双相情感障碍心理干预的活性成分和作用机制:系统性文献综述。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bipolar Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1111/bdi.13464
Duygu Serbetci, Zhao Hui Koh, Greg Murray, Hailey Tremain
{"title":"双相情感障碍心理干预的活性成分和作用机制:系统性文献综述。","authors":"Duygu Serbetci, Zhao Hui Koh, Greg Murray, Hailey Tremain","doi":"10.1111/bdi.13464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The efficacy of psychological interventions for bipolar disorder (BD) is well established, but much remains unknown about how change occurs. The primary objective of this exploratory study was to audit what is known about active components and mechanisms of action of psychological interventions for BD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42022323276). Two independent reviewers screened references from four databases and extracted data from eligible studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included four component studies, six studies with mediation analyses and 26 studies presenting subjective experiences of how psychological interventions bring change. Ten mediators were examined across six studies, with only one putative mediator, medication adherence, tested in more than one study. Some initial support for mediation of varied outcomes by control over thoughts, positive non-verbal behaviour, self-esteem, post-trauma growth and medication adherence. Some preliminary support was found in two components, human support and IPT. Studies exploring participant experiences of therapeutic change enumerated a range of potential active components, mechanisms of action and contextual factors potentially warranting investigation in future research. However, the evidence base for active components and mechanisms of action in psychological interventions for BD is unsatisfactory. Findings were inconsistent, studies homogenous with significant methodological limitations and statistical approaches failed to meet quality criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary identification of potential components and mechanisms via qualitative analyses and the insights emerging from this review will inform future research aimed at investigating how psychological interventions work in BD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8959,"journal":{"name":"Bipolar Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"661-683"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Active components and mechanisms of action of psychological interventions in bipolar disorder: A systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Duygu Serbetci, Zhao Hui Koh, Greg Murray, Hailey Tremain\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bdi.13464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The efficacy of psychological interventions for bipolar disorder (BD) is well established, but much remains unknown about how change occurs. The primary objective of this exploratory study was to audit what is known about active components and mechanisms of action of psychological interventions for BD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42022323276). Two independent reviewers screened references from four databases and extracted data from eligible studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included four component studies, six studies with mediation analyses and 26 studies presenting subjective experiences of how psychological interventions bring change. Ten mediators were examined across six studies, with only one putative mediator, medication adherence, tested in more than one study. Some initial support for mediation of varied outcomes by control over thoughts, positive non-verbal behaviour, self-esteem, post-trauma growth and medication adherence. Some preliminary support was found in two components, human support and IPT. Studies exploring participant experiences of therapeutic change enumerated a range of potential active components, mechanisms of action and contextual factors potentially warranting investigation in future research. However, the evidence base for active components and mechanisms of action in psychological interventions for BD is unsatisfactory. Findings were inconsistent, studies homogenous with significant methodological limitations and statistical approaches failed to meet quality criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary identification of potential components and mechanisms via qualitative analyses and the insights emerging from this review will inform future research aimed at investigating how psychological interventions work in BD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bipolar Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"661-683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bipolar Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.13464\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.13464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心理干预对双相情感障碍(BD)的疗效已得到公认,但关于改变是如何发生的仍有许多未知数。这项探索性研究的主要目的是对躁狂症心理干预的有效成分和作用机制进行审核:我们进行了一项系统性综述(PROSPERO CRD42022323276)。两名独立评审员筛选了四个数据库中的参考文献,并从符合条件的研究中提取了数据:我们纳入了四项成分研究、六项中介分析研究以及 26 项介绍心理干预如何带来改变的主观体验的研究。六项研究对十个中介因素进行了研究,只有一个假定中介因素(坚持用药)在多项研究中进行了测试。初步支持通过控制思想、积极的非语言行为、自尊、创伤后成长和坚持服药来调节不同的结果。人类支持和综合治疗法这两个组成部分也得到了一些初步支持。探索参与者治疗变化经验的研究列举了一系列潜在的有效成分、作用机制和背景因素,这些都可能值得在未来的研究中进行调查。然而,有关 BD 心理干预的活性成分和作用机制的证据基础并不令人满意。研究结果不一致,研究同质化严重,研究方法存在重大局限性,统计方法不符合质量标准:通过定性分析初步确定潜在的成分和机制,以及从本综述中获得的启示,将为今后旨在调查心理干预如何对 BD 起作用的研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Active components and mechanisms of action of psychological interventions in bipolar disorder: A systematic literature review.

Objective: The efficacy of psychological interventions for bipolar disorder (BD) is well established, but much remains unknown about how change occurs. The primary objective of this exploratory study was to audit what is known about active components and mechanisms of action of psychological interventions for BD.

Method: We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42022323276). Two independent reviewers screened references from four databases and extracted data from eligible studies.

Results: We included four component studies, six studies with mediation analyses and 26 studies presenting subjective experiences of how psychological interventions bring change. Ten mediators were examined across six studies, with only one putative mediator, medication adherence, tested in more than one study. Some initial support for mediation of varied outcomes by control over thoughts, positive non-verbal behaviour, self-esteem, post-trauma growth and medication adherence. Some preliminary support was found in two components, human support and IPT. Studies exploring participant experiences of therapeutic change enumerated a range of potential active components, mechanisms of action and contextual factors potentially warranting investigation in future research. However, the evidence base for active components and mechanisms of action in psychological interventions for BD is unsatisfactory. Findings were inconsistent, studies homogenous with significant methodological limitations and statistical approaches failed to meet quality criteria.

Conclusions: Preliminary identification of potential components and mechanisms via qualitative analyses and the insights emerging from this review will inform future research aimed at investigating how psychological interventions work in BD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bipolar Disorders
Bipolar Disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bipolar Disorders is an international journal that publishes all research of relevance for the basic mechanisms, clinical aspects, or treatment of bipolar disorders and related illnesses. It intends to provide a single international outlet for new research in this area and covers research in the following areas: biochemistry physiology neuropsychopharmacology neuroanatomy neuropathology genetics brain imaging epidemiology phenomenology clinical aspects and therapeutics of bipolar disorders Bipolar Disorders also contains papers that form the development of new therapeutic strategies for these disorders as well as papers on the topics of schizoaffective disorders, and depressive disorders as these can be cyclic disorders with areas of overlap with bipolar disorders. The journal will consider for publication submissions within the domain of: Perspectives, Research Articles, Correspondence, Clinical Corner, and Reflections. Within these there are a number of types of articles: invited editorials, debates, review articles, original articles, commentaries, letters to the editors, clinical conundrums, clinical curiosities, clinical care, and musings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信