患者积极性重要吗?对急诊科出院后轻度虚弱的老年人中患者积极性与医疗保健使用之间关系的研究。

Kristie Harper, Melinda Williamson, Glenn Arendts, Deborah Edwards, Bridgette Buller, Jenna Haak, Angela Jacques, Annette Barton, Antonio Petta, Antonio Celenza
{"title":"患者积极性重要吗?对急诊科出院后轻度虚弱的老年人中患者积极性与医疗保健使用之间关系的研究。","authors":"Kristie Harper, Melinda Williamson, Glenn Arendts, Deborah Edwards, Bridgette Buller, Jenna Haak, Angela Jacques, Annette Barton, Antonio Petta, Antonio Celenza","doi":"10.1071/AH24033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivePatient engagement, as measured by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM®), has been used to assess patients' ability to manage their own care. This study aimed to determine whether the PAM® could predict healthcare use in older adults aged >70years, living independently in the community with mild frailty, within 30days after emergency department (ED) discharge.MethodsA prospective single-centre observational cohort study was completed including older adults who presented to an ED. The 13-item PAM® and selected International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measures were completed prior to ED discharge.ResultsTwo hundred patients were recruited with a mean age of 84.8years (s.d. 6.9). The mean PAM® score was 58.6 (s.d. 13.3), with 12.5% at Level 1 (n=25), 40% at Level 2 (n=80), 34.5% at Level 3 (n=69) and 13.0% at Level 4 (n=26). The PAM® level was significantly associated with ED presentations in the past 6months (P=0.030). The PAM® level did not predict healthcare use within 30days of discharge consisting of time until ED representation (P=0.557), number of ED representations (P=0.560), number of hospital admissions (P=0.499), length of stay in hospital (P=0.254) and number of post-discharge contacts (P=0.667).ConclusionsOverall, the PAM® did not predict prospective short-term healthcare use. However, the PAM® was significantly associated with 6-month previous ED use. With more than 50% of patients at Level 1 or 2, indicating lower capacity for self-management, tailored interventions are required to assist mildly frail patients to manage discharge care plans and engage in preventative strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and healthcare use in older adults with mild frailty after discharge from an emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"Kristie Harper, Melinda Williamson, Glenn Arendts, Deborah Edwards, Bridgette Buller, Jenna Haak, Angela Jacques, Annette Barton, Antonio Petta, Antonio Celenza\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/AH24033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivePatient engagement, as measured by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM®), has been used to assess patients' ability to manage their own care. This study aimed to determine whether the PAM® could predict healthcare use in older adults aged >70years, living independently in the community with mild frailty, within 30days after emergency department (ED) discharge.MethodsA prospective single-centre observational cohort study was completed including older adults who presented to an ED. The 13-item PAM® and selected International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measures were completed prior to ED discharge.ResultsTwo hundred patients were recruited with a mean age of 84.8years (s.d. 6.9). The mean PAM® score was 58.6 (s.d. 13.3), with 12.5% at Level 1 (n=25), 40% at Level 2 (n=80), 34.5% at Level 3 (n=69) and 13.0% at Level 4 (n=26). The PAM® level was significantly associated with ED presentations in the past 6months (P=0.030). The PAM® level did not predict healthcare use within 30days of discharge consisting of time until ED representation (P=0.557), number of ED representations (P=0.560), number of hospital admissions (P=0.499), length of stay in hospital (P=0.254) and number of post-discharge contacts (P=0.667).ConclusionsOverall, the PAM® did not predict prospective short-term healthcare use. However, the PAM® was significantly associated with 6-month previous ED use. With more than 50% of patients at Level 1 or 2, indicating lower capacity for self-management, tailored interventions are required to assist mildly frail patients to manage discharge care plans and engage in preventative strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的患者参与度(Patient Activation Measure,PAM®)用于评估患者管理自身护理的能力。本研究旨在确定 PAM® 是否能预测急诊科(ED)出院后 30 天内,年龄大于 70 岁、在社区独立生活且有轻度虚弱的老年人使用医疗服务的情况。方法完成了一项前瞻性单中心观察队列研究,研究对象包括急诊科就诊的老年人。结果共招募了 200 名患者,平均年龄为 84.8 岁(s.d. 6.9)。平均 PAM® 得分为 58.6(标准差为 13.3),其中 12.5% 为 1 级(人数=25),40% 为 2 级(人数=80),34.5% 为 3 级(人数=69),13.0% 为 4 级(人数=26)。PAM® 水平与过去 6 个月的急诊就诊率明显相关(P=0.030)。PAM® 水平无法预测出院后 30 天内的医疗保健使用情况,包括 ED 就诊时间(P=0.557)、ED 就诊次数(P=0.560)、入院次数(P=0.499)、住院时间(P=0.254)和出院后接触次数(P=0.667)。然而,PAM® 与之前 6 个月的急诊室使用率有显著相关性。50%以上的患者处于1级或2级,表明其自我管理能力较低,因此需要采取有针对性的干预措施,帮助轻度体弱患者管理出院护理计划并参与预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and healthcare use in older adults with mild frailty after discharge from an emergency department.

ObjectivePatient engagement, as measured by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM®), has been used to assess patients' ability to manage their own care. This study aimed to determine whether the PAM® could predict healthcare use in older adults aged >70years, living independently in the community with mild frailty, within 30days after emergency department (ED) discharge.MethodsA prospective single-centre observational cohort study was completed including older adults who presented to an ED. The 13-item PAM® and selected International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measures were completed prior to ED discharge.ResultsTwo hundred patients were recruited with a mean age of 84.8years (s.d. 6.9). The mean PAM® score was 58.6 (s.d. 13.3), with 12.5% at Level 1 (n=25), 40% at Level 2 (n=80), 34.5% at Level 3 (n=69) and 13.0% at Level 4 (n=26). The PAM® level was significantly associated with ED presentations in the past 6months (P=0.030). The PAM® level did not predict healthcare use within 30days of discharge consisting of time until ED representation (P=0.557), number of ED representations (P=0.560), number of hospital admissions (P=0.499), length of stay in hospital (P=0.254) and number of post-discharge contacts (P=0.667).ConclusionsOverall, the PAM® did not predict prospective short-term healthcare use. However, the PAM® was significantly associated with 6-month previous ED use. With more than 50% of patients at Level 1 or 2, indicating lower capacity for self-management, tailored interventions are required to assist mildly frail patients to manage discharge care plans and engage in preventative strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信