老年人急性基底动脉闭塞性中风的血管内血栓切除术与药物治疗对比。

Huanwen Chen, Marco Colasurdo, Mihir Khunte, Ajay Malhotra, Dheeraj Gandhi
{"title":"老年人急性基底动脉闭塞性中风的血管内血栓切除术与药物治疗对比。","authors":"Huanwen Chen, Marco Colasurdo, Mihir Khunte, Ajay Malhotra, Dheeraj Gandhi","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for elderly basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke patients is unclear.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was an explorative retrospective analysis of the 2016-21 National Inpatient Sample in the United States. Elderly BAO stroke patients (80 years or older) with NIH stroke scale of at least 5 were included. Primary outcome was discharge to home. Secondary outcomes include in-hospital mortality and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Outcomes were compared between patients treated with EVT and those treated with medical management (MM) alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control for confounders. Subgroup analyses were conducted for patients who did and did not receive intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,520 elderly BAO patients were identified; 830 received EVT, and 1,690 received MM alone. After PSM, 1,115 patients and 715 patients remained in the MM and EVT groups, respectively. Compared to PSM controls, EVT was not significantly associated with different rates of home discharge (17.5% vs. 12.2%, OR 1.36 [95%CI 0.76-2.44], p=0.30) or in-hospital mortality (31.5% vs. 32.9%, OR 1.00 [95%CI 0.63-1.60], p=0.99), but it was significantly associated with higher rates of ICH (18.2% vs. 7.3%, OR 2.69 [95%CI 1.41- 5.15], p=0.003). Among patients who did not receive IVT, EVT was significantly associated with higher rates of home discharge (21.5% vs. 11.5%, OR 1.93 [95%CI 1.02-3.66], p=0.044), whereas EVT was not significantly associated with the same among those treated with IVT (5.6% vs. 15.0%, OR 0.28 [95%CI 0.05-1.46], p=0.13). Interaction analysis revealed that IVT was a negative modulator of EVT's positive association with home discharge (interaction p=0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVT was not significantly associated with more favorable hospitalization outcomes for elderly BAO stroke patients, and it was significantly associated with increased risk of ICH. EVT may be an effective treatment for patients who did not receive IVT.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>EVT = endovascular thrombectomy; BAO = basilar artery occlusion; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; MM = medical management; PSM = propensity score matching; IVT = intravenous thrombolysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular thrombectomy versus medical management for acute basilar artery occlusion stroke in the elderly.\",\"authors\":\"Huanwen Chen, Marco Colasurdo, Mihir Khunte, Ajay Malhotra, Dheeraj Gandhi\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for elderly basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke patients is unclear.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was an explorative retrospective analysis of the 2016-21 National Inpatient Sample in the United States. Elderly BAO stroke patients (80 years or older) with NIH stroke scale of at least 5 were included. Primary outcome was discharge to home. Secondary outcomes include in-hospital mortality and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Outcomes were compared between patients treated with EVT and those treated with medical management (MM) alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control for confounders. Subgroup analyses were conducted for patients who did and did not receive intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,520 elderly BAO patients were identified; 830 received EVT, and 1,690 received MM alone. After PSM, 1,115 patients and 715 patients remained in the MM and EVT groups, respectively. Compared to PSM controls, EVT was not significantly associated with different rates of home discharge (17.5% vs. 12.2%, OR 1.36 [95%CI 0.76-2.44], p=0.30) or in-hospital mortality (31.5% vs. 32.9%, OR 1.00 [95%CI 0.63-1.60], p=0.99), but it was significantly associated with higher rates of ICH (18.2% vs. 7.3%, OR 2.69 [95%CI 1.41- 5.15], p=0.003). Among patients who did not receive IVT, EVT was significantly associated with higher rates of home discharge (21.5% vs. 11.5%, OR 1.93 [95%CI 1.02-3.66], p=0.044), whereas EVT was not significantly associated with the same among those treated with IVT (5.6% vs. 15.0%, OR 0.28 [95%CI 0.05-1.46], p=0.13). Interaction analysis revealed that IVT was a negative modulator of EVT's positive association with home discharge (interaction p=0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVT was not significantly associated with more favorable hospitalization outcomes for elderly BAO stroke patients, and it was significantly associated with increased risk of ICH. EVT may be an effective treatment for patients who did not receive IVT.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>EVT = endovascular thrombectomy; BAO = basilar artery occlusion; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; MM = medical management; PSM = propensity score matching; IVT = intravenous thrombolysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:老年基底动脉闭塞(BAO)卒中患者血管内血栓切除术(EVT)的疗效和安全性尚不明确:这是一项对 2016-21 年美国全国住院患者样本的探索性回顾分析。纳入的老年 BAO 中风患者(80 岁或以上)的 NIH 中风评分至少为 5 分。主要结果是出院回家。次要结果包括院内死亡率和颅内出血(ICH)。对接受 EVT 治疗的患者和仅接受内科治疗 (MM) 的患者的结果进行了比较。为控制混杂因素,进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM)。对接受和未接受静脉溶栓(IVT)治疗的患者进行了亚组分析。结果:共发现 2,520 名老年 BAO 患者,其中 830 人接受了 EVT 治疗,1,690 人仅接受了 MM 治疗。PSM 后,MM 组和 EVT 组分别有 1115 名和 715 名患者。与 PSM 对照组相比,EVT 与出院回家率(17.5% vs. 12.2%,OR 1.36 [95%CI 0.76-2.44],p=0.30)或院内死亡率(31.5% vs. 32.9%,OR 1.00 [95%CI 0.63-1.60],p=0.99)无显著差异,但与较高的 ICH 发生率(18.2% vs. 7.3%,OR 2.69 [95%CI 1.41-5.15],p=0.003)显著相关。在未接受 IVT 的患者中,EVT 与较高的出院回家率显著相关(21.5% 对 11.5%,OR 1.93 [95%CI 1.02-3.66],P=0.044),而在接受 IVT 治疗的患者中,EVT 与较高的出院回家率无显著相关(5.6% 对 15.0%,OR 0.28 [95%CI 0.05-1.46],P=0.13)。交互分析显示,IVT是EVT与出院回家正相关性的负调节因子(交互作用P=0.031):EVT与老年BAO卒中患者更有利的住院预后无明显相关性,但与ICH风险增加有明显相关性。对于未接受 IVT 的患者,EVT 可能是一种有效的治疗方法:缩写:EVT = 血管内血栓切除术;BAO = 基底动脉闭塞;ICH = 颅内出血;MM = 医疗管理;PSM = 倾向评分匹配;IVT = 静脉溶栓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endovascular thrombectomy versus medical management for acute basilar artery occlusion stroke in the elderly.

