在控制循环死亡后捐献的肺移植中使用扩展标准捐献者。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Wenxi Zhang, Chenyu Zhang, Hanqun Liu, Wenjie Jiao
{"title":"在控制循环死亡后捐献的肺移植中使用扩展标准捐献者。","authors":"Wenxi Zhang,&nbsp;Chenyu Zhang,&nbsp;Hanqun Liu,&nbsp;Wenjie Jiao","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Most institutions apply the criteria for controlled donation after cardiac death (cDCD) lung retrieval identical to the criteria for donation after brain death (DBD). The availability of extended criteria donor (ECD) in lung transplants from cDCD remains unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for adult lung transplants from cDCD, from May 03, 2005, to March 15, 2022. ECDs were defined by one or more items at variance from standard criteria: age 55 years or more, PaO<sub>2</sub>:FiO<sub>2</sub> 300 or less, smoking 20 pack-years or more, diabetes, or purulent secretions upon bronchoscopy. Recipients were divided into the standard criteria donor (SCD) group and the ECD group, and assessed for short- and long-term survival and postoperative events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 827 records, the SCD and ECD group showed no differences in 5-year (<em>P</em> = .56) survival. No significant differences were found in 30-day, 90-day, 1-year mortality and postoperative outcomes before discharge, whether in length of hospital stay, rate of ventilator support for &gt;48 hours or reintubation, incidence of grade 3 PGD 72 hours posttransplant, acute rejection, or dialysis. None of the 5 donor factors used as criteria for lung retrieval was independently associated with cDCD recipient survival.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Using donor lungs that extend the DBD criteria may be a safe strategy in cDCD lung transplantation. However, the current criteria may not be a perfect fit for cDCD lung retrieval. The specific DCD criteria for standard lung retrieval need to be determined.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"56 7","pages":"Pages 1633-1638"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extended Criteria Donor Use in Lung Transplants From Donation After Controlled Circulatory Death\",\"authors\":\"Wenxi Zhang,&nbsp;Chenyu Zhang,&nbsp;Hanqun Liu,&nbsp;Wenjie Jiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Most institutions apply the criteria for controlled donation after cardiac death (cDCD) lung retrieval identical to the criteria for donation after brain death (DBD). The availability of extended criteria donor (ECD) in lung transplants from cDCD remains unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for adult lung transplants from cDCD, from May 03, 2005, to March 15, 2022. ECDs were defined by one or more items at variance from standard criteria: age 55 years or more, PaO<sub>2</sub>:FiO<sub>2</sub> 300 or less, smoking 20 pack-years or more, diabetes, or purulent secretions upon bronchoscopy. Recipients were divided into the standard criteria donor (SCD) group and the ECD group, and assessed for short- and long-term survival and postoperative events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 827 records, the SCD and ECD group showed no differences in 5-year (<em>P</em> = .56) survival. No significant differences were found in 30-day, 90-day, 1-year mortality and postoperative outcomes before discharge, whether in length of hospital stay, rate of ventilator support for &gt;48 hours or reintubation, incidence of grade 3 PGD 72 hours posttransplant, acute rejection, or dialysis. None of the 5 donor factors used as criteria for lung retrieval was independently associated with cDCD recipient survival.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Using donor lungs that extend the DBD criteria may be a safe strategy in cDCD lung transplantation. However, the current criteria may not be a perfect fit for cDCD lung retrieval. The specific DCD criteria for standard lung retrieval need to be determined.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\"56 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1633-1638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524004263\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524004263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数机构采用与脑死亡(DBD)后捐献标准相同的心脏死亡(cDCD)后肺回收控制捐献标准。方法:对器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库进行了查询:方法:我们查询了器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库2005年5月3日至2022年3月15日期间cDCD成人肺移植的情况。ECD的定义有一项或多项与标准标准不一致:年龄55岁或以上、PaO2:FiO2 300或以下、吸烟20包年或以上、糖尿病或支气管镜检查有脓性分泌物。受者被分为标准标准供体(SCD)组和ECD组,并对短期和长期存活率及术后事件进行评估:结果:在 827 份记录中,SCD 组和 ECD 组的 5 年存活率没有差异(P = .56)。在出院前的 30 天、90 天、1 年死亡率和术后结果方面,无论是住院时间、呼吸机支持超过 48 小时或再次插管率、移植后 72 小时 3 级 PGD 发生率、急性排斥反应或透析,均未发现明显差异。作为取肺标准的5个供体因素均与cDCD受体存活率无关:结论:在 cDCD 肺移植中,使用扩大 DBD 标准的供肺可能是一种安全的策略。结论:在 cDCD 肺移植中使用扩展 DBD 标准的供肺可能是一种安全的策略,但目前的标准可能并不完全适合 cDCD 肺回收。标准肺取材的具体DCD标准有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extended Criteria Donor Use in Lung Transplants From Donation After Controlled Circulatory Death

Background

Most institutions apply the criteria for controlled donation after cardiac death (cDCD) lung retrieval identical to the criteria for donation after brain death (DBD). The availability of extended criteria donor (ECD) in lung transplants from cDCD remains unclear.

Methods

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for adult lung transplants from cDCD, from May 03, 2005, to March 15, 2022. ECDs were defined by one or more items at variance from standard criteria: age 55 years or more, PaO2:FiO2 300 or less, smoking 20 pack-years or more, diabetes, or purulent secretions upon bronchoscopy. Recipients were divided into the standard criteria donor (SCD) group and the ECD group, and assessed for short- and long-term survival and postoperative events.

Results

Among 827 records, the SCD and ECD group showed no differences in 5-year (P = .56) survival. No significant differences were found in 30-day, 90-day, 1-year mortality and postoperative outcomes before discharge, whether in length of hospital stay, rate of ventilator support for >48 hours or reintubation, incidence of grade 3 PGD 72 hours posttransplant, acute rejection, or dialysis. None of the 5 donor factors used as criteria for lung retrieval was independently associated with cDCD recipient survival.

Conclusions

Using donor lungs that extend the DBD criteria may be a safe strategy in cDCD lung transplantation. However, the current criteria may not be a perfect fit for cDCD lung retrieval. The specific DCD criteria for standard lung retrieval need to be determined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信