨前列腺顶端尿道粘膜预处理在预防前列腺铥激光去核术(ThuLEP)后压力性尿失禁(SUI)中的临床应用价值:将2021年6月至2022年12月期间接受ThuLEP治疗的87名良性前列腺增生症(BPH)患者分为两组。其中,42 名患者(A 组)接受常规 ThuLEP 治疗,45 名患者(B 组)在预处理尿道粘膜后进行去核。在前列腺顶端,尿道粘膜预处理包括在膀胱水平分别向两侧推挤腺体,并顺时针和逆时针切断尿道外括约肌附近的粘膜。收集并比较两组患者的围手术期和术后随访指标[手术时间、血红蛋白降低、并发症、Qmax、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量(QoL)和排尿后残余尿量(PVR)]。所有患者在术后 1 个月接受随访:所有 87 例手术均顺利完成。两组患者的年龄和腺体大小无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组患者的手术时间和血红蛋白降低率无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组的 Qmax、IPSS、QOL 和 PVR 容量在术后均有明显改善(P P > 0.05):结论:在 ThuLEP 治疗良性前列腺增生症前对尿道粘膜进行预处理可明显降低术后 SUI 的发生率。这种对前列腺顶端尿道粘膜进行预处理的技术安全有效,并发症少,值得临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pretreatment of the urethral mucosa at the tip of the prostate: a retrospective review in preventing stress urinary incontinence after thulium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Objective: Explore the clinical application value of urethral mucosal pretreatment at the tip of the prostate in preventing stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP).

Methods: Eighty-seven patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with ThuLEP from June 2021 to December 2022 were divided into two groups. Of these, 42 patients (group A) underwent conventional ThuLEP and 45 patients (group B) were enucleated after pretreatment of the urethral mucosa. At the tip of the prostate, pretreatment of the urethral mucosa consisted of pushing the gland separately on both sides at the level of the verumontanum and cutting off the mucosa near the external urethral sphincter clockwise and counterclockwise. The perioperative and postoperative follow-up indicators [operation time, hemoglobin reduction, complications, Qmax, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), and post-void residual (PVR) volume] of the two groups of patients were collected and compared. All patients were followed up 1 month after surgery.

Results: All 87 procedures were successfully completed. There was no significant difference in age and gland size between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between operating time and hemoglobin reduction in the two groups (P > 0.05). The Qmax, IPSS, QOL, and PVR volume were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups (P < 0.05). Temporary SUI occurred in both groups [12 cases (28.5%) in group A and 3 cases (6.7%) in group B (P < 0.05)]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of infection and urethral stricture between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Pretreatment of the urethral mucosa before ThuLEP for BPH significantly reduces the incidence of SUI after surgery. This technique, which preconditions the apical urethral mucosa of the prostate, is safe and effective, has few complications, and is worthy of clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信