Background and purpose: The efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for elderly basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke patients is unclear.

Materials and methods: This was an explorative retrospective analysis of the 2016-21 National Inpatient Sample in the United States. Elderly BAO stroke patients (80 years or older) with NIH stroke scale of at least 5 were included. Primary outcome was discharge to home. Secondary outcomes include in-hospital mortality and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Outcomes were compared between patients treated with EVT and those treated with medical management (MM) alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control for confounders. Subgroup analyses were conducted for patients who did and did not receive intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).

Results: 2,520 elderly BAO patients were identified; 830 received EVT, and 1,690 received MM alone. After PSM, 1,115 patients and 715 patients remained in the MM and EVT groups, respectively. Compared to PSM controls, EVT was not significantly associated with different rates of home discharge (17.5% vs. 12.2%, OR 1.36 [95%CI 0.76-2.44], p=0.30) or in-hospital mortality (31.5% vs. 32.9%, OR 1.00 [95%CI 0.63-1.60], p=0.99), but it was significantly associated with higher rates of ICH (18.2% vs. 7.3%, OR 2.69 [95%CI 1.41- 5.15], p=0.003). Among patients who did not receive IVT, EVT was significantly associated with higher rates of home discharge (21.5% vs. 11.5%, OR 1.93 [95%CI 1.02-3.66], p=0.044), whereas EVT was not significantly associated with the same among those treated with IVT (5.6% vs. 15.0%, OR 0.28 [95%CI 0.05-1.46], p=0.13). Interaction analysis revealed that IVT was a negative modulator of EVT's positive association with home discharge (interaction p=0.031).

Conclusions: EVT was not significantly associated with more favorable hospitalization outcomes for elderly BAO stroke patients, and it was significantly associated with increased risk of ICH. EVT may be an effective treatment for patients who did not receive IVT.

Abbreviations: EVT = endovascular thrombectomy; BAO = basilar artery occlusion; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; MM = medical management; PSM = propensity score matching; IVT = intravenous thrombolysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信